What are the most valued startups in the AI governance market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the AI governance market

In our AI governance market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The AI governance market is expanding around evaluation, observability, security, compliance and tools that help enterprises control increasingly complex AI systems.
This ranking tracks the most valuable AI governance startups using announced valuations, acquisition prices, fundraising signals and carefully constructed estimates.
We update this list every month so the ranking reflects new funding rounds, acquisitions and other valuation signals as they become available.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the AI governance market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable AI governance startup | Arize AI, $915M |
| Second most valuable AI governance startup | Braintrust, $800M |
| Median AI governance startup valuation | About $25M |
| Share of AI governance valuation captured by top 10 | About 56% |
| Top AI governance valuation vs. median | About 37x |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | About 4.5x |
| AI governance startups valued at $1B+ | 0 |

This market map, featured in our AI governance market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the AI governance market
Top startups in the AI governance market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the AI governance market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more details about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the AI governance market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arize AI | AI evaluation and observability | $915M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $131M | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Braintrust | AI evaluation and observability platform | $800M | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $124.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Protect AI | Secures AI models and supply chains | $635M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $108.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Patronus AI | AI evaluation and agent simulation | $430M–$460M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $70.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | HiddenLayer | Protects enterprise AI models and agents | $380M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $186M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Robust Intelligence | AI model security and red-teaming | $325M–$375M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $44M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | Galileo | Enterprise AI evaluation platform | $250M–$450M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $68M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Fiddler | AI observability, safety and governance | $220M–$300M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Advai | AI testing and assurance | $180M–$330M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $31M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | Lakera | Runtime security for generative AI | $202M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Mindgard | Automated AI red teaming protection | $150M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | Cranium | Enterprise AI security governance platform | $135M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $72M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | Lasso Security | Secures enterprise AI models agents | $150M–$200M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$45M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | JetStream Security | Enterprise AI governance control plane | $140M–$200M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Prompt Security | Runtime protection for generative AI | $160M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $23M | Strong Confidence |
| 16 | Arthur | AI monitoring evaluation and security | $140M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $64M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | CalypsoAI | Enterprise AI inference security | $145M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $43.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 18 | Credo AI | Enterprise AI governance and compliance | $125M–$165M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $41.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 19 | Dynamo AI | Enterprise AI risk and compliance | $100M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $23.9M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | Virtue AI | AI security and runtime protection | $100M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | Harmonic Security | Prevents sensitive data leakage to AI | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $26M | Strong Confidence |
| 22 | Vijil | Builds secure and reliable AI agents | $85M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $23M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | LatticeFlow | Evidence-based AI governance | $65M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $26.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Kolena | AI model testing platform | $60M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $21M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | Singulr AI | Enterprise AI governance and security | $50M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $10M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Openlayer | AI testing governance and observability | $55M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $19.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Portal26 | Enterprise GenAI governance and security | $55M–$65M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | DeepKeep | AI-native security across AI lifecycle | $45M–$80M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Modulos | Automated enterprise AI compliance governance | $50M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $17.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 30 | 2021.AI | Enterprise AI governance platform | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12.6M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Seldon | Enterprise AI deployment and monitoring | $45M–$75M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 32 | HoneyHive | AI agent evaluation and observability | $40M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7.4M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | ModelOp | Enterprise AI lifecycle governance platform | $40M–$60M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $16.7M | Strong Confidence |
| 34 | WhyLabs | AI monitoring and observability | $40M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Aporia | AI observability and guardrails | $45M–$55M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Holistic AI | Enterprise AI governance and assurance | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 37 | Distributional / Talaria Scientific | AI testing now scientific software | $30M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Mind Foundry | Responsible enterprise AI solutions | $30M–$50M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $19M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | TrojAI | AI application security and testing | $40M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $12.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | Armilla AI | AI assurance and warranties | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6.7M | Strong Confidence |
| 41 | Guardrails AI | Open-source AI reliability guardrails | $30M–$45M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 42 | ValidMind | Enterprise AI governance for finance | $30M–$45M | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $8.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Mona | Production AI performance monitoring | $25M–$40M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | ~$9M | Partial Confidence |
| 44 | Trustible | Enterprise AI governance software | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6.4M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 45 | Enkrypt AI | AI security testing and compliance | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $2.35M | Strong Confidence |
| 46 | Themis AI | Quantifies AI model uncertainty | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2.8M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | AIShield | AI model and GenAI security | $20M–$35M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 48 | Invariant Labs | Security guardrails for agentic AI | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 49 | Lumenova AI | Enterprise AI risk and governance | $18M–$32M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 50 | QuantPi | AI risk management platform | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | BreezeML | Enterprise AI testing and governance | $18M–$30M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 52 | Hamming | Voice-agent testing and monitoring | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $4.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 53 | Enzai | Enterprise AI governance and enablement | $18M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Citrusx | AI validation explainability and monitoring | $18M–$27M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Giskard | AI testing and red teaming | $15M–$28M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$5M incl. grants | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | Scorecard | Testing and evaluation for agents | $15M–$25M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3.75M | Strong Confidence |
