What are the most valued startups in the counter-UAS market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the counter-UAS market

In our counter-UAS market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The counter-UAS market includes radar developers, electronic warfare specialists, interceptor manufacturers, directed-energy companies and airspace security platforms.
This ranking compares 99 counter-UAS startups and defense technology companies using their latest reported or estimated valuations.
We update this list every month as new funding rounds, acquisitions, listings and market data become available.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the counter-UAS market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable counter-UAS startup | CHAOS Industries, $4.5B |
| Second most valuable counter-UAS startup | Allen Control Systems, $2.2B |
| Median counter-UAS company valuation | Approximately $30M |
| Share of counter-UAS valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 74% |
| Top counter-UAS valuation vs. median | Approximately 150 times |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 4 times, among funded companies |
| Counter-UAS startups valued at $1B+ | 10 |

This market map, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the counter-UAS market
Top startups in the counter-UAS market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the counter-UAS market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the counter-UAS market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHAOS Industries | Advanced radar and sensing systems | $4.5B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.0B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Allen Control Systems | Autonomous counter-drone weapon stations | $2.2B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $242M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Epirus | High-power microwave defense | $1.8B–$2.4B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $537M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Zen Technologies | Defence training and counter-drone systems | $1.8B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $119M | Partial Confidence |
| 5 | D-Fend Solutions | RF cyber drone takeover | $1.5B | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $59M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | XTEND | Tactical autonomous battlefield robots | $1.5B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Observed | $90M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | DroneShield | AI counter-drone systems | $1.4B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $160M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | Cambridge Aerospace | Low-cost air-defense interceptors | $1.0B–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $136M | Partial Confidence |
| 9 | Kela Technologies | Military technology integration platform | $1.0B–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $100M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | MyDefence | RF drone detection and jamming | $800M–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 11 | Aurora Flight Sciences | Autonomous advanced aircraft systems | $400M–$700M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Dedrone | Smart airspace security | $503M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $130M | Partial Confidence |
| 13 | Hidden Level | Passive RF drone detection | $400M–$600M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $118M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | Zone 5 Technologies | Mass-produced missiles and interceptors | $350M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 15 | AP Systems | Integrated counter-drone radar systems | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 16 | SmartShooter | AI weapon fire-control systems | $395M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $85M | Partial Confidence |
| 17 | Solar Defence and Aerospace | Missiles, munitions and defence systems | $220M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 18 | DefSecIntel | Autonomous border surveillance systems | $220M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 19 | Fortem Technologies | Radar counter-UAS systems | $170M–$310M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $94M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | TYTAN Technologies | AI air-defense interceptor systems | $190M–$260M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $54M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | SIGN4L | Electronic warfare and counter-UAS systems | $150M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 22 | Sentrycs | Cyber-over-RF counter-UAS | $225M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 23 | Omnisys | Battlefield resource orchestration software | $200M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 24 | MatrixSpace | AI radar drone detection | $130M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $40M | Partial Confidence |
| 25 | SkySafe | Drone detection and forensics platform | $80M–$150M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $49M | Partial Confidence |
| 26 | Big Bang Boom Solutions | Indian counter-drone weapon systems | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $35M | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | WhiteFox Defense Technologies | Drone detection and mitigation | $60M–$120M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $32M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Liteye Systems | Integrated counter-drone defense systems | $65M–$105M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Easy Aerial | Autonomous tethered drone platforms | $60M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $11M | Strong Confidence |
| 30 | MC2 Technologies | Microwave jamming and drone neutralization | $55M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $60M | Partial Confidence |
| 31 | Optimized Electrotech | AI electro-optical surveillance systems | $55M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $17M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | CerbAir | RF anti-drone systems | $40M–$90M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $8M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | Convexum | Cyber-based counter-drone mitigation | $60M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 34 | Alpine Eagle | Air-to-air counter-drone defense | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $11M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Aurelius Systems | Autonomous anti-drone laser systems | $40M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Full Confidence |
| 36 | OpenWorks Engineering | Kinetic drone capture systems | $40M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 37 | Black Sage Technologies | Multi-mission counter-UAS platforms | $30M–$80M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 38 | Citadel Defense | Automated radio-frequency drone mitigation | $35M–$65M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $14M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | AIM Defence | Laser counter-drone weapon systems | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 40 | Blighter Surveillance Systems | Electronic-scanning counter-UAS radar | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 41 | Verus Technology Group | Passive RF drone detection | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 42 | Allen Vanguard | Electronic countermeasure protection systems | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | SteelRock Technologies | Portable radio-frequency drone jammers | $30M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 44 | MARSS | Counter-drone command-and-control software | $36M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 45 | Robotican | Autonomous interception drones and robots | $32M–$38M | Strong Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $9M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Indrajaal | Autonomous wide-area drone defense | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | Perseus Defense | Low-cost guided drone interceptors | $24M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | Walaris | AI sensor-fusion defense software | $24M–$38M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Strong Confidence |
