What are the most valued startups in the counter-UAS market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the counter-UAS market

In our counter-UAS market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The counter-UAS market is becoming one of the most strategic categories in defense technology, as drones are now cheap, scalable and hard to ignore.
This list ranks counter-UAS startups by valuation, using the latest reported or estimated data available in our dataset.
We update this list every month, so the ranking can keep reflecting new funding rounds, acquisitions, public market moves and valuation changes.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the counter-UAS market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable counter-UAS startup | CHAOS Industries, $4.5B |
| Second most valuable counter-UAS startup | Epirus, $1.4B–$4.5B |
| Median counter-UAS startup valuation | $32.5M |
| Share of counter-UAS valuation captured by the top 10 | About 74% |
| Top counter-UAS startup valuation vs. median | About 138x |
| Median counter-UAS valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | About 5.3x |
| Counter-UAS startups valued at $1B+ | 5 startups |

This market map, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the counter-UAS market
Top startups in the counter-UAS market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the counter-UAS market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the counter-UAS market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHAOS Industries | Distributed defense sensing radar | $4.5B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.0B | Full Confidence |
| 2 | Epirus | High-power microwave defense systems | $1.4B–$4.5B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $595M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Allen Control Systems | Autonomous counter-drone weapon stations | $2.2B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $242M | Full Confidence |
| 4 | DroneShield | AI drone detection and defeat | $1.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $207M | Partial Confidence |
| 5 | Zen Technologies | Counter-drone and defense simulators | $1.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $132M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | XTEND | Tactical autonomous battlefield robots | $470M–$875M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $90M | Partial Confidence |
| 7 | Hidden Level | Passive RF drone sensing | $500M–$700M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $121M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Solar Defence and Aerospace | Defence UAVs and robotics | $450M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 9 | Aurora Flight Sciences | Autonomous aircraft systems | $400M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $15M | Low Confidence |
| 10 | Dedrone | Airspace security and drone detection | $500M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Implied | $130M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Cambridge Aerospace | Low-cost air-defense interceptors | $390M–$430M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $136M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Zone 5 Technologies | Affordable anti-drone missiles | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 13 | SmartShooter | Anti-drone fire-control sights | $335M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $65M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | D-Fend Solutions | RF cyber drone takeover | $210M–$390M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $67M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Big Bang Boom Solutions | Indian anti-drone systems | $220M–$330M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $35M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | Fortem Technologies | Radar and drone interception | $170M–$310M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $94M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | Kela Technologies | Defense integration software platform | $180M–$280M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 18 | Sentrycs | Cyber-over-RF drone mitigation | $225M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 19 | TYTAN Technologies | AI air-defense interceptors | $160M–$270M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $53M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Omnisys | C-UAS mission planning software | $200M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 21 | MatrixSpace | Portable AI counter-drone radar | $135M–$250M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $40M | Partial Confidence |
| 22 | SkySafe | Drone detection and mitigation | $120M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $45M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Liteye Systems | Integrated counter-UAS systems | $80M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 24 | MARSS | Counter-drone C2 platform | $36M–$199M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 25 | AP Systems | Modular anti-drone protection systems | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 26 | Allen Vanguard | Counter-UAS electronic protection | $70M–$140M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 27 | MC2 Technologies | Anti-drone microwave systems | $80M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $59M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | DefSecIntel | Autonomous surveillance systems | $75M–$125M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 29 | AIM Defence | Laser counter-drone systems | $60M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 30 | MyDefence | Wearable RF counter-drone systems | $60M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 31 | Drone Defence | Drone detection and mitigation | $55M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Verus Technology Group | RF counter-UAS tracking systems | $50M–$90M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 33 | Blighter Surveillance Systems | Ground radar drone detection | $50M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 34 | WhiteFox Defense Technologies | Drone detection and mitigation systems | $40M–$90M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $32M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Airspace Systems | Autonomous drone interception systems | $45M–$75M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $25M | Full Confidence |
| 36 | Asteria Aerospace | Defence and industrial drones | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $813K | Strong Confidence |
| 37 | Citadel Defense | AI counter-drone defense | $40M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | Alpine Eagle | Air-to-air counter-drone software | $45M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $11M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | SIGN4L | Electronic warfare C-UAS systems | $40M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 40 | SteelRock Technologies | Portable RF drone jammers | $35M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 41 | Aurelius Systems | Autonomous anti-drone lasers | $40M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Full Confidence |
| 42 | Cervi Robotics | Robotics and UAV prototyping | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 43 | Drone XTR | French drone site protection | $30M–$55M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 44 | Optimized Electrotech | AI surveillance imaging systems | $30M–$50M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 45 | Robotican | Tactical air-ground robotics | $32M–$42M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 46 | Easy Aerial | Tethered drone-in-a-box systems | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $11M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | DefSpace | Defence-space marketplace/platform | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $478K | Partial Confidence |
| 48 | Indrajaal | Wide-area autonomous drone defense | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 49 | Walaris | AI airspace sensing software | $25M–$39M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 50 | Perseus Defense | Low-cost micro-missile interceptors | $24M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | Shoghi Communications | Defence electronics surveillance | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 52 | AirRobot | Tactical reconnaissance drones | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 53 | Convexum | Counter-drone takeover technology | $25M–$32M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Origin Robotics | Autonomous drone interceptor systems | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Marduk Technologies | Electro-optical drone targeting | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | CerbAir | RF anti-drone site protection | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | Throttle Aerospace Systems | Drone hardware and software manufacturer | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 58 | Grene Robotics | Autonomous counter-drone AI platform | $18M–$32M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 59 | Microflown AVISA | Acoustic battlefield drone detection | $15M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 60 | Skylock | Multi-layer counter-UAS systems | $19M–$28M | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Implied | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 61 | NQDefense | Integrated anti-drone security products | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 62 | Defendec | Remote border surveillance sensors | $15M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | Nordic Air Defence | Swedish drone interceptor platform | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | COPTRZ | Commercial drone services provider | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 65 | Dronehub | Autonomous drone docking stations | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $520K | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Airobotics | Autonomous drone systems | $15M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $101M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | AirShare | Drone interceptor control systems | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $220K | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | CPM Elettronica | RF jamming counter-UAV systems | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 69 | FIONSYSTEMS | Integrated AI anti-drone systems | $7M–$15M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 70 | Vyomastra | Anti-drone radar and UAV systems | $8M–$13M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 71 | IIO Technologies | Indigenous counter-drone defence systems | $6M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 72 | Senhive | Drone detection sensors | $7M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $770K | Strong Confidence |
| 73 | Thermopylae Aerospace | Low-cost interceptor drones | $7M–$12M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 74 | Armory | Indigenous counter-drone systems | $6M–$11M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 75 | Dabin Systems | RF counter-drone detection systems | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 76 | Drone Major Group | Drone consultancy and supplier network | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 77 | SkeyDrone | Drone traffic management software | $5M–$10M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $550K | Partial Confidence |
| 78 | ParaZero Technologies | Drone safety and C-UAS systems | $7M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $26M | Strong Confidence |
| 79 | Hawking Defence Services | Indian anti-drone systems | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 80 | DSE Technologies | Homeland anti-drone systems | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 81 | Fly4Future | Autonomous aerial robotics systems | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 82 | ApolloShield Anti-Drone Systems | Drone detection and blocking | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $625K | Partial Confidence |
| 83 | Zebu | Counter-drone unmanned systems | $4M–$7M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 84 | Unnayan Tech | Handheld counter-drone defence products | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 85 | Sentradel | Kinetic small-drone defense | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 86 | Sharang Shakti | Airspace surveillance defence robotics | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $600K | Strong Confidence |
| 87 | GINA Software | Tactical mapping coordination software | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 88 | Edgeforce | Defence technology for security forces | $4M–$6M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $820K | Partial Confidence |
| 89 | Shotling | Kinetic anti-FPV shotgun system | $3M–$6M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $800K | Partial Confidence |
| 90 | Swiss Aerobotics | Netgun interceptor drones | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 91 | BizGarden | Drone-security project services | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 92 | Prime Anti-Drone | Integrated anti-drone systems | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 93 | AerialX | Kinetic drone interception systems | $1M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Probotek | Drone operations and AI | $1M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 95 | Bluvec | RF drone detection | $0 | Full Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Observed | $0 | Full Confidence |

