What are the most valued startups in the circular economy?
Download our beautiful pitch about the circular economy

In our circular economy deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The circular economy combines resale marketplaces, recycling infrastructure, sustainable materials, waste-management technology and business models designed to keep products and resources in use for longer.
This ranking tracks the most valuable circular economy startups using reported valuations, public market capitalizations, acquisition prices and carefully constructed estimates.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, market movements, acquisitions and other valuation signals.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the circular economy.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable circular economy startup | Vinted, $9.1B |
| Second most valuable circular economy startup | Redwood Materials, $6.0B–$6.5B |
| Median circular economy startup valuation | Approximately $178M |
| Share of circular economy valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 64% |
| Top circular economy startup valuation vs. median | Approximately 51 times |
| Median circular economy valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 2.5 times |
| Circular economy startups valued at $1B+ | 16 |

This market map, featured in our circular economy deck, highlights top companies and startups in the circular economy
Top startups in the circular economy ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the circular economy based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the circular economy.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinted | Peer-to-peer fashion resale marketplace | $9.1B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $564M | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Redwood Materials | Battery recycling and energy storage | $6.0B–$6.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $3.8B | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Back Market | Refurbished electronics marketplace | $5.3B–$5.9B | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1.0B | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Indigo Ag | Agricultural sustainability technology platform | $3.2B–$3.8B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $1.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | GOAT | Sneaker and apparel resale marketplace | $3.0B–$3.8B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $493M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | StockX | Authenticated collectibles resale marketplace | $2.2B–$2.6B | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Implied | $495M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | PureCycle Technologies | Recycles polypropylene resin | $1.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $770M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | The RealReal | Luxury goods consignment marketplace | $1.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $588M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Spiber | Fermentation-derived sustainable protein fibers | $1.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $490M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | Depop | Social fashion resale marketplace | $1.2B | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $100M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Poshmark | Social fashion resale marketplace | $1.2B | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $480M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | OfferUp | Local secondhand goods marketplace | $900M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $380M | Partial Confidence |
| 13 | Divert | Food-waste recovery and renewable energy | $1.0B–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $204M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | AMP Robotics | AI recycling automation robots | $800M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $350M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Vestiaire Collective | Authenticated luxury resale marketplace | $900M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $667M | Full Confidence |
| 16 | Cirba Solutions | Battery recycling processor | $800M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $300M | Partial Confidence |
| 17 | thredUP | Managed online thrift marketplace | $840M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $470M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Mura Technology | Hydrothermal plastic recycling | $650M–$950M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $106M | Partial Confidence |
| 19 | Plastic Energy | Converts plastic waste feedstock | $500M–$900M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $168M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Syre | Textile-to-textile polyester recycling | $600M–$800M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Full Confidence |
| 21 | TerraCycle | Hard-to-recycle waste programs | $500M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $25M | Low Confidence |
| 22 | RWDC Industries | Biodegradable PHA plastics | $350M–$600M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $263M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Samsara Eco | Enzymatic plastic recycling | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $106M | Full Confidence |
| 24 | Loam Bio | Microbial soil carbon technology | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $110M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | Varaha | Develops agricultural carbon-removal projects | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Ghost | Surplus inventory B2B marketplace | $300M–$450M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $88M | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | Nth Cycle | Modular metal recovery technology | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $130M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | Ecovative | Mycelium materials and packaging | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $169M | Partial Confidence |
| 29 | Lohum | Battery recycling materials India | $290M–$350M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $220M | Partial Confidence |
| 30 | Attero | E-waste and battery recycling | $300M–$330M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Observed | $150M | Partial Confidence |
| 31 | Greyparrot | AI waste analytics platform | $250M–$380M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $27M | Strong Confidence |
| 32 | MycoWorks | Premium mycelium-based leather materials | $220M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $225M | Partial Confidence |
| 33 | Archive | Branded resale operating software | $200M–$330M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $54M | Full Confidence |
| 34 | Trove | Enterprise branded resale platform | $180M–$280M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $150M | Partial Confidence |
| 35 | Reju | Industrial textile polyester regeneration | $150M–$300M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 36 | Circ | Textile-to-textile recycling | $180M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $63M | Full Confidence |
