What are the most valued startups in the AI governance market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the AI governance market

In our AI governance market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The AI governance market brings together startups that help organizations evaluate, monitor, secure, and control artificial intelligence systems.
This ranking compares 99 AI governance startups using their latest reported acquisition prices, funding-round valuations, and carefully constructed valuation estimates.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, acquisitions, operating data, and changes in market conditions.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the AI governance market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable AI governance startup | Braintrust, $800M |
| Second most valuable AI governance startup | Protect AI, $700M |
| Median AI governance startup valuation | Approximately $24M |
| Share of AI governance valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 54.5% |
| Top AI governance valuation vs. median | Approximately 33.3 times |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 5.0 times |
| AI governance startups valued at $1B+ | 0 |

This market map, featured in our AI governance market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the AI governance market
Top startups in the AI governance market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the AI governance market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the AI governance market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braintrust | AI observability and evaluations | $800M | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $121M | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Protect AI | Secures AI applications and models | $700M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $109M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Arize AI | AI observability and evaluation | $350M–$500M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $131M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Patronus AI | Tests and evaluates AI agents | $330M–$500M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $70M | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | Robust Intelligence | Tests and secures AI models | $400M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $44M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Galileo | GenAI evaluation and observability | $280M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $68M | Full Confidence |
| 7 | Lakera | Protects generative AI applications | $280M–$320M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $30M | Full Confidence |
| 8 | CalypsoAI | Enterprise generative AI security guardrails | $180M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $41M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Prompt Security | Secures enterprise generative AI usage | $180M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $23M | Full Confidence |
| 10 | Arthur | AI monitoring and governance platform | $140M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $60M | Full Confidence |
| 11 | JetStream Security | Enterprise AI governance security | $160M–$190M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Full Confidence |
| 12 | Fiddler | AI observability and governance platform | $120M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | HiddenLayer | Detects attacks against AI models | $110M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $56M | Full Confidence |
| 14 | Credo AI | Responsible AI governance platform | $110M–$150M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $41M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Virtue AI | AI safety and security | $110M–$145M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | Mind Foundry | High-stakes AI decision systems | $100M–$150M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $44M | Partial Confidence |
| 17 | Distributional | AI testing and evaluation | $95M–$145M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Full Confidence |
| 18 | Lasso Security | Secures LLMs and AI agents | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Full Confidence |
| 19 | Vijil | Builds trust infrastructure for agents | $95M–$135M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $23M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Harmonic Security | Prevents sensitive AI data leakage | $85M–$125M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $24M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | Dynamo AI | Enterprise AI compliance platform | $75M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $19M | Full Confidence |
| 22 | Kolena | AI model testing platform | $75M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $21M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | ModelOp | Enterprise AI governance software | $70M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Cranium | Manages enterprise AI security risks | $60M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $32M | Partial Confidence |
| 25 | LatticeFlow | Trustworthy AI testing platform | $60M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Full Confidence |
| 26 | Modulos | AI compliance automation platform | $55M–$85M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $11M | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | Openlayer | AI testing and governance platform | $50M–$75M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $19M | Full Confidence |
| 28 | Portal26 | Manages enterprise generative AI adoption | $50M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Full Confidence |
| 29 | Singulr AI | Enterprise AI governance platform | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Full Confidence |
| 30 | Seldon | Enterprise ML deployment governance | $40M–$70M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | DeepKeep | Protects models and AI applications | $40M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Mindgard | Automates AI security red teaming | $40M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Full Confidence |
| 33 | Aporia | AI observability and guardrails | $40M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $30M | Full Confidence |
| 34 | ValidMind | Financial AI risk management | $40M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 35 | Monitaur | Regulated model governance platform | $30M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $13M | Full Confidence |
| 36 | Holistic AI | Enterprise AI governance platform | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 37 | Invariant Labs | Secures autonomous AI agent systems | $25M–$55M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 38 | AIShield | Protects models against adversarial attacks | $25M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 39 | TrojAI | Secures and tests AI applications | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 40 | Trustible | Enterprise AI governance management platform | $25M–$40M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Strong Confidence |
| 41 | Guardrails AI | LLM guardrails and assurance | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $8M | Full Confidence |
| 42 | Armilla AI | AI assurance and insurance | $24M–$38M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | HoneyHive | AI agent observability platform | $25M–$38M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Strong Confidence |
| 44 | WhyLabs | AI monitoring and model security | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $14M | Full Confidence |
| 45 | Deeploy | AI governance and MLOps platform | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | CitrusX | AI validation and explainability | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Full Confidence |
| 47 | Hamming | Voice agent testing platform | $20M–$32M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | Scorecard | AI agent evaluation platform | $20M–$30M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Full Confidence |
| 49 | Calvin Risk | Quantitative AI risk management | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 50 | 2021.AI | Enterprise responsible AI governance platform | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $4M | Low Confidence |