| 57 | Athina AI | Collaborative AI evaluation platform | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $3.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 58 | FairNow | Automated enterprise AI governance | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $4.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Preamble | Generative AI security controls | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 60 | Calvin Risk | Quantitative AI risk management platform | $16M–$24M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 61 | Leap Labs | AI interpretability for scientific discovery | $12M–$22M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 62 | Prodago | Data and AI governance workflows | $12M–$22M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 63 | Datatron | MLOps and model governance | $12M–$22M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$12M | Partial Confidence |
| 64 | Deepchecks | AI testing and evaluation | $10M–$20M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 65 | Guardrail Technologies | Enterprise AI security and compliance | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Deeploy | Runtime AI governance platform | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$3M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | Vera | Generative AI safety guardrails | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | CertifAI | Independent AI testing and certification | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 69 | SuperAlign | Enterprise AI security infrastructure | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 70 | Konfer | Continuous AI agent governance assurance | $10M–$18M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Validaitor | AI assurance and compliance platform | $8M–$16M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 72 | Fairly AI / Asenion | AI governance risk compliance platform | $9M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 73 | AutoAlign | Generative-AI security and governance | $7M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $35K disclosed grant | Partial Confidence |
| 74 | Censius | AI model observability platform | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 reported | Low Confidence |
| 75 | Confident AI | LLM evaluation and observability platform | $9M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | trail | Automated enterprise AI governance compliance | $9M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$1.7M | Partial Confidence |
| 77 | Saidot | Knowledge-graph based AI governance | $8M–$13M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1.8M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | KomplyAI | AI governance risk compliance platform | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 79 | NannyML | Machine-learning performance monitoring | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 80 | Code4Thought | AI assurance and governance | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 81 | Tibo | Prevents corporate data leakage to AI | $4M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 82 | Atla AI | AI agent evaluation and reliability | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M | Strong Confidence |
| 83 | Numalis | Certifies AI robustness and compliance | $7M–$12M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $6.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 84 | Mithril Security | Privacy-preserving secure AI infrastructure | $5M–$15M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $1.7M | Strong Confidence |
| 85 | Adversa AI | AI agent runtime security | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$0.2M disclosed | Partial Confidence |
| 86 | Asher Informatics | Healthcare AI governance platform | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 87 | Zetane | Enterprise AI document intelligence | $5M–$9M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 88 | Halluminate | Training environments for computer agents | $5M–$9M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $0.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 89 | Zuverise (Zupervise) | AI risk transparency and observability | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 90 | Fairo | Responsible AI governance software | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | No material equity funding disclosed | Low Confidence |
| 91 | Etiq AI | AI testing fairness and debugging | $4M–$7M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$2M | Partial Confidence |
| 92 | SigmaRed | Regulated-enterprise AI governance | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 93 | Daios | User-sovereign AI alignment research | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed grant funding | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Aligned AI | AI alignment and safety systems | $3M–$5M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $1.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 95 | CertKOR AI | AI ethics auditing and controls | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 96 | Trubrics | Product analytics for AI agents | $2M–$3M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 97 | Seclea | Responsible AI governance platform | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$0.3M | Partial Confidence |
| 98 | equalityAI | Healthcare AI bias governance | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1.25M | Strong Confidence |
| 99 | Trst.ai | AI trust platform now inactive | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, compares the 2026 size of the AI governance market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the AI governance market
Insights
- The AI governance market is highly concentrated. The top 10 companies represent about 56% of the combined valuation in this dataset, even though the ranking includes almost 100 startups.
- Acquisitions are a major source of value creation in AI governance. Arize AI, Protect AI, Lakera, Prompt Security, CalypsoAI and TrojAI represent roughly $2.1 billion of transaction value combined.
- AI security businesses have produced some of the strongest capital efficiency in the market. Lakera reached a $202 million acquisition value after raising $30 million, while Prompt Security reached $160 million after raising $23 million.
- Robust Intelligence also stands out. Its estimated $350 million acquisition value is close to eight times the company's $44 million in cumulative funding.
- Patronus AI has a midpoint valuation near $445 million after raising $70.5 million. That represents roughly 6.3 times cumulative funding and shows the premium attached to specialized AI evaluation infrastructure.
- The AI governance market has a steep valuation curve. Arize AI is valued at roughly 37 times the market median, while no company in the dataset has yet crossed the $1 billion valuation threshold.
- Established governance platforms are clustered much lower than the category leaders. Modulos, ModelOp, Openlayer and Portal26 sit around the $50 million to $65 million level despite meaningful product maturity and cumulative funding.
- Open-source infrastructure can still support strong valuation multiples. Guardrails AI's estimated $30 million to $45 million valuation equals roughly four to six times its $7.5 million of funding.

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, looks at Credo's strategy in AI governance
A few words about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the AI governance market based on their current valuation.
Estimating AI governance startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and available information varies widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When an AI governance company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If an AI governance startup was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, customer traction or enterprise adoption, combined with valuation multiples from comparable AI governance companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, product traction or adoption of an AI evaluation, security or compliance platform.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by acquisition prices, strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because AI governance valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the AI governance market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, shows annual funding in AI governance startups
Related blog posts
- Is the AI Governance Market growing now?
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.