What are the top cybersecurity startups by revenue today?

Whether you're building or investing in the cybersecurity market, our report covers everything you need to know: the players, the money, and what's coming next.
Summary
Tanium is the largest independent private cybersecurity company in this ranking at more than $700 million ARR, while Cato Networks leads the newer generation with more than $415 million ARR.
The word “startup” changes the answer more than the revenue data does. Tanium was founded in 2007 and Arctic Wolf has already grown into a very large private security company, so Cato is the cleaner number one if the comparison is limited to the newer venture-backed generation.
There is now a surprisingly crowded group just below the leaders. 1Password has passed $400 million ARR, while Snyk, Vanta, Saviynt and ReliaQuest have all crossed $300 million.
Cybersecurity has produced far more $200 million-plus private companies than most software categories. Huntress is above $250 million, Keeper Security is at $225 million, and Axonius, Keyfactor and Abnormal AI have all moved beyond $200 million.
Identity security has the deepest bench. 1Password, Saviynt, Keeper and Keyfactor all appear near the top, helped by the shift from securing employee logins to securing machines, workloads, service accounts, credentials and AI agents as well. The identity bench has several strong names, and the market grids in our cybersecurity market report place each one by what it does.
The fastest-growing companies are not necessarily the youngest. Vanta moved from $200 million to more than $300 million ARR in nine months, Axonius doubled from $100 million to $200 million in two years, and Cato added at least $65 million after already passing $350 million.
AI-native cybersecurity is growing quickly, but it has not displaced the established revenue leaders. Cyera has already moved above $150 million ARR and Abnormal AI above $200 million, yet the top of the ranking is still dominated by companies that spent years building enterprise distribution.
Acquisitions have materially changed the table. Wiz is now part of Google Cloud and Armis is part of ServiceNow, removing two companies that would otherwise sit close to the top of the independent ranking.
ARR also needs to stay labeled as ARR. A company ending the year at $300 million ARR may have recognized less than $300 million of accounting revenue, and the economics of managed security, network services and pure SaaS are not identical.
Cato and 1Password are currently the independent companies closest to the next major threshold of $500 million ARR. Behind them, Vanta’s recent acceleration makes the $300 million tier worth watching rather than treating it as a static group.
The broader picture is that cybersecurity has become large enough to support several private companies at hundreds of millions of dollars in recurring revenue at the same time. Tanium leads the broad private-company list; Cato is the strongest current answer if “startup” means the newer generation most people have in mind.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us

In our report covering the cybersecurity market, we turn what is vague and complex into simple, useful visuals. Market maps like this one show you at a glance where every startup stands.
The ranking of top startups in the cybersecurity market by revenue
Below is a table ranking all the companies in this market by their current revenue scale. You can find our methodology at the end of this page.
If you want a deeper understanding of the market and its current dynamics, get our report covering the Cybersecurity Market.
| Ranking | Company | Latest Metric | Metric Type | Freshness | Disclosed When | Source Quality | Confidence | Segment | Why This Ranking | Local Metric | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Security | >$20B | Annual Revenue | Historical · 45mo | Jan 25, 2023 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Enterprise Security Platform | Historical, but the disclosed floor is still dramatically above every newer figure found. | us | |
| 2 | Palo Alto Networks | $11.5B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Very Fresh · 3mo | Sep 1, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Enterprise Security Platform | Largest very-fresh whole-company cybersecurity revenue disclosure found. | us | |
| 3 | Cisco Security | $8.23B | Segment Revenue | Very Fresh · 3mo | Sep 2, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Network & Security Platform | Clean audited security-product figure, but below Palo Alto's current cyber-focused total. | us | |
| 4 | Fortinet | $6.8B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 5, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Network Security / SASE | Recent recognized revenue with a clean cybersecurity perimeter. | us | |
| 5 | CrowdStrike | $4.81B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 3, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Endpoint / XDR | Strong, recent recognized revenue; below Fortinet on scale. | us | |
| 6 | Zscaler | $3.35B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Very Fresh · 3mo | Sep 3, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Zero Trust / Cloud Security | Extremely current direct revenue, narrowly ahead of Gen's cyber segment. | us | |
| 7 | Gen Digital | $3.34B | Segment Revenue | Fresh · 7mo | May 7, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Consumer Cyber Safety | Uses only Cyber Safety Platform revenue, excluding non-cyber trust businesses. | us | |
| 8 | Okta | $2.92B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 4, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Identity Security | Clean current identity-security revenue. | us | |
| 9 | Check Point Software | $2.73B | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 12, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Network & Cloud Security | Current audited revenue, slightly below Okta. | il | |
