Is the AgriTech Market growing now?
In our AgriTech market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
SUMMARY
Yes, the AgriTech market is growing now, but commercial adoption is moving faster than venture funding.
The clearest growth is happening in technologies that save farmers money or labor quickly. Precision equipment, livestock systems, targeted automation and certain crop-input technologies are doing much better than broad “digital transformation” products.
Venture capital is not confirming a new boom. Upstream agrifoodtech funding recovered in 2025, but PitchBook's H1 2026 data show invested capital and deal count falling sharply again, with investors concentrating on fewer companies.
Headline funding totals can be misleading because a single large round now changes whole categories. ICEYE represented more than a quarter of one broad Q2 AgTech dataset, while Oishii accounted for more than 99% of controlled-environment agriculture funding in the same quarter.
Precision agriculture has moved beyond the early-adopter stage on larger farms. Auto-guidance, sensing, digital agronomy and connected machinery are already widely used, and farmers still say they plan to invest more even while equipment budgets stay tight.
AI is strongest when farmers barely need to think about the AI itself. Deere's See & Spray, equipment diagnostics, crop sensing and automated control have clear operating jobs and measurable economics; standalone agricultural chatbots have much less proof behind them.
Farm robotics is becoming commercially real, but only in narrow tasks. GUSS has logged hundreds of thousands of autonomous hours, while more ambitious platforms such as Monarch struggled badly, showing that specialized automation is scaling faster than general-purpose farm robots.
Livestock technology is one of the strongest niches because the payback is easy to understand. Virtual fencing and animal monitoring replace physical work that farmers already spend money and time on, which gives recurring software-and-hardware models a much cleaner sales story.
The weakest part of the market is still controlled-environment agriculture. The old vertical-farming boom has largely been dismantled through bankruptcies, shutdowns and acquisitions, and one premium strawberry company now explains almost all recent financing in the category.
The market is becoming much more selective. Farmers are still adopting technology, strategic buyers are still acquiring useful assets, and major equipment companies are leaning harder into precision systems, but capital now goes mainly to products that can prove a direct economic result.
This market map, featured in our AgriTech market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the AgriTech market
What actually counts as AgriTech here?
For this analysis, AgriTech means technology used directly to run farms and agricultural production: precision equipment, farm software, robotics, livestock systems, biological inputs, genetics, sensing and controlled-environment agriculture.
The boundary matters because “AgriTech” and “agrifoodtech” are often mixed together. AgFunder's broader agrifoodtech universe includes businesses such as food delivery, e-grocery and restaurant technology. Those companies can move the headline funding number without telling us much about what farmers are actually buying.
We therefore focus mainly on upstream and farm-facing technology. We still use broader datasets when they reveal an important capital trend, but we do not treat a large food-delivery round as evidence that agricultural technology is booming.
The same caution applies when comparing research providers. CropLife's AgTech dataset, for example, includes companies such as satellite operator ICEYE because agriculture is one of its markets. PitchBook uses a narrower classification. Neither approach is inherently wrong, but mixing the totals without checking what sits underneath them can produce a completely different answer.
Is AgriTech funding actually growing right now?
No, AgriTech venture funding is currently shrinking again, even though farm-facing investment recovered during 2025.
AgFunder found that upstream agrifoodtech startups raised about $9 billion in 2025, 7% more than the year before. That looked encouraging because total agrifoodtech funding was roughly flat at $16.2 billion and deal count fell 12%. Money was moving back toward technologies closer to farms and production.
The latest PitchBook data are weaker. Its full Q2 2026 AgTech report counted about $1 billion across 143 deals during the quarter, down from roughly $2 billion across 215 deals a year earlier. Across the first half of 2026, investment fell from about $3.7 billion to $2.4 billion while deal count dropped from 484 to 359.
That works out to a roughly 35% fall in invested capital and a 26% fall in deal count. Average capital per deal also slipped, from about $7.6 million to $6.7 million.