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, compares the 2026 size of the counter-UAS market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the counter-UAS market
Insights
- CHAOS Industries alone represents about 20% of the full counter-UAS valuation pool in this dataset, which shows how fast defense sensing can concentrate category value.
- The top 10 counter-UAS companies capture about 74% of total valuation, so the market is already forming a clear leader group despite having many smaller specialists.
- Only five counter-UAS startups in the list are valued at $1B or more, but those five companies account for most of the visible institutional value in the category.
- Public counter-UAS exposure is uneven. Zen Technologies and DroneShield sit near $1.9B, while ParaZero Technologies is closer to $7M, so public listing status alone does not signal scale.
- Hardware-heavy categories dominate the top of the ranking. Directed energy, sensing, autonomous weapons and interceptors attract more value than lighter coordination or marketplace software.
- Dedrone’s roughly $500M acquisition value is meaningful, but the number is still far below newer private counter-UAS leaders, which suggests strategic exits may lag private round expansion.
- Seed and early-stage counter-UAS startups remain much smaller. Companies such as Aurelius Systems, Zebu and Shotling show momentum, but valuations are still far below late-stage defense hardware leaders.

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, shows why DroneShield is winning in counter-UAS
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the counter-UAS market based on their current valuation.
Estimating counter-UAS startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a counter-UAS company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a counter-UAS startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, or customer traction, combined with valuation multiples from comparable companies in the same market.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, defense contract activity, product traction, or deployment signals.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each counter-UAS startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency, and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the counter-UAS market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our counter-UAS market deck, shows annual funding in counter-UAS startups
Related blog posts
- The most recent news in the counter-UAS market
- The most recent funding news in the counter-UAS market
- The latest update in the counter-UAS market
- The evolution of funding activity in the counter-UAS market
- The main fundraising trends in the counter-UAS market
- How big is the counter-UAS market today?
- A complete list of business models in the counter-UAS market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.