| 10 | Akamai Security | $2.24B | Segment Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 19, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Cloud & Application Security | Direct security revenue receives more weight than larger ARR figures below. | us | |
| 11 | Proofpoint | $2.45B | ARR | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 9, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Human-Centric / Email Security | Nominally above Akamai, but ranked lower because it is ARR rather than recognized revenue. | us | |
| 12 | Thales Cyber | >$2.16B | Cyber Sales | Aging · 22mo | Mar 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Cybersecurity Products & Services | Strong direct sales figure, penalized for being a 2024 operating figure. | >€2B | fr |
| 13 | Trend Micro | ~$1.85B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Endpoint / Enterprise Security | Recent recognized revenue with a clean cybersecurity business. | JPY 276B | jp |
| 14 | Orange Cyberdefense | ~$1.47B | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Managed Security Services | Dedicated cybersecurity subsidiary with a current revenue figure. | €1.3B | fr |
| 15 | CyberArk | $1.36B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Identity Security | Clean standalone revenue; now overlaps Palo Alto's corporate perimeter. | il | |
| 16 | Rubrik | $1.32B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 12, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Data Security / Cyber Resilience | Recent recognized revenue; strict inclusion because the offering is explicitly data security. | us | |
| 17 | Exclusive Networks | ~$1.69B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Historical · 34mo | Feb 29, 2024 | Filed / Audited | Medium | Cybersecurity Distribution | Larger nominal revenue than several above, but over 30 months old. | €1.56B | fr |
| 18 | GuidePoint Security | $2.3B | Gross Revenue | Aging · 22mo | 2025 | Credible Reported | Low | Cybersecurity Services / Reseller | Very large topline, but gross revenue is less comparable with software-company net revenue. | us | |
| 19 | SailPoint | $1.07B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 18, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Identity Security | Current billion-dollar recognized revenue. | us | |
| 20 | Trellix | $1.7B | Annual Revenue | Historical · 46mo | 2022 | Company Disclosed | Low | Endpoint / XDR | Large but substantially stale; Skyhigh separation makes current comparability weaker. | us | |
| 21 | McAfee | $1.92B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Historical · 58mo | Feb 23, 2022 | Filed / Audited | Low | Consumer Cybersecurity | Excellent historical evidence but far too old to outrank fresher ~$1B companies. | us | |
| 22 | SentinelOne | $1B | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 12, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Endpoint / XDR | Recently crossed $1B in recognized annual revenue. | us | |
| 23 | Tenable | $999M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 4, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Exposure / Vulnerability Management | Nearly $1B of current recognized revenue. | us | |
| 24 | Sophos | >$1B | Annual Revenue | Historical · 32mo | Feb 2024 | Company Disclosed | Low | Endpoint / MDR | Nominally over $1B, but stale; current combined Sophos/Secureworks revenue is not disclosed. | gb | |
| 25 | Ping Identity | $1B | ARR | Very Fresh · 5mo | May 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | Identity Security | Very current $1B ARR evidence, but ARR remains below similarly sized direct revenue. | us | |
| 26 | Wiz | $1B | ARR | Fresh · 10mo | 2025 | Credible Reported | Medium | Cloud Security | Recent standalone ARR; corporate ownership makes current perimeter less clean. | us | |
| 27 | Rapid7 | $860M | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 10, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Exposure Detection & Response | Current recognized revenue outweighs nearby ARR-only evidence. | us | |
| 28 | Kaspersky | $836M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Mar 30, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Endpoint / Enterprise Security | Current whole-company cybersecurity revenue. | ru | |
| 29 | ESET | ~$828M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Jun 18, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Endpoint / Enterprise Security | Very fresh direct revenue; currency makes it broadly comparable with Kaspersky. | €733M | sk |
| 30 | Darktrace | $818M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 16mo | Mar 14, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Network Detection & Response | Strong filed revenue, though the operating period is less current than peers immediately above. | gb | |
| 31 | Optiv | ~$800M | Sales | Very Fresh · 1mo | 2026 | Company Disclosed | Low | Cybersecurity Advisory & Solutions | Large company-disclosed scale, but period and sales accounting are not clearly specified. | us | |
| 32 | Netskope | $709M | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Fresh · 9mo | Mar 11, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | SASE / Cloud Security | Current direct revenue. | us | |
| 33 | Qualys | $669M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 5, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Exposure / Vulnerability Management | Direct fresh revenue puts it above similarly scaled proxy-based companies. | us | |
| 34 | Varonis | $624M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Data Security | Uses recognized revenue, not the higher $745M ARR. | us | |
| 35 | Bitdefender | $480M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | Endpoint / Consumer Security | Recognized revenue receives more weight than ~$500M ARR immediately below. | ro | |
