Cybersecurity Startup Funding 2025-2026

What are all the funding deals in the cybersecurity market from August 2025 to July 2026?

The table below lists every disclosed equity round raised by pure-play cybersecurity companies between August 2025 and July 2026. We count as “pure-play” cybersecurity companies those where more than 80% of activity is dedicated to protecting digital systems, data, and users from cyber threats.

Each row shows the company, what it does, its category, the deal date, the funding stage, the round size, the region, the main investors, and the announcement source.

How active has fundraising been in the cybersecurity market?

As of July 2026, fundraising in the cybersecurity market has been very active across the 12 months. Companies raised 87 disclosed equity rounds and $3.95B combined, which works out to 7.91 deals per month.

The deal-count signal is broad rather than sporadic. The median month had 9 disclosed rounds, which means the cybersecurity market kept producing visible financing activity through the window.

Dollar flow is less even than deal flow. The market averaged $358.69M raised per month, while the median month was $255.01M, showing that a few large months lifted the annual total.

The 87 deals came from 85 unique companies, so repeated fundraising did not fully dominate the activity count. This confirms that cybersecurity continues to produce many fundable companies, not just repeated rounds from the same few vendors.

How concentrated has fundraising been in the cybersecurity market?

As of July 2026, fundraising in the cybersecurity market is concentrated, but not as extreme as a single-winner market. Across the 12 months, the top deal accounts for 17.74% of disclosed capital, the top 3 deals reach 32.69%, and the top 10 deals reach 55.25%.

Saviynt’s $700M Series B is the largest explanatory deal in the dataset. It alone represents nearly one-fifth of all disclosed cybersecurity capital raised during the period.

The top 5 deals account for 42.48% of disclosed capital. That means headline funding totals are heavily shaped by a small group of large rounds, even though the broader market had 87 deals.

This concentration matters because the median company did not raise anywhere close to the headline average. The median round was $20M, while the average round was $45.35M.

How much of the cybersecurity funding signal is driven by outliers?

As of July 2026, a meaningful part of the cybersecurity funding signal is driven by outliers. Over the 12 months, 20 rounds were $50M or larger, and 7 rounds were above $100M.

Those large rounds represent only 20.69% and 8.05% of deal count respectively. Yet they dominate interpretation because they push the average round size far above the median.

Capital raised excluding rounds above $50M was $1.25B. That is still substantial, but it is far below the full $3.95B total, which shows how much large rounds drive the dollar story.

The right reading is simple: the cybersecurity market is broad on deal count, but platform-scale rounds control the funding narrative.

Is the cybersecurity market broad with many targets, or narrow with few fundable companies?

As of July 2026, the cybersecurity market is broad with many fundable targets. Across the 12 months, 87 disclosed deals were raised by 85 unique companies, which means the dataset is not just a small group re-raising repeatedly.

The category spread also supports the broad-market reading. Identity Security produced 30 deals, Application Security produced 23, Managed Security Services produced 14, Endpoint Security produced 9, Cloud Security produced 8, and Network Security produced 3.

That breadth does not mean every category is equally investable. Identity, cloud, and managed security services all captured more capital share than deal share, while application, endpoint, and network security captured less.

So the cybersecurity market has many targets, but investors still separate broad experimentation from high-conviction scale opportunities. The market is broad at the top of funnel and selective at the scale-up stage.

Is cybersecurity mostly an early-stage formation market or a late-stage scaling market?

As of July 2026, the cybersecurity market is active at early stage but dollar-led by late-stage scaling. Over the 12 months, Seed and Series A rounds represented 64.37% of deals but only 27.55% of disclosed capital.

Seed rounds show that company formation is healthy. They made up 24 of 87 deals, but raised only $300.18M, which equals 7.61% of total capital.

Series B is the main capital inflection point in the cybersecurity market. It represented 14 deals, or 16.09% of activity, but captured $1.94B, or 49.21% of disclosed capital.