A broader CropLife/Cultivation Capital dataset tells a less bearish story, with roughly $2 billion invested across 158 companies during Q2 2026. But more than one-quarter of that money came from ICEYE, the Finnish radar-satellite company whose customers span several industries. Once we look underneath the totals, the disagreement makes sense.
| Dataset | Latest reading | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| AgFunder | Upstream funding reached about $9B in 2025, up 7% | Farm-facing capital recovered in 2025 |
| PitchBook | About $2.4B across 359 H1 2026 deals, down sharply year over year | The recovery has stalled |
| CropLife / Cultivation Capital | About $2B across 158 Q2 deals | Broader definitions make current funding look stronger |
| CropLife concentration | ICEYE alone represented more than 25% of Q2 dollars | A few very large rounds can distort the market |
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest AgriTech market report.
As this chart shows, and as featured in our AgriTech market deck, search interest in indoor farming has been growing steadily
Is AgriTech still in a funding crash?
The AgriTech funding crash has settled into a much lower and more selective market rather than continuing to collapse at its old speed.
The scale of the original correction was enormous. AgFunder recorded $51.7 billion of agrifoodtech venture funding at the 2021 peak. By 2023, the total had fallen to $15.6 billion, a decline of about 70% in two years. Funding then stayed around $16 billion in both 2024 and 2025.
CropLife sees a similar stabilization from another angle. Across the 14 quarters starting in early 2023, its broader AgTech dataset averaged roughly $1.5 billion and 182 deals per quarter. Quarterly totals still jump around, but the market has spent several years close to that lower range.
Funding behavior has changed too. Debt represented 18.2% of agrifoodtech financing in 2025, according to AgFunder, the highest proportion in a decade. Investors are also concentrating more money in companies that already have products, revenue or assets.
We would call the venture market normalized at a low level. That is a long way from another AgriTech boom, but it is also very different from the violent repricing that followed 2021.
Which parts of AgriTech are growing fastest now?
Precision agriculture, livestock technology and a few crop-input platforms are carrying most of AgriTech's current growth, while indoor farming and broad farm software remain much weaker.
Precision agriculture stands out in PitchBook's latest analysis. The category generated roughly one-third of Q2 AgTech venture value, and three of the ten largest rounds were precision-agriculture deals. Investors are concentrating on products that can reduce labor or inputs rather than tools that merely give farmers another dashboard.
Livestock technology has a similarly clear story. Halter alone raised $220 million at a $2 billion valuation, but its traction goes beyond fundraising: the company says more than 2,000 farmers and ranchers use its platform and one million solar-powered cattle collars have been sold.
Agricultural biologicals are attracting much less venture money than during their hype cycle, yet strategic buyers are still moving into the category. BASF recently completed its acquisition of biological crop-protection company AgBiTech, while Suterra acquired peptide-based crop-protection company Vestaron.
Controlled-environment agriculture gives us the opposite picture. CropLife counted about $153.3 million of Q2 financing in the category, but Oishii raised approximately $152.2 million of it. One strawberry company therefore represented more than 99% of the quarterly total.
| AgriTech area | What we see currently | Our read |
|---|---|---|
| Precision agriculture | Roughly one-third of PitchBook's Q2 AgTech VC value | Clear growth |
| Livestock technology | Halter raised $220M and reports 1M collars sold | One of the strongest niches |
| Agricultural biologicals | Lower VC activity but continuing strategic acquisitions | Growing through consolidation |
| Farm robotics | Real deployments but uneven startup outcomes | Growing selectively |
| Indoor farming | Q2 funding almost entirely explained by Oishii | Still fragile |
| Generic farm software | Much less capital than hardware-linked precision tech | Harder market |
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest AgriTech market report.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, illustrates yearly venture capital funding for AgriTech startups
Are farmers actually buying more precision agriculture technology?
Yes, farmers are still buying more precision agriculture technology today, especially when the product cuts input costs or labor quickly.
CNH recently surveyed 217 farmers and ranchers across the United States and Canada. The sample is relatively small and comes from an equipment manufacturer, so we would not use it alone. Still, the results are unusually current: 89% of respondents use auto-guidance, 71% say precision technology is important to their operation, and 54% plan to invest in additional precision technology within the next two years.
The reasons are even more useful than the adoption rate. Some 74% pointed to lower input costs, 70% to time or labor savings and 59% to higher yields. Cost was also the biggest barrier, mentioned by 56%, followed by uncertainty about ROI at 36%.
Longer-running independent data point in the same direction. USDA found auto-guidance being used by 52% of midsize U.S. crop farms and 70% of large-scale crop farms in 2023, compared with single-digit adoption rates in the early 2000s. Yield monitors, yield maps and soil maps were already used by 68% of large crop farms.