| 36 | Delinea | $500M | ARR | Fresh · 7mo | 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | Privileged Access Management | Fresher than KnowBe4's similar ARR, but still ARR rather than revenue. | us | |
| 37 | KnowBe4 | >$500M | ARR | Aging · 19mo | Mar 25, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Security Awareness | Strong ARR milestone, but now materially older than Delinea's. | us | |
| 38 | 1Password | >$400M | ARR | Fresh · 11mo | Nov 6, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Identity / Password Security | Recent company-disclosed ARR. | ca | |
| 39 | BeyondTrust | $400M | ARR | Aging · 27mo | Jul 2024 | Company Disclosed | Low | Privileged Access Management | Comparable ARR to 1Password but much older. | us | |
| 40 | Arctic Wolf | ~$438M | ARR | Historical · 34mo | 2024 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | MDR / Security Operations | Larger nominal figure, but both old and estimated. | us | |
| 41 | Cato Networks | >$350M | ARR | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 24, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Network Security / SASE | Fresh, company-disclosed ARR provides stronger current evidence than Secureworks' old revenue. | il | |
| 42 | Secureworks | $366M | Fiscal-Year Revenue | Historical · 32mo | Mar 2024 | Filed / Audited | Low | XDR / MDR | Audited standalone revenue, but over 30 months old and no longer an independent perimeter. | us | |
| 43 | NCC Group Cyber Security | ~$317M | Segment Revenue | Fresh · 17mo | 2025 | Filed / Audited | High | Cybersecurity Services | Current cyber-only segment revenue beats weaker ~$300M ARR/estimate evidence below. | £239M | gb |
| 44 | Radware | $302M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | DDoS / Application Security | Clean current recognized revenue. | il | |
| 45 | Vanta | >$300M | ARR | Very Fresh · 6mo | Apr 29, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Security Compliance / Trust | Very recent ARR milestone. | us | |
| 46 | Saviynt | $300M | ARR | Very Fresh · 3mo | Jul 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Identity Security | One of the freshest $300M ARR disclosures. | us | |
| 47 | Snyk | >$300M | ARR | Fresh · 10mo | 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Application Security | Strong company ARR disclosure, but less precisely dated than Saviynt. | us | |
| 48 | Armis | >$300M | ARR | Fresh · 14mo | Aug 4, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Asset / CPS Security | Current-enough ARR; standalone evidence remains useful despite later ownership changes. | us | |
| 49 | ReliaQuest | >$300M | ARR | Fresh · 18mo | Apr 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | MDR / Security Operations | Direct ARR milestone, though older than the $300M peers above. | us | |
| 50 | Claroty | >$300M | Revenue Run-Rate | Very Fresh · 5mo | May 19, 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | OT / CPS Security | Extremely recent run-rate but weaker than formally disclosed ARR or annual revenue. | us | |
| 51 | A10 Networks | $291M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 4, 2026 | Filed / Audited | Medium | Application / Network Security | Strong direct revenue, but perimeter is slightly broader than pure security. | us | |
| 52 | Huntress | $250M | ARR | Very Fresh · 3mo | Jul 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | MDR / Managed Security | Very current ARR, well ahead of most recently funded MDR vendors. | us | |
| 53 | Keeper Security | $225M | ARR | Very Fresh · 3mo | Jul 9, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Identity / Password Security | Extremely current and directly disclosed. | us | |
| 54 | Barracuda Networks | ~$237M | Estimated Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | Email / Network Security | Larger nominal number than Keeper, but substantially weaker evidence. | us | |
| 55 | Keyfactor | >$200M | ARR | Very Fresh · 1mo | Sep 9, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | PKI / Machine Identity | One of the newest commercial-scale disclosures in the funding cohort. | us | |
| 56 | Axonius | >$200M | ARR | Very Fresh · 6mo | May 19, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Asset / Exposure Management | Very current company ARR milestone. | us | |
| 57 | Abnormal AI | $200M | ARR | Aging · 26mo | Aug 6, 2024 | Company Disclosed | Low | Human-Centric / Email Security | Strong direct milestone, but substantially older than Keyfactor and Axonius. | us | |
| 58 | OneSpan | $178M | Security Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Identity / Transaction Security | Direct current security-segment revenue. | us | |
| 59 | F-Secure | ~$165M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Consumer Cybersecurity | Current recognized revenue, more comparable than nearby ARR. | €146M | fi |
| 60 | Cyera | >$150M | ARR | Very Fresh · 4mo | Jun 2, 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | Data Security | Extremely current ARR from a recently funded hypergrowth company. | us | |
| 61 | eSentire | ~$150M | ARR | Aging · 26mo | Aug 13, 2024 | Credible Reported | Low | MDR / Managed Security | Credible commercial figure, but now aging. | ca | |
| 62 | Checkmarx | $150M | ARR | Fresh · 12mo | Oct 2025 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Application Security | Fresh ARR milestone. | us | |
| 63 | WithSecure | ~$126M | Annual Revenue | Aging · 22mo | 2025 | Filed / Audited | Medium | Endpoint / MDR | Direct audited revenue gets meaningful weight despite an older operating period. | €116M | fi |
| 64 | Expel | ~$142M | Estimated Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | 2026 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | MDR / Security Operations | Fresher but estimated, so it does not automatically outrank audited WithSecure revenue. | us | |