Late-stage and growth rounds together captured $2.50B across just 19 deals. That means the market rewards companies that move beyond early validation with disproportionately large follow-on checks.

Which categories attract the most investor attention in cybersecurity?

As of July 2026, Identity Security attracts the most investor attention in the cybersecurity market. Across the 12 months, the category generated 30 deals and $1.80B, equal to 34.48% of deals and 45.73% of capital.

Application Security ranks second by deal count, with 23 disclosed rounds. But it captured only $641.5M, which means it is more active as an experimentation category than as a large-check category.

Managed Security Services ranks third by deal count but second by capital. Its 14 deals raised $739.76M, showing investor interest in AI-SOC, MDR, automated threat hunting, and detection workflows.

Cloud Security has fewer deals, with only 8 rounds, but still raised $462M. That suggests investors prefer fewer but more ambitious cloud-security platforms rather than a large number of smaller bets.

Which categories attract disproportionately large checks in the cybersecurity market?

As of July 2026, Identity Security attracts disproportionately large checks in the cybersecurity market. Over the 12 months, its capital-share-to-deal-share ratio was 1.33, the highest in the dataset.

Cloud Security also attracts larger checks than its deal count suggests. It held 9.20% of deals but 11.71% of capital, producing a 1.27 ratio and a $57.75M average round size.

Managed Security Services shows a similar but slightly softer pattern. It held 16.09% of deals and 18.75% of capital, helped by large TENEX, Exaforce, Artemis, and Sweet Security rounds.

Application Security, Endpoint Security, and Network Security all under-index on capital share. That suggests investors see many useful products there, but fewer obvious platform-scale winners.

Which geographies matter most for fundraising in the cybersecurity market?

As of July 2026, North America matters most for fundraising in the cybersecurity market. Across the 12 months, it captured 50 deals and $2.90B, equal to 57.47% of deals and 73.62% of disclosed capital.

The Middle East is the second-largest geography in the dataset. It produced 19 deals and $764.2M, representing 21.84% of deals and 19.37% of capital, mostly driven by Israeli cybersecurity companies.

Europe is visible but smaller in dollar terms. It produced 12 deals, or 13.79% of activity, but only $182.1M, or 4.62% of disclosed capital.

Asia-Pacific and Latin America are much smaller in this filtered sample. Asia-Pacific raised $82.56M across 5 deals, while Latin America had one qualifying deal worth $12M.

Is the cybersecurity opportunity set broad or concentrated in one hub?

As of July 2026, the cybersecurity opportunity set is broad across companies but concentrated in one dominant hub. North America alone captured 73.62% of disclosed capital over the 12 months.

The difference between North America’s deal share and capital share is important. It produced 57.47% of deals but 73.62% of dollars, which means the largest rounds remain concentrated in the North American ecosystem.

The Middle East is the only other major hub in this dataset. Its 19 deals and $764.2M show a deep cybersecurity financing base, especially around Israeli identity, cloud, appsec, and detection companies.

Europe has a reasonable number of deals but smaller checks. Its median round was $13.1M, compared with $28M in North America and $20M in the Middle East.

Who are the investors that appear the most in cybersecurity fundraising?

As of July 2026, the repeat-investor signal in the cybersecurity market is real but should be interpreted carefully. The dataset identifies several investors with more than one disclosed deal, but individual check sizes are usually not disclosed.

Repeat names include Accel, Bain Capital or Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Brightmind Partners, Crosspoint Capital, Felicis, Greylock, Insight Partners, Norwest Venture Partners, Paladin Capital Group, SYN Ventures, Ten Eleven Ventures, and YL Ventures.

Who is the author of this content?

NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM

We track new markets so founders and investors can move faster

We build living "market pitch" documents for emerging markets: AI, synthetic biology, new proteins, and more. Instead of outdated PDFs or hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what's really happening: key players, deals, regulations, and signals that matter. Learn more about us.