What are the fundraising trends in the deep tech market?
In our updated market reports, you will find everything you need
SUMMARY
We analyzed publicly disclosed equity rounds raised by pure-play deep tech companies from January 2024 through July 2026, keeping only disclosed rounds of $300K or more and companies where more than 80% of the business fits the deep tech market. The resulting sample covers 36 deals in 2024, 49 deals in 2025, and 64 deals in year-to-date 2026.
The deep tech market is accelerating sharply in 2026. After falling from $6.75B in 2024 to about $5.0B in 2025, disclosed capital has already reached about $9.59B in year-to-date 2026.
The 2026 rebound is stronger than the 2025 decline. Year-to-date 2026 capital is about 4.1x the comparable 2025 period, which makes the latest signal a real reacceleration rather than a small cyclical bounce.
But the recovery is not evenly distributed. The largest 2026 round, Isomorphic Labs at $2.1B, accounts for 21.9% of year-to-date capital, and the top 10 deals account for 68.7% of the total.
Deal formation is also expanding. The market moved from 36 deals in 2024 to 49 deals in 2025, then to 64 deals already in year-to-date 2026, so the category is broadening even as capital remains heavily concentrated.
Round-size interpretation requires care. In 2026, the average round is about $149.8M while the median is $50.0M, which means the average describes mega-round intensity more than ordinary fundraising conditions.
Semiconductor Technologies have the strongest broad momentum in the deep tech market. The category ranks first by year-to-date 2026 deal count and second by capital, which is a more durable signal than a category led mainly by one outlier.
Biotech Platforms lead year-to-date 2026 dollars with about $2.48B, but that leadership depends heavily on Isomorphic Labs. Without that one deal, the biotech signal would look less dominant.
North America remains the largest region, but the market is becoming less regionally concentrated. North America held 89.4% of capital in 2024 and 65.0% in year-to-date 2026, while Europe rose to 30.0% of capital despite only 12.5% of deals.
The practical interpretation is that the deep tech market is hotter, more strategic, and more global than it was a year ago, but also more power-law. Category leaders can raise extraordinary amounts of capital; the median company still faces a selective market.
Is more or less capital going into the deep tech market?
More capital is going into the deep tech market right now, even though the clean full-year comparison between 2025 and 2024 looked weaker. Full-year capital fell from about $6.75B in 2024 to about $5.0B in 2025, but year-to-date 2026 has already reached about $9.59B.
That means the deep tech market went through a reset in 2025, then reaccelerated hard in the first half of 2026. The 2025 decline was not a collapse in activity, because deal count rose from 36 to 49 over the same full-year comparison.
The real 2025 issue was round size. Average deal size fell from about $188M in 2024 to about $102M in 2025, while the median fell from $100M to $55M, which suggests more companies were raising but fewer were attracting giant checks.
The 2026 signal is different. Year-to-date 2026 capital is already above both prior full-year totals, but Isomorphic Labs alone accounts for 21.9% of the total and the top 10 deals account for 68.7%.
The practical takeaway is that capital is clearly returning to the deep tech market, but not equally. Investors are writing large checks where they see infrastructure-level bottlenecks in AI drug design, AI chips, robotics, fusion, space mobility, and quantum systems.
Is deep tech funding driven by more deals or larger rounds?
Deep tech funding is being driven by both more deals and larger headline rounds in 2026, but the larger change is capital intensity at the top. Year-to-date 2026 has 64 deals versus 21 deals over the comparable 2025 period, while capital rose from about $2.33B to about $9.59B.
Because dollars grew faster than deal count, larger rounds are doing more than activity alone. The deep tech market is not just producing more companies; it is producing more very large financings for the companies investors believe can define whole categories.
The 2025 full-year comparison tells the opposite story. Deals rose from 36 to 49, but total capital fell from $6.75B to about $5.0B, which means 2025 was driven by broader deal formation and smaller rounds.
The 2026 year-to-date comparison flips the story again. Average round size rose from about $111M in the comparable 2025 period to about $150M in 2026, while the median fell from $85M to $50M.
That divergence is the real signal. The typical deep tech company is not necessarily raising more easily; the top of the market is simply much hotter than the middle.
Is deep tech capital moving toward later-stage or earlier-stage companies?
