What are the most valued startups in the wearable technology market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the wearable technology market

In our wearable technology market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The wearable technology market includes smart rings, health sensors, medical wearables, augmented-reality glasses, connected audio devices and performance-tracking products.
Oura and WHOOP lead the ranking by a wide margin, while a growing group of wearable health and spatial-computing companies has reached valuations above $1 billion.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, public-market movements, acquisitions and changes in estimated startup valuations.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the wearable technology market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable wearable technology startup | Oura, $11.0B |
| Second most valuable wearable startup | WHOOP, $10.1B |
| Median wearable technology valuation | Approximately $80M |
| Wearable market valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 82% |
| Top wearable startup valuation vs. median | Approximately 138 times |
| Median wearable valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 3.1 times |
| Wearable startups valued at $1B+ | 11 based on valuation midpoints |

This market map, featured in our wearable technology market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the wearable technology market
Top startups in the wearable technology market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the wearable technology market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the wearable technology market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oura | Smart health rings | $11.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.3B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | WHOOP | Performance health wearable | $10.1B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $979M | Partial Confidence |
| 3 | Wispr AI | Voice-first AI dictation software | $1.8B–$2.0B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $82M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Magic Leap | Enterprise AR headsets | $1.5B–$2.0B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3.5B | Partial Confidence |
| 5 | boAt | Audio and wearables | $1.3B–$1.5B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $171M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | RayNeo | AI AR smart glasses | $1.0B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $143M | Low Confidence |
| 7 | BrainCo | Non-invasive brain-computer interface devices | $1.3B–$1.5B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $292M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | XPANCEO | AI smart contact lenses | $1.2B–$1.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $290M | Full Confidence |
| 9 | Nothing | Consumer tech devices | $1.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $450M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | XREAL | Consumer AR glasses | $1.0B–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $433M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | VITURE | Consumer XR glasses | $750M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $222M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Rokid | AR smart glasses | $800M–$1.1B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $270M | Low Confidence |
| 13 | Biolinq | Metabolic biosensor platform | $700M–$1.1B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $273M | Strong Confidence |
| 14 | Mojo Vision | Micro-LED display platform | $550M–$950M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $341M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Willow | Wearable breast pumps | $550M–$850M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $228M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | VitalConnect | Wearable biosensor monitoring | $400M–$600M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $308M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | Cala Health | Wearable tremor therapy | $350M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $300M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Ultrahuman | Smart rings and biomarkers | $320M–$600M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $103M | Partial Confidence |
| 19 | Biobeat | Cuffless blood-pressure monitoring patches | $330M–$480M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $51M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | Hilo | Cuffless blood pressure monitoring | $280M–$525M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Full Confidence |
| 21 | DigiLens | AR waveguide display technology | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $147M | Strong Confidence |
| 22 | INMO | Consumer AI augmented-reality glasses | $260M–$300M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $94M | Partial Confidence |
| 23 | Epicore Biosystems | Sweat-sensing health monitoring wearables | $210M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Swave Photonics | Holographic AR display chips | $180M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $53M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | IXI | Autofocusing adaptive prescription glasses | $180M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $41M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Neurable | Brain-sensing technology for everyday devices | $190M–$290M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $56M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Temple | Cerebral blood-flow monitoring wearable | $190M | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $54M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Empatica | Medical-grade health wearables | $140M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Xplora | Kids smartwatches and subscriptions | $183M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 30 | OrCam | Assistive vision wearables | $100M–$250M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $86M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Orpyx | Diabetic foot monitoring insoles | $130M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Sandbar | AI note-taking smart ring | $120M–$190M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $36M | Full Confidence |
| 33 | Avegant | Light engines for AR glasses | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $82M | Partial Confidence |
| 34 | Luna Ring / Noise | Smart rings and consumer wearables | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Sky Labs | Medical blood-pressure smart rings | $140M–$155M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $45M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Pimax | High-end VR headsets | $90M–$175M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $79M | Partial Confidence |
| 37 | Lumus | Reflective waveguides for AR glasses | $100M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $57M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Playermaker | Soccer performance tracking sensors | $100M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $50M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | Varjo | Enterprise VR/XR headsets | $90M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $139M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | USound | MEMS speakers for hearables | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $84M | Strong Confidence |
| 41 | Dispelix | AR waveguide displays | $70M–$150M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $61M | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | NextSense | EEG sleep-tracking wireless earbuds | $85M–$135M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | Tilt Five | Tabletop augmented-reality gaming system | $80M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $21M | Full Confidence |
| 44 | Sightful | Spatial workspace software for AR | $75M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $61M | Strong Confidence |
| 45 | Cardiosense | AI cardiac monitoring wearable platform | $70M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $15M | Strong Confidence |
| 46 | Bragi | Hearable operating systems and software | $70M–$120M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $22M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | Cellid | AR waveguides and spatial recognition | $70M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | RingConn | Subscription-free health smart rings | $65M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 49 | hearX | Digital hearing aids and diagnostics | $60M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $13M | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | Mobvoi | AI smartwatches and voice technology | $78M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $284M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | DPVR | VR headset manufacturer | $50M–$100M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $47M | Low Confidence |
| 52 | Mira | Lightweight AR headsets | $50M–$100M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $17M | Partial Confidence |
| 53 | PlayerData | Team sports performance trackers | $55M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Bellabeat | Women-focused wellness wearables | $55M–$90M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $19M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Flow Neuroscience | Depression brain-stimulation treatment headset | $50M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 56 | Ozlo | Sleep-focused wireless earbuds | $55M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $22M | Full Confidence |
| 57 | Shot Scope | Golf GPS and shot tracking | $50M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $21M | Partial Confidence |
| 58 | MAD Gaze | Consumer augmented-reality smart glasses | $45M–$80M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $32M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | AngelSense | Special-needs GPS safety trackers | $35M–$70M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 60 | myFirst | Connected devices designed for children | $40M–$60M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Full Confidence |
| 61 | Shadow Creator | Mixed-reality headsets and glasses | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $38M | Low Confidence |
| 62 | Carv | Digital ski-coaching wearable | $35M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $11M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | TickTalk Tech | Kids GPS communication watches | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 64 | Embr Labs | Thermal comfort wrist wearables | $35M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $11M | Partial Confidence |
| 65 | Solos | AI smart glasses | $25M–$60M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 66 | Gabit | Integrated health and smart rings | $30M–$50M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $13M | Strong Confidence |
| 67 | NeoSensory | Haptic hearing and tinnitus wearables | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $16M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | InteraXon | Muse EEG meditation headbands | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $26M | Partial Confidence |
| 69 | Timekettle | Real-time translation earbuds | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | Strive | Muscle performance monitoring garments | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $9M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Pison | Wrist-based neural gesture sensing | $25M–$43M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Partial Confidence |
| 72 | Brilliant Labs | Open-source AI smart glasses | $20M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 73 | ThirdEye | Enterprise AR glasses and software | $20M–$45M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 74 | Nix Biosensors | Sweat-based hydration monitoring patches | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 75 | Quell | Resistance-based fitness gaming wearable | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Full Confidence |
| 76 | .lumen | Navigation glasses for blind users | $23M–$38M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 77 | Spire Health | Remote respiratory patient monitoring | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $48M | Partial Confidence |
| 78 | Movano Health | Women-focused medical smart ring | $29M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $77M | Partial Confidence |
| 79 | Hexoskin | Biometric smart clothing and analytics | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 80 | MyKronoz / BOW | Hybrid smartwatches and connected devices | $18M–$35M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $34M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | CardiacSense | Wrist-based cardiac vital monitoring | $18M–$25M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $15M | Low Confidence |
| 82 | Circular | Health-monitoring smart rings | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 83 | Sensoria | Sensor-enabled garments and socks | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 84 | Stryd | Running power meter footpod | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $300K | Partial Confidence |
| 85 | NeuroSky | Consumer EEG sensor modules | $12M–$22M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $18M | Partial Confidence |
| 86 | Danu Sports | Movement-analysis sensor socks | $12M–$22M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 87 | Clim8 | Intelligent temperature-regulating clothing | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 88 | Emteq Labs | Facial-sensing eyewear analytics | $8M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $3M | Low Confidence |
| 89 | NeoSapien | AI-native wearable memory assistant | $8M–$14M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 90 | Halo Neuroscience | Athletic neurostimulation headset | $5M–$15M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 91 | Soundbrenner | Wearable metronomes for musicians | $6M–$11M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 92 | OMI | Open-source AI memory wearable | $6M–$11M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 93 | Lucyd | Smart eyewear brand | $7M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $8M | Strong Confidence |
| 94 | Sonic Lamb | Haptic immersive headphones | $4M–$7M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 95 | RunScribe | Running gait analysis sensors | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 96 | NURVV | Biomechanical running-sensor insoles | $0M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 97 | Lynx | Mixed reality headsets | $0M–$2M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 98 | deWiz | Golf swing analysis wearable | $0M–$2M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $9M | Strong Confidence |
| 99 | Cosmo Connected | Connected mobility safety equipment | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 100 | LAFORGE Optical | Prescription augmented-reality smart glasses | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |

This chart, included in our wearable technology market deck, compares the 2026 size of the wearable technology market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the wearable technology market
Insights
- Oura and WHOOP account for almost two-thirds of the top 10 wearable technology valuation, showing that scaled health platforms command a much larger premium than most device manufacturers.
- The top 10 wearable startups represent approximately 82% of the dataset’s combined midpoint valuation, which makes the wearable technology market highly concentrated despite its wide range of products.
- Oura’s $11.0B valuation is approximately 138 times the dataset’s median valuation, highlighting the large commercial gap between category leaders and the typical wearable technology company.
- BrainCo, XPANCEO and Neurable reach approximately $3.0B in combined midpoint valuation after raising about $638M, showing that technically complex neurotechnology and smart-lens platforms can still use capital efficiently.
- Neurable, Temple, Sandbar and Sky Labs have raised approximately $191M in total, yet the four specialized wearable companies carry about $733M in combined midpoint valuation.
- Smart rings appear at both ends of the wearable technology market. Oura leads at $11.0B, while focused companies such as Sandbar and Sky Labs support valuations near $150M.
- XREAL raised $433M to reach a midpoint valuation near $1.1B, while boAt raised $171M and reached approximately $1.4B, suggesting materially stronger capital efficiency for boAt.
- Lucyd, Mobvoi and Movano Health show how public-market pricing can compress wearable technology valuations below cumulative capital raised, even after substantial product development and investor backing.

This chart, included in our wearable technology market deck, shows why Whoop is leading in wearable technology
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the wearable technology market based on their current valuation.
Estimating wearable technology startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed wearable companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a wearable technology company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a wearable company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a wearable technology startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, unit sales, subscriptions or customer traction, combined with valuation multiples from comparable wearable technology companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, regulatory progress, product adoption or commercial partnerships.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because wearable technology valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the wearable technology market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, included in our wearable technology market deck, illustrates yearly funding for wearable technology startups
Related blog posts
- The latest news in the wearable technology market
- The most recent funding news in wearable technology
- The most recent developments in wearable technology
- The evolution of funding activity in wearable technology
- The main fundraising trends in wearable technology
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.