| 49 | Skylock | Multi-layer drone detection and mitigation | $20M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 50 | Origin Robotics | Autonomous drone interception systems | $22M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | Throttle Aerospace Systems | Military and commercial drone systems | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 52 | AirRobot | Military reconnaissance drone systems | $18M–$35M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 53 | Microflown AVISA | Acoustic battlefield threat localization | $18M–$32M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Nordic Air Defence | Low-cost kinetic drone interceptors | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | AirSight | Real-time drone detection platform | $15M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | CPM Elettronica | Radio-frequency jamming counter-drone systems | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 57 | DSE Technologies | Drone detection and RF neutralization | $15M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 58 | Grene Robotics | Autonomous drone-security command platform | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 59 | COPTRZ | Commercial drone services and training | $14M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 60 | DefSecIntel Solutions | Integrated counter-UAS surveillance systems | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 61 | Drone Defence | Counter-drone detection and mitigation | $10M–$22M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 62 | ApolloShield Anti-Drone Systems | Detects and blocks unauthorized drones | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | Airobotics | Autonomous drone-in-box platforms | $15M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $101M | Partial Confidence |
| 64 | Defendec | Remote perimeter surveillance sensors | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 65 | Drone Major Group | Drone procurement and advisory platform | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Marduk Technologies | Optical drone detection systems | $8M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 67 | GINA Software | Crisis mapping and response software | $11M–$15M | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | Airspace Systems | Autonomous rogue-drone interception | $8M–$16M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $25M | Strong Confidence |
| 69 | SkeyDrone | Drone airspace situational awareness | $8M–$16M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 70 | Shoghi Communications | Electronic warfare and surveillance systems | $8M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Drone XTR | French anti-drone protection systems | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 72 | IIO Technologies | Counter-drone and electronic warfare systems | $7M–$13M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 73 | Thermopylae Aerospace | Low-cost interceptor drones | $7M–$11M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 74 | Armory | Indigenous AI counter-drone systems | $7M–$11M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 75 | AerialX | Kinetic counter-drone interception systems | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 76 | Sentradel | Autonomous kinetic counter-drone defense | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 77 | Vyomastra | Full-stack drone and anti-drone platforms | $6M–$10M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 78 | FIONSYSTEMS | AI radar counter-drone systems | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 79 | Prime Anti-Drone | Kinetic anti-drone ammunition systems | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 80 | AirShare | Missile-based drone interception systems | $5M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | Dabin Systems | RF-based counter-drone detection | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 82 | Senhive | Networked passive drone detection | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 83 | ParaZero Technologies | Drone safety and counter-UAS systems | $6M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $22M | Partial Confidence |
| 84 | Asteria Aerospace | Defence and industrial drone systems | $6M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0M | Strong Confidence |
| 85 | Sharang Shakti | Airspace surveillance defence robotics | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 86 | Edgeforce | Indigenous military deep-tech systems | $5M–$7M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 87 | Dronehub | Autonomous drone-in-box systems | $4M–$8M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 88 | Fly4Future | Autonomous drone and robotics systems | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 89 | Zebu | Autonomous counter-drone swarm systems | $4M–$7M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 90 | Swiss Aerobotics | Net-based drone interception systems | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 91 | Nimo Drone Security | Sensor-based perimeter drone security | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 92 | Unnayan Tech | Handheld hard-kill counter-drone systems | $3M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 93 | NQDefense | Integrated anti-drone security systems | $2M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Shotling | Kinetic anti-FPV shotgun systems | $3M–$5M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 95 | BizGarden | Drone-industry advisory and project services | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 96 | DefSpace | Defence and aerospace marketplace | $2M–$4M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $0M | Partial Confidence |
| 97 | Cervi Robotics | Autonomous drone infrastructure development | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 98 | Hawking Defence Services | Anti-drone and autonomous aircraft systems | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 99 | Probotek | AI drone operations platform | $1M–$2M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 100 | Bluvec | Portable RF drone detection | $0M–$1M | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, compares the 2026 size of the counter-UAS market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the counter-UAS market
Insights
- The ten largest counter-UAS companies represent approximately 74% of the combined valuation in this ranking, showing how strongly market value is concentrated around scaled defense platforms.
- CHAOS Industries and Allen Control Systems are worth a combined $6.7B, which highlights the premium investors place on advanced radar architectures and autonomous hard-kill counter-drone systems.
- Allen Control Systems has raised about one quarter as much capital as CHAOS Industries, but its valuation is nearly half as large, indicating substantially higher valuation per dollar of disclosed funding.
- D-Fend Solutions reached a $1.5B acquisition value after raising $59M. This represents more than 25 times its funding base and shows the strategic scarcity of cyber-based drone mitigation technology.
- XTEND reached a $1.5B listing valuation on approximately $90M of funding, suggesting that autonomous battlefield robotics can generate significant value without the capital requirements of large aerospace programs.
- Convexum produced a $60M acquisition exit after raising only $2M. The 30 times valuation-to-funding ratio shows that specialized counter-UAS cyber capabilities can attract buyers before large-scale venture funding.
- The largest company is worth around 150 times the median company in the ranking, illustrating the sharp divide between scaled counter-UAS platforms and early-stage specialist developers.
- Counter-UAS valuations span from below $1M to $4.5B, but only ten companies reach the $1B threshold. Most of the market remains composed of small radar, interceptor, jamming and software specialists.

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, shows why DroneShield is winning in counter-UAS
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the counter-UAS market based on their current valuation.
Estimating counter-UAS startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many private defense companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, financial performance or contract details.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed defense companies, official acquisition prices and verified fundraising documents.
When a counter-UAS company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a counter-UAS startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, recurring software revenue, defense contracts, order backlogs or deployed systems. We combine these metrics with valuation multiples from comparable defense technology companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals. These signals can include hiring growth, investor quality, government contracts, military testing, product deployments and commercial traction.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by public market data, official acquisition values, operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older funding rounds, contracts and market estimates are treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because counter-UAS valuation data is not always fully public, each company in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This reflects the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the counter-UAS market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, shows annual funding in counter-UAS startups
Related blog posts
- The most recent news in the counter-UAS market
- The most recent funding news in the counter-UAS market
- The latest update in the counter-UAS market
- The evolution of funding activity in the counter-UAS market
- The main fundraising trends in the counter-UAS market
- How big is the counter-UAS market today?
- A complete list of business models in the counter-UAS market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.