Deep tech capital is moving toward earlier stage labels, especially Series A, but not toward small, low-risk early-stage checks. In year-to-date 2026, Series A accounts for 51.6% of deals and 42.5% of capital.
Seed plus Series A accounts for 43.9% of year-to-date 2026 capital, compared with 34.8% in the comparable 2025 period and 38.7% across full-year 2025. On the surface, that makes the deep tech market look earlier-stage.
But the stage label is misleading. Year-to-date 2026 Series A rounds raised about $4.07B, with an average Series A of about $123M and a median Series A of about $54M.
That is not classic startup formation. It is institutional-scale company building at an early technical stage, where investors are funding difficult engineering roadmaps before conventional commercial maturity.
The most accurate interpretation is that the deep tech market is moving earlier for bigger platform ideas. Series A increasingly means “build around a major scientific or industrial bottleneck,” not simply “prove a small startup concept.”
Is the deep tech market maturing or still experimental?
The deep tech market is maturing, but it remains experimental in its technical risk profile. The strongest maturity indicators are the high number of large rounds, the follow-on capital base, and the presence of strategic investors willing to underwrite platform-scale risk.
So far in 2026, 30 deals are above $50M and 18 deals are above $100M. Late-stage rounds from Series B onward still capture 55.6% of capital, which confirms that this is not only a seed-stage science market.
At the same time, the market is not mature in the sense of predictable revenue or standardized underwriting. The median round is $50M, the average is about $150M, and the largest round is 42x the median.
The bottom half of deals account for only 7.0% of capital, which confirms that the deep tech market is a power-law market. A small number of companies are treated as strategic infrastructure assets, while the long tail remains much harder to finance.
The honest interpretation is that the deep tech market is maturing around specific infrastructure categories, not evenly across the whole field. Semiconductors, robotics, fusion, AI-biotech, quantum, and space infrastructure are attracting serious capital; advanced materials and long-tail experimental science remain more difficult.
Are new startups still entering the deep tech market?
Yes, new startups are still entering the deep tech market, but new-company formation is not where most of the capital is going. First financings represent 26.6% of year-to-date 2026 deals, close to 24.5% in full-year 2025 and 25.0% in full-year 2024.
That stability means founder formation has not disappeared. The deep tech market continues to generate new companies across robotics, quantum, semiconductors, biotech platforms, space, and advanced materials.
The capital share tells a more selective story. First financings captured 34.9% of 2024 capital, only 9.2% of 2025 capital, and 12.3% of year-to-date 2026 capital.
The strongest new-startup signals in 2026 are in Robotics Platforms, Quantum Technologies, Semiconductor Technologies, and Biotech Platforms. Robotics has 5 first financings out of 11 deals, while quantum has 3 out of 9 and semiconductors have 3 out of 14.
The practical takeaway is that new entrants are still being funded, but big dollars are reserved for companies with technical validation, strategic relevance, founder pedigree, or a bottleneck thesis. The deep tech market has formation energy, but not blank-check conditions.
Are more investors entering the deep tech market?
Yes, more investors appear to be entering or re-entering the deep tech market, especially in 2026. Full-year 2024 had about 111 unique disclosed investors, full-year 2025 had about 168, and year-to-date 2026 already has about 156.
That is a strong breadth signal. The deep tech investor base is no longer limited to a small set of specialist science funds, even though specialist underwriting still matters.
Repeat activity remains concentrated. In year-to-date 2026, only 11 investors appear more than once, including names such as Bessemer Venture Partners, GV, Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Khosla Ventures, Lightspeed, Intel Capital, and Samsung Ventures.
The investor mix also shows why the category is becoming more strategic. Corporate and strategic investors appear repeatedly in semiconductors, robotics, quantum, space, advanced materials, and fusion, because many deep tech companies sit close to supply-chain, defense, compute, energy, or industrial bottlenecks.
The real signal is not just that more investors are showing up. It is that the investors who can underwrite technical, industrial, and strategic risk are becoming more important to the market’s largest rounds.
Are top investors getting more or less active in deep tech?
Top investors are getting more active in the deep tech market, but their activity is still selective rather than evenly spread. The year-to-date 2026 dataset has roughly 156 disclosed investors, but only 11 appear more than once.
That means the market is broadening at the investor-count level while repeat conviction remains limited. Many funds are willing to make one deep tech bet; far fewer are repeatedly backing the category across multiple companies.