| 65 | Nozomi Networks | $102M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Sep 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | OT / IoT Security | Fresh direct revenue outranks larger but estimated/older figures below. | us | |
| 66 | SecurityScorecard | ~$106M | Estimated Revenue | Historical · 36mo | Apr 1, 2026 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | Cyber Risk Ratings | Number is older and reconstructed rather than a current company disclosure. | us | |
| 67 | Pentera | >$100M | ARR | Fresh · 9mo | Jan 6, 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Automated Security Validation | Recent ARR milestone from a recently financed scale-up. | il | |
| 68 | Semperis | >$100M | ARR | Aging · 21mo | Jan 30, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Low | Identity Resilience | Clean ARR milestone, but more than 18 months old. | us | |
| 69 | Drata | >$100M | ARR | Aging · 22mo | Feb 19, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Low | Security Compliance | Later growth disclosures exist but do not give a newer absolute revenue number. | us | |
| 70 | BigID | ~$108M | Estimated ARR | Aging · 22mo | 2025 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | Data Security | Estimated rather than company-disclosed, keeping it below $100M direct milestones. | us | |
| 71 | Coro | ~$100M | Estimated ARR | Historical · 31mo | Mar 28, 2024 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | SMB Cybersecurity Platform | Company declined to confirm the estimate; precision is weak. | us | |
| 72 | HUMAN Security | ~$100M | ARR | Historical · 46mo | Jun 21, 2023 | Credible Reported | Low | Bot / Fraud Defense | Useful historical scale signal, but too old to carry much current-ranking weight. | us | |
| 73 | Island | $80M | Annualized Revenue | Aging · 22mo | 2025 | Credible Reported | Low | Enterprise Browser Security | Stronger than a user-count proxy, but the run-rate is now aging. | us | |
| 74 | Verimatrix | $46.5M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Mar 2026 | Company Disclosed | Medium | Application / Content Security | Fresh direct revenue; perimeter includes digital-content protection. | fr | |
| 75 | WALLIX | ~$45.9M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 5, 2026 | Company Disclosed | High | Privileged Access Management | Fresh direct cybersecurity revenue beats similarly sized ARR and older revenue below. | €40.6M | fr |
| 76 | Chainguard | $40M | ARR | Fresh · 18mo | Apr 23, 2025 | Company Disclosed | Low | Software Supply-Chain Security | The later $100M figure discussed publicly was a target, so the disclosed $40M is retained. | us | |
| 77 | Tines | $39.6M | Annual Revenue | Aging · 21mo | May 28, 2026 | Credible Reported | Medium | Security Automation / SOAR | Actual revenue is preferred to much higher third-party estimates. | ie | |
| 78 | Corero Network Security | $25.5M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Mar 24, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | DDoS Security | Fresh audited revenue. | gb | |
| 79 | SSH Communications Security | ~$24.4M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Feb 17, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Zero Trust / Quantum-Safe Security | Fresh recognized revenue, essentially similar in scale to Corero after currency effects. | €21.6M | fi |
| 80 | Clavister | ~$22.3M | Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Apr 27, 2026 | Filed / Audited | High | Network / Defense Cybersecurity | Fresh audited revenue, but smaller than the firms immediately above after currency normalization. | SEK 219M | se |
| 81 | Aikido Security | ~$13M | Estimated Annual Revenue | Fresh · 10mo | Sep 15, 2026 | Third-Party Estimate | Low | Application Security | Included because of recent funding and market relevance, but the only absolute figure found is an estimate. | be |

Our research about cybersecurity companies gets updated several times a month, so you always get the latest view of where things stand.
Which cybersecurity startups make the most revenue today?
Tanium still leads the broad private-company ranking at more than $700 million ARR, while Cato Networks is currently the biggest of the newer cybersecurity startups with more than $415 million ARR.
The definition of “startup” changes the top of this list. Tanium was founded in 2007 and Arctic Wolf is already a large, mature private security company. Include businesses of that age and Tanium sits first, with Arctic Wolf also around the $600 million level based on public evidence from former senior employees.
Among the younger independent companies, Cato is ahead. It has passed $415 million ARR, followed by 1Password at more than $400 million. Snyk, Vanta, Saviynt and ReliaQuest have all crossed $300 million. Huntress is above $250 million, Keeper Security has reached $225 million, and Axonius, Keyfactor and Abnormal AI are above $200 million.
Two famous names have disappeared from the independent ranking. Google has completed its acquisition of Wiz, while ServiceNow has completed its acquisition of Armis. Their standalone revenue history is still useful for understanding the market, but they are no longer independent cybersecurity startups.
| Company | Latest useful commercial figure | Metric | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanium | >$700M | ARR | Private |
| Arctic Wolf | ~$600M | Revenue/ARR scale reported by former executives | Private |
| Cato Networks | >$415M | ARR | Private |
| 1Password | >$400M | ARR | Private |
| Snyk | >$300M | ARR | Private |
| Vanta | >$300M | ARR | Private |
| Saviynt | >$300M | ARR | Private |
| ReliaQuest | >$300M | ARR | Private |
| Huntress | >$250M | ARR | Private |
| Keeper Security | $225M | ARR | Private |
| Axonius | >$200M | ARR | Private |
| Keyfactor | >$200M | ARR | Private |
| Abnormal AI | >$200M | ARR | Private |
| Cyera | >$150M | ARR | Private |
| Pentera | >$100M | ARR | Private |
Who leads if we include older private cybersecurity companies like Tanium and Arctic Wolf?