McKinsey's global farmer survey also found U.S. adoption reaching 61% for digital agronomy, 51% for precision-agriculture hardware and 38% for remote sensing. Large U.S. farms were 45% more likely than farms below 100 acres to adopt AgriTech.
Precision agriculture has crossed an important line. Among larger farms, we are increasingly looking at an upgrade market rather than an early-adopter market.
Is AI in agriculture actually useful today?
AI in agriculture is useful today when it controls a real farm task, and the strongest products hide the AI behind a measurable saving.
Deere's See & Spray is probably the cleanest example. Cameras and machine learning identify individual plants while the sprayer travels through a field, allowing herbicide to be applied selectively. Deere says the system covered more than five million acres in 2025 and reduced non-residual herbicide use by close to half on average, avoiding roughly 31 million gallons of herbicide mix.
That is a much stronger commercial proposition than selling farmers “AI insights.” The farmer can compare chemical spending before and after using the system.
CropX is pushing AI into another measurable job. Its recently launched CropX Vision product uses smartphone images to estimate water stress in vineyards. The company also added higher-resolution root-zone sensing and integrations for agricultural sustainability reporting. Again, the useful product sits around a specific decision: when to irrigate, what is happening below the soil, or how to document farm performance.
CNH is even using AI behind the farm rather than directly in the field. Its AI Tech Assistant for equipment dealers has already passed one million interactions and reached 30,000 active users, with CNH reporting adoption across 72% of its dealer network. Faster diagnosis and repair can be valuable to farmers without requiring them to interact with an AI product themselves.
For now, embedded AI looks much stronger than standalone agricultural chatbots. Machine vision, equipment diagnostics, crop sensing and automated control already have clear jobs. Farmer-facing generative AI still has much less public evidence of repeatable economic value.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, shows why Corteva is leading in AgriTech
Are farm robots finally working at scale?
Farm robots are working at meaningful commercial scale in a few jobs now, although broad farm automation remains far behind the industry's biggest promises.
GUSS shows what successful agricultural autonomy currently looks like. More than 250 of its autonomous sprayers have been deployed globally, covering about 2.6 million acres and logging more than 500,000 autonomous hours. One operator can supervise as many as eight machines remotely.
Those numbers are large enough to move GUSS beyond the demonstration stage. Deere first formed a joint venture with the company and later acquired it completely, giving the machines access to Deere's global dealer network.
The important detail is the task. Orchard spraying is repetitive, labor intensive and expensive. A supervised autonomous machine does not need to understand every possible farming situation; it needs to perform one job reliably for thousands of hours.
Other robotics companies have found the economics much harder. Monarch Tractor, which raised more than $200 million for its electric and autonomous tractor, ceased operations before its technology assets were acquired by Caterpillar. Bluewhite, another autonomous-farming company, was also acquired this year.
The pattern is pretty clear. Farm robotics works best when the machine attacks one expensive repetitive job and fits into an existing workflow. Building a general-purpose robotic replacement for farm labor remains much harder.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest AgriTech market report.
Why is livestock AgriTech growing faster than many other niches?
Livestock AgriTech is one of the clearest growth pockets now because virtual fencing and animal monitoring replace recurring physical work with something farmers can measure.
Halter gives us unusually concrete adoption evidence. The company raised $220 million at a $2 billion valuation in 2026 and says it now serves more than 2,000 farmers and ranchers across New Zealand, Australia and the United States. One million of its solar-powered collars have been sold.
Its U.S. customers have already created more than 60,000 miles of virtual fencing. Instead of installing and moving physical fences, ranchers can define boundaries through software and use collars with sound and vibration cues to manage cattle.
Halter is also expanding the system into animal health and pasture management. That makes the product more valuable once the hardware is already on the animal: the same collar that replaces fencing work can collect behavioral data and help manage grazing.
The economics are easy to understand compared with many farm-software products. Fencing costs money. Moving cattle takes time. Checking animals takes time. A system that reduces all three can justify a recurring technology bill.
Investors are responding to that clarity. Animal and aquaculture technology remains one of the stronger areas in PitchBook's current AgTech data, while several weaker categories continue to lose deal volume.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, illustrates yearly funding for AgriTech startups
Are agricultural biologicals still growing?