The most repeated 2026 investors include Bessemer Venture Partners, GV, Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Khosla Ventures, Lightspeed, Intel Capital, Samsung Ventures, Initialized Capital, Y Combinator, Sequoia, and Accel. These names cluster around AI infrastructure, biotech, quantum, robotics, semiconductors, and energy.
The practical interpretation is that top investors are active when a company looks like a control point, not when it is merely scientifically interesting. In deep tech, a marquee investor logo should be read as company-specific conviction more than blanket validation of the whole subcategory.
Which deep tech subcategories are gaining momentum?
Semiconductor Technologies, Robotics Platforms, Fusion Technologies, and selected Biotech Platforms are the clearest subcategories gaining momentum in the deep tech market. Together with Fusion, the top four year-to-date 2026 categories by capital represent about 83% of the market.
Semiconductors have the most durable broad momentum. The category ranks first by year-to-date 2026 deal count, with 14 deals, and second by capital, with about $2.19B, which suggests both breadth and depth.
Robotics is also gaining because AI has made physical automation feel more plausible. Apptronik, Mind Robotics, Rhoda AI, Standard Bots, X Square Robot, and other embodied AI companies show that investors are trying to identify the platform layer for physical AI.
Fusion is gaining momentum by capital intensity rather than deal count. Four year-to-date 2026 fusion deals raised about $1.26B, with a median round of about $345M, which means fusion is being funded more like infrastructure than ordinary venture.
Biotech Platforms lead year-to-date 2026 capital, but the signal is more fragile because Isomorphic Labs accounts for $2.1B of the category total. Biotech is gaining at the platform-winner level, but its headline leadership depends heavily on one company.
Which deep tech subcategories are losing momentum?
Space Technologies, Quantum Technologies, and Advanced Materials are not disappearing, but they are losing relative capital momentum inside the deep tech market. Each remains strategically important, but each looks weaker by capital share than the hottest 2026 categories.
Space is active but less capital-dominant. It has 10 year-to-date 2026 deals but only 8.9% of capital, down from 20.0% in full-year 2025.
Quantum remains broad but not capital-dominant. It has 9 year-to-date 2026 deals but only 6.5% of capital, which suggests continued experimentation and infrastructure development without the same mega-round intensity as fusion or semiconductors.
Advanced Materials are strategically important but financially underweighted. The category has only 1.6% of year-to-date 2026 capital, despite relevance to defense, energy, manufacturing, infrastructure, and supply-chain resilience.
The real interpretation is not that these categories are weak in absolute terms. It is that they are being overshadowed by categories with clearer links to AI infrastructure, energy scarcity, robotics deployment, and strategic industrial capacity.
Which regions are gaining momentum in deep tech funding?
Europe is gaining the clearest momentum in deep tech funding by capital quality, while Asia-Pacific is gaining formation visibility. North America remains the largest region, but its dominance has weakened compared with 2024.
North America accounted for 89.4% of 2024 capital, 76.4% of 2025 capital, and 65.0% of year-to-date 2026 capital. That is still the largest share, but the direction is clear: the deep tech market is becoming less North America-only.
Europe has only 12.5% of year-to-date 2026 deals, but 30.0% of capital. That means fewer European companies are raising, but the successful ones are raising very large rounds.
Asia-Pacific is gaining deal visibility rather than capital depth. It has 18.8% of year-to-date 2026 deals but only 3.7% of capital, so it is showing founder formation without comparable large-round density.
The practical takeaway is that Europe is gaining as a scale-up capital region, while Asia-Pacific is gaining as a company-formation region. Those are different kinds of momentum, and they should not be mixed together.
Which regions are losing momentum in deep tech funding?
North America is losing relative share in deep tech funding, even though it is not losing absolute importance. Its year-to-date 2026 capital share is 65.0%, down from 89.4% in 2024.
This does not mean North America is weak. It still has the largest pool of disclosed capital, the most deals, and the deepest concentration of venture, corporate, and strategic buyers.
What has changed is that very large rounds are no longer exclusively clustered in North America. Europe’s 30.0% year-to-date 2026 capital share shows that European deep tech winners can now absorb large institutional rounds.