Tanium is the clearest leader, while Arctic Wolf also appears substantially larger than most of the younger cybersecurity unicorns.
Tanium's own corporate material puts annual recurring revenue above $700 million, alongside a roughly $9 billion valuation and around 1,900 employees. At that size, calling Tanium a startup sounds increasingly strange, even though it remains an independent private technology company. Whether a company as large as Tanium still counts as a startup is the kind of line we draw in our report on cybersecurity.
Arctic Wolf is harder to pin down because the company has not published an equally clean current ARR milestone. Former senior employees have publicly described the business as reaching roughly $600 million in scale. We therefore keep Arctic Wolf near the top, but with lower confidence than Tanium or Cato.
If “startup” means any large independent venture-backed cybersecurity company, Tanium leads. If we mean the newer generation that has scaled during the last decade, Cato is currently the cleaner answer.

In our market report about cybersecurity companies, we look at what the winners do differently, so you can learn from the best instead of guessing.
Is Cato Networks the biggest newer cybersecurity startup right now?
Cato Networks is currently the strongest revenue leader among the newer independent cybersecurity companies, with more than $415 million ARR.
Cato had already crossed $350 million ARR before reporting a new milestone above $415 million with 42% year-over-year growth. It added at least $65 million of recurring revenue in a relatively short period while already operating at substantial scale.
The company now serves more than 4,000 enterprise customers. Its SASE platform combines networking and cybersecurity functions that companies previously bought across VPNs, firewalls, secure web gateways and other products, giving Cato access to unusually large enterprise contracts.
The $415 million disclosure also moves Cato beyond the crowded $300 million group. 1Password remains close above $400 million, but Cato has the fresher public number and is still reporting growth above 40%.
Is 1Password still mostly a password-manager business?
1Password has become a $400 million-plus ARR identity-security company, with enterprise customers now driving most of the business.
The password manager remains the product many people associate with 1Password, but the company has pushed deeper into business identity security, device access, secrets management and the growing problem of machine and AI identities.
1Password announced that ARR had surpassed $400 million while the company remained free-cash-flow positive. It also said more than three-quarters of revenue came from business customers and that the platform served roughly 180,000 organizations.
The company had disclosed $250 million ARR in 2023, so it added at least $150 million between those milestones.
Cato has since edged ahead on the latest public figures, but 1Password remains one of the very few independent cybersecurity companies above $400 million ARR.
How much revenue does Snyk make today?
Snyk has surpassed $300 million ARR, putting the developer-security company firmly in cybersecurity's top private-company tier.
Snyk says it now serves more than 4,500 customers, including roughly one-third of the Fortune 500. Snyk Code alone contributes about $100 million ARR, showing how much the business has expanded beyond its original open-source vulnerability product.
The company now covers code, dependencies, containers, cloud infrastructure, APIs and AI-generated software. AI coding tools are creating much more code without giving security teams a proportional increase in headcount, which gives products like Snyk a wider job to do.
Snyk received enormous attention during the high-valuation SaaS years, so its valuation history can distract from the operating business. Today the simpler fact is that it has built more than $300 million of recurring revenue.

In our document detailing everything you need to know about cybersecurity, you will always find fresh funding data, taken straight from our own verified funding database.
Has Vanta become a major cybersecurity company?
Vanta has become a major private cybersecurity business, crossing $300 million ARR after adding roughly $100 million in only nine months.
Its growth curve has accelerated as the company has become larger. Vanta says it took two years to move from $10 million to $100 million ARR, another 15 months to reach $200 million, then only nine months to pass $300 million.
The company also serves more than 16,000 customers. Vanta originally grew by automating compliance work such as SOC 2 evidence collection, but the product now stretches into continuous controls monitoring, vendor risk, security questionnaires and broader trust management. Which compliance chores buyers would pay to automate away is part of the customer picture we build in our market report about cybersecurity.
AI is expanding that workload too. Companies increasingly have to track fast-changing software, vendors and AI tools instead of preparing evidence once a year for an audit.
Calling Vanta a compliance automation startup now understates the size of the business.
Is Saviynt really as big as Vanta and Snyk now?
Saviynt has joined the $300 million-plus ARR group, putting the identity-security company in roughly the same revenue band as Vanta and Snyk.
Saviynt recently disclosed more than $300 million ARR, more than 80% growth in new customer acquisitions and a 96% customer-retention rate. Those figures came as the company expanded its platform around AI agents and other non-human identities.
Identity security now goes well beyond employee login. Companies have service accounts, applications, workloads, API credentials and AI agents that may all need controlled access to sensitive systems.
That gives Saviynt room to sell beyond traditional identity governance. Its products increasingly combine identity governance, privileged access and controls for machines and autonomous software.
There is not enough precision in three separate “more than $300 million” disclosures to rank Saviynt, Snyk and Vanta exactly. They belong in the same broad revenue tier.