Agricultural biologicals are still attracting serious commercial interest, but the category is moving from startup proliferation toward consolidation.
The venture numbers these days are fairly modest. CropLife counted 19 Q2 deals across biologicals, pollination and novel crop inputs, worth about $57.7 million. That is tiny beside the money flowing into the biggest precision-agriculture or climate-related rounds.
Strategic activity tells a different story. BASF completed its acquisition of AgBiTech, a biological insect-control company whose products use naturally occurring viruses against caterpillar pests. AgBiTech already manufactures in the United States, Australia and Brazil, giving BASF a working product platform rather than an experimental research program.
Suterra's acquisition of Vestaron points in the same direction. Vestaron had raised roughly $285 million developing peptide-based insect-control products before being acquired. Large agricultural players increasingly seem willing to own differentiated biological technologies while venture investors become much less willing to fund every startup entering the category.
That is a tougher market for founders, but it can still be a growing product market. We expect fewer independent biological companies to survive while the stronger products move through established crop-protection distribution networks.
Is vertical farming still in trouble?
Yes, vertical farming is still in trouble today, and Oishii's large financing does very little to change the broader picture.
CropLife recorded approximately $153.3 million of controlled-environment agriculture funding in Q2 2026. Oishii's $152.2 million round represented more than 99% of that total. Without Oishii, the entire category raised barely $1 million in that dataset during the quarter.
The recent company history is even harder to ignore. Plenty entered Chapter 11 restructuring after raising close to $1 billion and previously reaching a valuation around $1.9 billion. Bowery Farming shut down after raising more than $700 million. Freight Farms also went through bankruptcy. AeroFarms, itself previously restructured, was acquired this year by a Palm Ventures affiliate. CropLife's latest exit data also show indoor-agriculture finance platform Contain being acquired.
Oishii may have found a better corner of the market by focusing on high-value strawberries rather than commodity leafy greens. A crop that sells at a premium gives indoor production far more room to absorb expensive buildings, energy, automation and labor.
For now, the broader vertical-farming thesis has failed to show that the economics work across enough crops and enough facilities. Controlled-environment agriculture will probably survive, but the version investors funded during the previous boom has already been largely dismantled.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest AgriTech market report.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, compares the main business model options for precision agriculture platforms
Are strategic buyers still acquiring AgriTech startups?
Yes, strategic buyers are still acquiring AgriTech startups, and M&A is currently a much more credible exit route than the public markets.
CropLife counted 15 AgTech exits during Q2 2026 and 25 during the first half of the year. Every Q2 exit was an acquisition. There were no IPOs in that dataset.
The buyer list is quite revealing. Caterpillar acquired Monarch Tractor's technology assets. URUS Group bought livestock-management software company AgriWebb. Munters acquired poultry and livestock monitoring company OPTIfarm. Suterra bought Vestaron. AeroFarms also changed hands.
Deere's acquisition of Sentera shows what a healthier strategic transaction looks like. Sentera makes drone-based agricultural imaging and field-scouting technology that can feed weed maps and spraying prescriptions into Deere's Operations Center. The product fits directly into Deere's existing precision-agriculture stack.
CropX has taken a similar approach from the software side. Its acquisition of Acclym, formerly Agritask, was CropX's seventh strategic acquisition and brought enterprise customers including AB InBev, Nestlé, General Mills and McCain.
Some of today's M&A clearly involves distressed assets, so acquisition counts alone should not be read as proof of a booming market. What stands out is the kind of technology buyers keep taking: sensing, crop protection, autonomy, livestock management and farm data that can be plugged into a larger platform.
Can farmers actually afford more AgriTech right now?
Farmers can still pay for AgriTech today, but tighter farm finances are forcing technology vendors to prove the payback much faster.
USDA currently forecasts U.S. net farm income at about $153.4 billion for 2026, down 2.6% after inflation. That level remains above the twenty-year average, so American farming as a whole is hardly in crisis.
Liquidity looks less comfortable. USDA expects farm working capital to fall 9.2%, while sector debt rises 5.2% to roughly $624.7 billion. The debt-to-asset ratio is also expected to worsen slightly.