| 37 | Rebag | Luxury handbag resale platform | $180M–$260M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $101M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Regrow Ag | Agricultural sustainability measurement software | $180M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $58M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | traceless | Agricultural-waste compostable biomaterials | $160M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Partial Confidence |
| 40 | Raylo | Device subscription platform | $195M–$210M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 41 | Infinited Fiber Company | Regenerated textile fibers | $140M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $91M | Strong Confidence |
| 42 | Natural Fiber Welding | Plastic-free plant-based materials | $140M–$240M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $225M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | Novoloop | Plastic upcycling materials | $140M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $62M | Strong Confidence |
| 44 | TIPA | Compostable flexible packaging | $120M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $130M | Strong Confidence |
| 45 | Agreena | Regenerative farming carbon platform | $140M–$190M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $77M | Strong Confidence |
| 46 | Klim | Regenerative agriculture transition platform | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | Worn Again Technologies | Textile polymer recycling | $110M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $48M | Full Confidence |
| 48 | Modern Meadow | Biofabricated materials and coatings | $110M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $184M | Strong Confidence |
| 49 | Lactips | Water-soluble natural polymer materials | $105M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | Notpla | Seaweed packaging alternatives | $100M–$170M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $47M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | PulPac | Dry-molded fiber packaging technology | $100M–$170M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $38M | Partial Confidence |
| 52 | Glacier | AI-powered recycling robots | $90M–$135M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Full Confidence |
| 53 | Rent the Runway | Designer fashion rental platform | $111M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $714M | Partial Confidence |
| 54 | Optoro | Retail returns optimization software | $80M–$140M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $213M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Carbios | Enzymatic plastic recycling | $100M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $323M | Strong Confidence |
| 56 | Shellworks | Compostable plant-based packaging materials | $75M–$125M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $22M | Strong Confidence |
| 57 | Xampla | Plant-protein plastic replacement materials | $70M–$115M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $32M | Full Confidence |
| 58 | Cruz Foam | Compostable protective foam packaging | $75M–$105M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 59 | Ambercycle | Regenerated polyester material | $65M–$105M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $27M | Partial Confidence |
| 60 | Winnow | AI-powered food-waste management | $70M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $35M | Partial Confidence |
| 61 | Agilyx | Advanced plastic recycling | $77M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $120M | Partial Confidence |
| 62 | Ascend Elements | Battery recycling materials | $30M–$120M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 63 | Rheaply | Enterprise asset reuse software | $55M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $34M | Partial Confidence |
| 64 | Treet | Branded resale platform software | $50M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $19M | Partial Confidence |
| 65 | Faume | Branded fashion resale infrastructure | $50M–$80M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $19M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Evrnu | Regenerated textile fibers | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $29M | Strong Confidence |
| 67 | Recycleye | AI robotic waste sorting | $40M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $23M | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | Soil Capital | Regenerative agriculture carbon certificates | $45M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $22M | Partial Confidence |
| 69 | LanzaTech | Carbon recycling fermentation | $49M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $469M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | Li-Cycle | Lithium battery recycling network | $40M–$45M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $1.1B | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Sulapac | Bio-based plastic alternatives | $30M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $24M | Partial Confidence |
| 72 | Reflaunt | Enterprise fashion resale technology | $30M–$55M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 73 | Genecis | Waste-to-bioplastics platform | $30M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 74 | Loop Industries | Depolymerizes PET waste | $38M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $52M | Partial Confidence |
| 75 | Kelpi | Seaweed-based packaging barrier coatings | $28M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | Modern Synthesis | Microbial textile biomaterials | $28M–$45M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Strong Confidence |
| 77 | Recurate | Branded resale marketplace software | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $18M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | Sway | Seaweed-based flexible packaging | $20M–$35M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 79 | Circular Systems | Waste-derived textile fiber technologies | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $16M | Partial Confidence |
| 80 | Loliware | Seaweed-based alternatives to plastics | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $15M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | VitroLabs | Cell-cultivated leather technology | $10M–$25M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $54M | Partial Confidence |
| 82 | Everledger | Blockchain product provenance platform | $0M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $30M | Partial Confidence |
| 83 | Full Cycle Bioplastics | Organic-waste bioplastics | $0M–$2M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 84 | Rubicon | Waste management software platform | $0M–$1M | Partial Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $600M | Strong Confidence |
| 85 | Bolt Threads | Biomaterials for personal-care products | $0M–$1M | Partial Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $471M | Strong Confidence |
| 86 | Nori | Soil carbon-removal marketplace | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Strong Confidence |

This chart, featured in our circular economy deck, compares the 2026 size of the circular economy with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the circular economy
Insights
- The circular economy startup landscape is highly concentrated. The ten largest companies represent roughly $35.3B in midpoint value, equal to about 64% of the valuation tracked across the full ranking.