Is ReliaQuest really as large as the big cybersecurity software startups?
ReliaQuest has passed $300 million ARR and is profitable, giving it comparable top-line scale to several of the biggest private cybersecurity software companies.
The comparison needs some care because ReliaQuest combines software with managed security operations. Its GreyMatter platform brings together data and workflows from customers' existing security tools, while the company also provides operational expertise around detection and response.
ReliaQuest says ARR has grown more than fourfold since its earlier KKR investment, recently surpassing $300 million. The company was still growing above 30% annually when it disclosed that figure and said it was operating profitably.
The revenue economics differ from a pure SaaS vendor such as Vanta. For a ranking based on commercial scale, though, ReliaQuest clearly belongs in the $300 million group.

Learning from others' mistakes is the cheapest lesson there is. In our report covering the cybersecurity market, we look at what broke startups before you, so you don't repeat it.
How big is Huntress now?
Huntress has surpassed $250 million ARR while still growing 65% year over year.
The company now protects more than 270,000 businesses, 15 million identities and 5.5 million endpoints across more than 100 countries. Those numbers are unusually large for a private cybersecurity vendor built heavily around small and midsized businesses.
Huntress gets much of that reach through managed service providers. Instead of requiring every smaller business to build its own sophisticated security team, Huntress combines software with a managed security operation that can serve many customers at once.
The latest milestone puts Huntress clearly above most of the younger cybersecurity unicorn population on current revenue. It is also getting close enough to the $300 million tier that the next disclosure could reshuffle the middle of this ranking.
How large has Keeper Security become?
Keeper Security has reached $225 million ARR, putting it among the largest independent identity-security companies.
Keeper says ARR has more than tripled since 2021 and that more than 95,000 organizations now use its products. The company has expanded well beyond consumer password storage into privileged access, secrets management and access controls for machines and AI agents.
Enterprise identity contracts can become much larger than individual password-manager subscriptions, especially as companies try to control credentials spread across cloud systems and automated workloads. Enterprise identity contracts outgrowing individual password-manager subscriptions is the kind of business-model difference we compare in our report covering the cybersecurity market.
Keeper now sits below the $300 million identity companies but above most private vendors still trying to establish a $100 million-plus business.
Has Axonius really become a $200 million cybersecurity company?
Axonius has passed $200 million ARR after doubling its recurring revenue in two years.
The company created a business around a deceptively basic problem: large organizations often do not know exactly which devices, cloud resources, software, identities and other assets they have. Security teams cannot manage exposures reliably if the underlying inventory is incomplete.
Axonius says it now approaches 1,000 customers, including more than 100 Fortune 1000 companies and more than 90 U.S. federal agencies. The company also expects to become free-cash-flow positive in the near term.
Crossing $200 million ARR shows that asset intelligence has become a real cybersecurity category rather than a small supporting feature attached to larger security platforms.
Which cybersecurity startups are climbing the revenue ranking fastest?
Cato, Vanta, Huntress, Axonius and Keyfactor stand out because they are adding large amounts of recurring revenue after already reaching meaningful scale.
Cato moved from above $350 million ARR to above $415 million. Vanta added roughly $100 million in nine months. Huntress reached $250 million while growing 65%. Axonius doubled from $100 million to $200 million ARR in two years.
Keyfactor has followed a similar path. The machine-identity company says it took roughly five years to go from below $10 million to more than $100 million ARR, then only two additional years to double again beyond $200 million.
These absolute gains are more useful than percentage growth alone. Doubling a $10 million business is impressive; adding another $100 million once a company is already large tells us more about the depth of customer demand.
| Company | Earlier disclosed milestone | Latest disclosed milestone | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cato Networks | >$350M ARR | >$415M ARR | At least +$65M |
| Vanta | $200M ARR | >$300M ARR | >$100M in nine months |
| 1Password | $250M ARR | >$400M ARR | At least +$150M |
| Huntress | Lower prior base | >$250M ARR | 65% YoY growth at latest milestone |
| Axonius | >$100M ARR | >$200M ARR | Doubled in two years |
| Keyfactor | >$100M ARR | >$200M ARR | Doubled in roughly two years |
| Saviynt | Lower prior base | >$300M ARR | New customers +80% |

Your time is limited. In our research about cybersecurity companies, we put numbers on each part of the market, so you can see where it makes sense to focus.
Is Cyera already catching the $200 million cybersecurity startups?
Cyera has become one of the fastest-growing challengers, with ARR already above $150 million according to recent reporting.
TechCrunch reported the figure while covering Cyera's latest financing and said the company remained far from profitable as it invested aggressively in sales. The context is useful because Cyera's valuation has grown even faster than its revenue.
The underlying business is data security. As companies spread sensitive information across cloud platforms, SaaS applications and AI systems, they need to know where the data sits, who can reach it and how exposed it is.
Cyera has also been expanding through acquisitions, including a planned deal for non-human identity specialist Oasis Security. That pushes the company toward a wider data-and-identity platform rather than a single security product.