| 51 | Athina AI | LLM evaluation and monitoring | $18M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 52 | FairNow | Automates AI governance and compliance | $15M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 53 | Censius | AI monitoring and explainability | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 54 | Enzai | Automated AI governance platform | $16M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | BreezeML | Embeds governance into ML workflows | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 56 | Atla AI | AI agent evaluation engine | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | Konfer | Agentic compliance platform | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 58 | Preamble | Configurable AI safety controls | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 59 | SuperAlign | Enterprise AI security platform | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 60 | Mona | AI monitoring and observability | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Low Confidence |
| 61 | Confident AI | LLM evaluation platform | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 62 | Numalis | Validates safety-critical AI systems | $13M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | Deepchecks | AI testing and evaluation platform | $10M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | Saidot | EU AI governance SaaS | $10M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 65 | Vera | Enforces enterprise generative AI policies | $10M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | QuantPi | AI risk management platform | $10M–$17M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 67 | Enkrypt AI | Provides guardrails and AI red-teaming | $9M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 68 | Datatron | MLOps and AI governance | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 69 | NannyML | ML monitoring and drift detection | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 70 | Giskard | AI model security testing | $8M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | trail | AI governance GRC platform | $8M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 72 | Lumenova AI | Integrated AI governance platform | $8M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 73 | Prodago | Data and AI governance | $6M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 74 | Fairo | Responsible AI governance tooling | $6M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 75 | Fairly AI | AI risk compliance platform | $7M–$13M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 76 | Themis AI | AI uncertainty and debiasing | $7M–$13M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 77 | Mithril Security | Protects private AI data processing | $7M–$12M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | Zetane | Complex document AI platform | $7M–$12M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 79 | Advai | AI assurance and stress-testing | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 80 | AutoAlign | Industrial AI assistant platform | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 81 | Validaitor | AI governance and compliance suite | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 82 | Guardrail Technologies | AI security governance software | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 83 | KomplyAI | AI governance risk and compliance | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 84 | Code4Thought | Audits AI and software systems | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 85 | Trst.ai | AI trust and governance | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 86 | Aligned AI | Develops human-aligned AI systems | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 87 | Etiq AI | ML testing and debugging copilot | $5M–$7M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 88 | equalityAI | Healthcare AI compliance platform | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 89 | Leap Labs | AI interpretability research tools | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 90 | Trubrics | Tracks feedback for AI products | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 91 | Halluminate | Trains financial-services AI agents | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 92 | Daios | AI governance software | $2M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 93 | Adversa AI | Tests AI systems against attacks | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Certifai | Tests and certifies AI systems | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 95 | CertKOR AI | Audits personal data used by AI | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 96 | SigmaRed | AI governance consulting and compliance | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 97 | Zuverise | AI governance, unverified | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 98 | Seclea | Responsible AI lifecycle governance | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 99 | Asher Informatics | Clinical AI governance platform | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 100 | Tibo | Prevents workplace AI data leaks | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, compares the 2026 size of the AI governance market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the AI governance market
Insights
- The top 10 AI governance startups represent approximately $3.9B in midpoint value, or about 54.5% of the combined valuation across the entire ranking.
- Braintrust and Protect AI alone account for $1.5B in value, which is greater than the combined midpoint valuation of Arize AI, Patronus AI, and Galileo.
- AI security companies Protect AI, Robust Intelligence, Lakera, CalypsoAI, Prompt Security, and JetStream Security represent about $1.9B in combined value from only $281M in disclosed funding.
- Acquisitions have become an important source of liquidity in AI governance, with several of the highest-ranked companies reaching clearer and often richer outcomes through strategic buyers.
- Evaluation and observability companies Braintrust, Arize AI, Patronus AI, Galileo, Fiddler, HoneyHive, and Scorecard collectively represent approximately $2.2B in value.
- The median AI governance startup is valued at about $24M, while Braintrust is valued at roughly 33 times that amount, showing how concentrated the market remains.
- Robust Intelligence reached an observed acquisition value equal to approximately 9.1 times its disclosed funding, demonstrating the strategic value of securing and testing AI models.
- Prompt Security reached a $180M acquisition value after raising $23M, producing a value-to-funding multiple of approximately 7.8 times.
- Early-stage AI agent infrastructure can remain capital efficient. Portal26, Trustible, HoneyHive, Scorecard, and Zetane represent about $148M in combined midpoint value from only $34M in funding.

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, looks at Credo's strategy in AI governance
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the AI governance market based on their current valuation.
Estimating AI governance startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When an AI governance company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If an AI governance startup was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, enterprise customer traction, or product adoption, combined with valuation multiples from comparable AI governance companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, product traction, regulatory relevance, or acquisition interest.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by acquisition values, strong operating metrics, and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each AI governance startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency, and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the AI governance market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our AI governance market deck, shows annual funding in AI governance startups
Related blog posts
- The latest news in AI governance
- The latest funding news in AI governance
- The latest update in AI governance
- The evolution of funding activity in AI governance
- The main fundraising trends in AI governance
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.