- Recommerce remains the circular economy's largest value-creation engine. Vinted, Back Market, GOAT, StockX, Depop and Poshmark collectively account for more than $22B in current or estimated valuation.
- Vinted is the clearest capital-efficiency outlier among the market leaders. Its $9.1B valuation is approximately 16 times the company's $564M funding base.
- Depop also produced a strong resale outcome. The company's $1.2B acquisition value was about 12 times cumulative funding, compared with roughly 2.5 times for Poshmark.
- Battery recycling shows how capital intensity can limit investor returns. Redwood Materials and Li-Cycle raised approximately $4.9B combined, but their current combined value is only around 1.3 times that amount.
- Li-Cycle provides the sharpest downside example in the ranking. Its midpoint transaction value of roughly $43M represents less than 4% of the company's reported $1.1B funding base.
- AI recycling technology appears much more capital efficient. Greyparrot and Glacier have a combined midpoint valuation of approximately $428M from only $55M in cumulative funding.
- Greyparrot's estimated valuation is nearly 12 times its funding, which suggests that asset-light waste analytics can create value faster than capital-intensive recycling plants.
- Syre has reached an estimated midpoint valuation of $700M from $100M in funding. This indicates that textile recycling platforms can attract strong valuation multiples before reaching full industrial scale.
- Public markets are applying stricter standards to circular economy companies. Carbios, LanzaTech and Agilyx are each valued below cumulative funding, despite operating in strategically important recycling segments.
- Early-stage packaging companies Notpla, Shellworks and Xampla have a combined midpoint value of approximately $328M from about $101M in funding, producing a blended ratio above three times.
- The gap between the largest circular economy startups and the typical company is substantial. Vinted's valuation is approximately 51 times the dataset's median valuation of about $178M.

This chart, featured in our circular economy deck, shows why Back Market is winning in the circular economy
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the circular economy based on their current valuation.
Estimating circular economy startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company, business model and stage of development.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a circular economy company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a circular economy startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, transaction volume or customer traction, combined with valuation multiples from comparable companies in the same circular economy segment.
The circular economy includes very different business models. Resale marketplaces, recycling plants, sustainable material companies, waste-management platforms and regenerative agriculture businesses do not receive the same valuation multiples.
For this reason, we select comparable companies from the closest possible business category instead of applying one valuation model to the entire circular economy.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, commercial partnerships, production capacity or product traction.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the circular economy.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our circular economy deck, shows annual funding in circular economy startups
Related blog posts
- The most recent developments reported in the circular economy
- The most recent funding news in the circular economy
- The most recent developments in the circular economy
- How funding activity has changed in the circular economy
- What are the latest fundraising trends in the circular economy?
- What is the real size of the circular economy?
- A complete list of business models in the circular economy
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.