At more than $150 million ARR, Cyera has already moved beyond the early-stage category. It still has some distance to cover before joining Axonius, Keeper or Huntress.
What happened to Wiz and Armis in the cybersecurity startup ranking?
Wiz and Armis have both left the independent-startup ranking because their acquisitions are now complete.
Google completed its acquisition of Wiz and brought the company into Google Cloud while keeping the Wiz brand. Wiz had already become one of cybersecurity's fastest-growing businesses before the deal, so an older ranking would place it near the top.
ServiceNow has also completed its acquisition of Armis. Before that transaction, Armis had passed $300 million ARR after moving from $200 million in less than a year.
These exits change the ranking more than another funding round or small revenue update would. Two businesses that had reached the $300 million-plus range are now part of much larger public companies.
They also show something unusual about cybersecurity: a private company can reach several hundred million dollars of recurring revenue and still be acquired before going public. Private companies reaching hundreds of millions in revenue and still being bought before going public is a signal we watch every quarter in our cybersecurity market report.
Which cybersecurity category has produced the most large private companies?
Identity security currently has the deepest bench of large independent companies, although network security has the biggest younger individual company in Cato.
1Password exceeds $400 million ARR. Saviynt exceeds $300 million. Keeper has reached $225 million, while Keyfactor has crossed $200 million. Identity-related businesses therefore occupy several positions near the top of the private-company ranking.
The category is expanding because companies increasingly need to secure identities that are not employees. Machine accounts, workloads, service identities, API credentials and AI agents can all access corporate systems.
Other categories still produce very large companies. Cato has passed $415 million in SASE and network security, Snyk exceeds $300 million in developer security, Vanta exceeds $300 million in trust and compliance, ReliaQuest exceeds $300 million in security operations, and Huntress exceeds $250 million in managed security.
| Category | Example company | Latest disclosed scale |
|---|---|---|
| SASE / network security | Cato Networks | >$415M ARR |
| Identity security | 1Password | >$400M ARR |
| Developer security | Snyk | >$300M ARR |
| Trust / compliance | Vanta | >$300M ARR |
| Identity governance | Saviynt | >$300M ARR |
| Security operations | ReliaQuest | >$300M ARR |
| Managed security | Huntress | >$250M ARR |
| Password / privileged access | Keeper Security | $225M ARR |
| Asset intelligence | Axonius | >$200M ARR |
| Machine identity | Keyfactor | >$200M ARR |
| Data security | Cyera | >$150M ARR |

In our market report about cybersecurity companies, we always try to gather several sources and make estimates that make sense, so you can work with solid numbers.
Are the biggest cybersecurity startups profitable yet?
A few large cybersecurity startups are already profitable or cash-flow positive, while some of the fastest growers are still spending heavily.
1Password says it is free-cash-flow positive at more than $400 million ARR. ReliaQuest said it was profitable while growing above 30%. Axonius is approaching positive free cash flow after passing $200 million ARR. Tanium has also operated with positive cash generation during parts of its development.
Cyera sits at the other end. TechCrunch reported that the company remained far from profitable despite ARR above $150 million because it was spending heavily to expand.
Funding totals can therefore be misleading. A startup that raises hundreds of millions of dollars may still have less revenue than a quieter company that grew with tighter spending.
For this ranking, funding is context rather than evidence of commercial scale.
Does ARR make cybersecurity startups look bigger than they really are?
ARR is useful for comparing private cybersecurity companies, but it should never be read as if it were audited annual revenue.
Annual recurring revenue measures the annualized value of recurring contracts at a point in time. A fast-growing company can end a year with $300 million ARR even though it recognized less than $300 million of accounting revenue during the year.
Business models also differ. ReliaQuest and Huntress include substantial managed-service components. Cato combines networking with security. Vanta sells compliance and trust software. 1Password has both business and consumer customers.
So we keep ARR labeled as ARR throughout the ranking. It gives a useful picture of commercial scale without pretending every recurring-revenue dollar has identical economics.
Are AI-native cybersecurity startups already catching the revenue leaders?
The newest AI-native cybersecurity startups are growing quickly, but most still sit well below the $200 million-plus leaders in actual revenue scale.
AI has made it possible for very young security companies to raise large rounds and win enterprise customers unusually fast. The gap between valuation and revenue can become enormous during the first few years. A wide gap between valuation and revenue is the kind of risk we rate by likelihood, less obvious ones included, in our report on cybersecurity.
Cyera is one of the strongest examples of a younger company already bridging that gap, with more than $150 million ARR. Abnormal AI reached more than $200 million ARR earlier in its development and remains another example of AI being used to build a sizeable security business.
Many newer companies focused on autonomous SOC agents, offensive security and AI-specific protection remain much smaller commercially even when their funding rounds receive comparable attention.
For now, the revenue ranking is still dominated by companies that have spent years building distribution, customer relationships and large recurring contract bases.

If you build or invest in the cybersecurity market, you need to know which business models pay off now and which ones are fading. That's why our report covering it has a whole section on it.