Farmers are already behaving accordingly. AGCO said in its latest quarterly results that replacement-parts demand remained stable as farmers prioritized maintaining existing equipment fleets. The company described farmers as increasingly cautious in several regions and kept production aligned closely with retail demand.
That changes what sells. A farmer may keep an existing tractor for another season while upgrading guidance, spraying, planting or sensing technology attached to it. Retrofit businesses can even benefit from that behavior.
These days, AgriTech vendors have a much easier conversation when they can say “this saves $20 per acre” or “this removes several hours of labor” than when they promise a long-term digital transformation.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, shows revenue breakdown by customer segment in the AgriTech market
What do Deere, AGCO and CNH say about AgriTech demand today?
Deere, AGCO and CNH are seeing weak farm-equipment demand alongside stronger precision-tech adoption, one of the clearest signs that AgriTech is growing inside a difficult machinery cycle.
Deere's latest results make the contrast unusually visible. Production and Precision Agriculture sales fell about 6% year over year, and the company still expects the U.S. and Canadian large-agriculture equipment market to decline 15% to 20% for the full year.
Technology adoption is moving the other way. Deere says current orders suggest factory adoption of See & Spray will nearly double, with the system included on roughly one-third of North American sprayers on order. More than 40% of its model-year 2027 North American planters include newer technologies such as ExactRate, ExactShot or FurrowVision.
The digital side is growing too. Deere now reports more than 520 million engaged acres and nearly 1.2 million connected machines in its Operations Center, with more than 190 million acres classified as highly engaged. Highly engaged acreage is growing at a double-digit rate.
AGCO's latest quarter was also mixed. Group sales were $2.6 billion, down 1% year over year and 3.7% excluding currency effects. North American sales rose almost 20%, while Latin America fell 25%. Management continues to describe near-term market conditions as difficult, yet its PTx precision-agriculture business remains a central growth bet. AGCO has built PTx into roughly a $900 million platform and is targeting $2 billion of precision-agriculture revenue by 2029.
CNH is making a similar bet. Its long-term plan calls for Precision Tech sales to nearly double as a share of agricultural revenue by 2030, while the company continues to factory-fit more precision systems across its equipment lines.
| Company | What is happening to the equipment cycle | What is happening in AgriTech |
|---|---|---|
| Deere | Large-ag market still down sharply; Production & Precision Agriculture sales down about 6% | See & Spray factory adoption expected to nearly double; digital acreage still growing |
| AGCO | Q2 group sales down 1%; several regions remain weak | PTx is a ~$900M platform targeting $2B by 2029 |
| CNH | Farmers remain cautious on large equipment spending | Precision Tech is expected to nearly double its share of agriculture sales by 2030 |
Is AgriTech growing outside North America too?
AgriTech is growing outside North America too, although current European funding looks much stronger in dollars than it does in the number of companies getting financed.
Tech.eu's latest H1 2026 dataset counted €327 million invested across 34 European AgriTech rounds. Funding jumped almost 160% compared with the same period in 2025, while the number of rounds actually fell 5.6%.
The ten largest rounds represented 76.7% of all European capital. Tropic raised €91 million, Innovafeed about €51 million and satellite-imagery company ConstellR €37 million. A handful of companies therefore explain most of the apparent acceleration.
This concentration is appearing in several regions. AgFunder previously found developing-market agrifoodtech investment rising 63% in 2024 even as the global market declined, while deal count in those countries fell. Upstream investment in developing markets rose about 22% to $1.2 billion.
The regional opportunity also depends heavily on the structure of farming. Huge North American row-crop farms can justify expensive autonomous and precision machinery. Brazil is a major market for biological crop protection. Livestock technology has scaled first in places such as New Zealand and Australia. European AgriTech currently has strong activity in genetics, biological systems, sensing and climate technology.
There is no single global AgriTech cycle. The common thread is that capital and adoption are moving toward technologies with a clear local economic reason to exist.
This chart, featured in our AgriTech market deck, shows how smart irrigation system technology has evolved over time
Is the AgriTech market growing now?
Yes, the AgriTech market is growing now, but commercial adoption is moving faster than venture funding.
The strongest part of the case comes from what farms are actually using. Precision agriculture has become mainstream on larger farms, farmers still plan to buy more of it, connected agricultural acreage keeps increasing, livestock technology has produced companies with real international scale, and certain autonomous machines have already accumulated millions of commercial acres.