Why are so many cybersecurity startups getting past $200 million ARR?
Cybersecurity now contains enough large spending categories to support several $200 million-plus private companies at the same time.
Enterprise security budgets are spread across identity, cloud security, networking, application security, data security, managed detection, security operations, exposure management and compliance. A startup does not have to dominate the whole cybersecurity market to build a very large business.
AI is adding work to several of those categories. AI-generated code creates new application-security problems. AI agents create identity problems. Companies adopting AI tools create data, governance and compliance problems.
The scale of the current cohort makes the change obvious. Even after removing acquired companies such as Wiz and Armis, we can identify more than ten independent private cybersecurity vendors with credible evidence around or above $200 million in recurring revenue.
Which cybersecurity startups could cross $500 million ARR next?
Cato Networks and 1Password are closest to $500 million ARR, with Cato currently having the stronger recent growth evidence.
Cato already exceeds $415 million ARR and reported 42% year-over-year growth. Reaching $500 million therefore requires less than another $85 million from the latest disclosed milestone.
1Password has passed $400 million, although its public figure is older than Cato's. The company could be closer to $500 million than the disclosure suggests, but there is no reason to invent a current number before 1Password publishes one.
The next group starts above $300 million. Vanta is particularly interesting because it added approximately $100 million ARR in only nine months. Saviynt, Snyk and ReliaQuest also have enough scale to become $500 million businesses without needing several doublings.
Huntress is further back above $250 million, although 65% growth makes the gap less daunting than the raw number suggests.
So, what are the top cybersecurity startups by revenue today?
Tanium leads the broad private cybersecurity ranking, while Cato Networks is currently the strongest answer for the biggest newer independent cybersecurity startup.
Tanium has more than $700 million ARR. Arctic Wolf appears to be around the $600 million level, although its evidence is less formal. Cato has passed $415 million and 1Password more than $400 million. Snyk, Vanta, Saviynt and ReliaQuest form the next group above $300 million.
Below them, Huntress has passed $250 million, Keeper Security has reached $225 million, and Axonius, Keyfactor and Abnormal AI have crossed $200 million. Cyera is already above $150 million according to credible reporting, while Pentera has recently crossed $100 million.
The ranking has changed materially because Wiz and Armis are now owned by Google and ServiceNow. Once those acquired companies are removed, Cato sits at the top of the newer independent generation.
The cleanest current answer is Tanium under the broad definition of a private cybersecurity startup, and Cato Networks if we focus on the newer generation most readers have in mind when they search for cybersecurity startups.
Our methodology
This ranking compares cybersecurity startups and private scale-ups by the strongest recent evidence we could find for current commercial scale. Because private cybersecurity companies rarely publish audited annual revenue, the ranking relies heavily on ARR where that is the most recent company-disclosed figure.
We keep every financial metric in the form in which it was disclosed. ARR remains ARR, revenue remains revenue, and other operating metrics are not converted into synthetic revenue estimates. We do not multiply customer counts, prices, contract values or other operating data to create a number the company never reported.
When several figures existed for the same company, we prioritized the disclosure that best represented current revenue scale, with metric relevance first, then source quality and freshness. A recent but weak operating indicator did not automatically replace an older direct ARR or revenue disclosure.
The definition of “startup” is deliberately shown rather than hidden. Older independent private companies such as Tanium and Arctic Wolf remain in the broad ranking, but we also identify Cato Networks separately as the leader of the newer generation. Companies that have been acquired are removed from the current independent ranking even when their historical standalone revenue remains useful context.
We also checked what each number actually covered. Cybersecurity companies mix pure software, managed security, networking, identity products and operational services, so two companies with the same ARR can have different underlying economics. The ranking therefore measures commercial scale, not profitability, margins or business quality.
Key primary sources include Cato Networks for its more than $415 million ARR disclosure, 1Password for its more than $400 million ARR milestone, Snyk for its $300 million-plus ARR scale, Vanta for the move above $300 million ARR, Saviynt for its $300 million-plus ARR disclosure, and ReliaQuest for its ARR, growth and profitability figures.
Other important company disclosures include Huntress at more than $250 million ARR, Keeper Security at $225 million ARR, Axonius above $200 million ARR, Keyfactor above $200 million ARR, Abnormal AI above $200 million ARR, and Pentera above $100 million ARR.
For Cyera, we use TechCrunch's reporting on ARR and profitability. Corporate-status changes are based on Google Cloud's confirmation of the completed Wiz acquisition and ServiceNow's confirmation of the completed Armis acquisition. Tanium's historical scale and ARR trajectory are supported by Tanium's corporate disclosures.
The goal is not to pretend that ARR, recognized revenue and managed-service revenue are perfectly interchangeable. It is to give the clearest defensible view of how large today's independent cybersecurity companies have become while leaving the metric differences visible.

In our report covering the cybersecurity market, we don't want to repeat what boring consulting reports say. Instead, we show you the real and latest market signals that matter.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us