Capital markets give us a more cautious answer. AgriTech venture investment is currently down year over year, deal counts are falling and investors are concentrating money in fewer companies. As seen above, even apparently strong categories can depend heavily on one giant round. The 2021 funding environment has not returned.
The weak farm-equipment cycle actually makes the adoption data more convincing. Farmers are being careful with large purchases, farm liquidity is tightening and major equipment manufacturers are still dealing with soft demand. Yet precision-tech attachment rates, connected acreage and investment plans continue to move higher.
There are also clear losers. Vertical farming remains damaged. Generic farm software faces a difficult sales environment. Several robotics companies have failed or been acquired after raising large amounts of capital. Biologicals are consolidating. AgriTech today rewards technologies that can show a direct economic result much more aggressively than it did a few years ago.
We would therefore call the claim mostly true. The AgriTech market is growing, especially in precision agriculture, livestock technology, biological crop protection and narrowly defined automation. What is shrinking is the willingness to finance every company that calls itself AgriTech.
That distinction is probably the best way to understand the market these days: farmers are using more technology, while investors are demanding much stronger proof before paying for it.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest AgriTech market report.
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis tests whether the AgriTech market is growing now by separating farm-level commercial adoption from capital-market momentum. We focus on technology used directly in agricultural production, including precision equipment, farm software, robotics, livestock systems, biological inputs, genetics, sensing and controlled-environment agriculture.
We kept AgriTech separate from the broader agrifoodtech market wherever possible. AgFunder's wider universe can include food delivery, e-grocery and restaurant technology, while other providers use narrower farm-facing definitions. Broader datasets are used when they reveal an important capital trend, but downstream food-tech funding is not treated as proof that farm technology itself is growing.
Funding was assessed using both direction and concentration. We compared the 2025 recovery in upstream agrifoodtech investment with H1 and Q2 2026 AgTech data, then looked beneath category totals when one financing round represented an unusually large share of the market. This is why companies such as ICEYE and Oishii are discussed separately rather than allowed to define an entire quarter.
Commercial growth was assessed using farmer adoption, installed systems, acres covered, connected machines, equipment attachment rates, repeat operating activity and direct economic outcomes. Evidence from CNH farmer surveys, USDA adoption data, McKinsey's farmer research, Deere's See & Spray deployments, GUSS autonomous-sprayer hours and Halter's customer and collar counts carried more weight than demonstrations or broad claims about future potential.
We also used farm economics and major equipment-company results to test whether adoption is holding up in a difficult spending environment. USDA farm-income, working-capital and debt data were considered alongside Deere, AGCO and CNH results so that rising technology adoption was not confused with a strong overall machinery cycle.
M&A was treated as a separate indicator rather than automatic proof of growth. Acquisitions by Deere, Caterpillar, BASF, Suterra, URUS Group, Munters and others can show strategic demand for useful technology, but some transactions involve distressed assets. The type of technology being acquired therefore matters more than the raw acquisition count.
The final assessment is based on the combined direction, freshness and strength of the evidence across funding, adoption, deployment, strategic activity and farm economics. Recent 2025 and 2026 evidence was prioritized, and commercial scale, repeat use and measurable savings were given more weight than projections or isolated headline rounds.
Key sources used for this analysis include: AgFunder on 2025 agrifoodtech funding and upstream investment, CropLife / Cultivation Capital on Q2 2026 AgTech investment and exits, CNH's 2026 Farmer Pulse survey, USDA ERS on precision-agriculture adoption, McKinsey's global farmer technology-adoption survey, John Deere on See & Spray deployment, John Deere on current See & Spray capabilities, CropX on CropX Vision, CropX's 2026 product updates, Halter on its Series E, customer base and collar deployments, John Deere / GUSS on autonomous-sprayer deployment and the acquisition, BASF on the AgBiTech acquisition, Suterra on the Vestaron acquisition, USDA ERS on the 2026 farm-income outlook, USDA ERS on farm liquidity and debt, AGCO's Q2 2026 results, CNH's strategic plan for Precision Tech, CNH's technology strategy across AI, autonomy, robotics and automation, and John Deere's Q3 2026 earnings materials.
In our AgriTech market deck, we identify pain points entrepreneurs should prioritize