Latin America and Africa remain absent from the qualifying disclosed dataset. That absence is a capital-depth and visibility signal, suggesting that globally syndicated pure-play deep tech equity financing remains concentrated in regions with dense research institutions, strategic customers, and specialist capital.
The honest interpretation is that North America is still the center of gravity, but the market is less regionally concentrated than it was. The losers are not necessarily existing hubs; the bigger issue is that emerging regions remain mostly outside the disclosed institutional funding map.
Is deep tech becoming more global or regionally concentrated?
The deep tech market is becoming more global, but not globally balanced. North America still leads by capital and deal count, while Europe is increasingly visible in large rounds and Asia-Pacific is increasingly visible in company formation.
The clearest evidence is North America’s capital share falling from 89.4% in 2024 to 65.0% in year-to-date 2026. That is a real move away from extreme concentration.
Europe’s role is different from Asia-Pacific’s role. Europe has fewer deals but much larger capital weight, while Asia-Pacific has more deal visibility but smaller average financing intensity.
The deep tech market therefore has two globalization stories. One is the spread of new companies across more regions. The other is the ability of non-US companies to raise large institutional rounds.
Both stories matter, but the second is harder to achieve. A region is not truly capital-competitive in deep tech until its best companies can raise at the scale required for manufacturing, trials, deployment, infrastructure, or long technical roadmaps.
Is deep tech capital moving toward proven winners or new opportunities?
Deep tech capital is moving toward proven winners by dollars and toward new opportunities by deal count. First financings represent 26.6% of year-to-date 2026 deals, but only 12.3% of capital.
That split means the market is still open to new company formation, but the largest checks are going to companies with existing technical validation, strategic relationships, or unusually strong platform credibility.
Follow-on companies dominate capitalization. This is especially visible in semiconductors, robotics, fusion, quantum, and biotech platforms, where large rounds often require evidence that the company can move beyond invention into scale-up.
The pattern also explains why stage labels can be misleading. A first institutional Series A can be huge when investors believe the company controls a strategic bottleneck, but many first financings remain small relative to the market’s largest follow-ons.
The practical filter is simple: deal count shows where experiments are forming; capital share shows where investors believe category power will accumulate. In 2026, those are not the same thing.
Is the deep tech market becoming winner-takes-most?
Yes, the deep tech market is becoming more winner-takes-most again in 2026. The top 10 deals account for 68.7% of year-to-date capital, up from 58.8% in full-year 2025 and close to 69.4% in 2024.
The top-three concentration is also high. The top three deals account for 35.7% of year-to-date 2026 capital, while the bottom half of deals account for only 7.0%.
That tells us the market is not broad-based in dollar terms. Many companies are raising, but most of the capital is being captured by a small set of perceived platform winners.
This power-law structure is normal for deep tech because the best companies often need very large amounts of money to scale. But it also means headline funding growth can overstate the health of ordinary companies.
The useful rule is to read every deep tech funding total alongside concentration metrics. If top-10 share is high, the market may be booming for leaders while still being difficult for everyone else.
Is the next wave of deep tech winners becoming visible?
Yes, the next wave of deep tech winners is becoming visible, but the clearest candidates are concentrated around bottleneck categories. The strongest 2026 signals are in AI infrastructure, physical-world automation, fusion energy, AI-native biotech, space infrastructure, and quantum systems.
In semiconductors, companies such as MatX, Ricursive Intelligence, Neurophos, and other AI hardware or chip-design platforms point to a market trying to solve compute, inference, power, and design bottlenecks.
In robotics, Apptronik, Mind Robotics, Rhoda AI, Standard Bots, X Square Robot, and other embodied AI companies show that investors are looking for the platform layer of physical automation.
In fusion, the large 2026 rounds suggest investors are increasingly willing to fund energy infrastructure risk when it connects to rising demand from AI, industrial electrification, and strategic power needs.
The next wave is not simply “new science.” It is science attached to a strategic choke point, where the company can plausibly control scarce compute, energy, autonomy, discovery capacity, orbital infrastructure, or industrial supply chains.
Is the deep tech funding landscape fragmenting or consolidating?
The deep tech funding landscape is fragmenting at the entrance and consolidating at the top. Year-to-date 2026 includes 64 deals across 63 unique companies, which shows broad startup and category activity.
At the same time, the top 10 deals account for 68.7% of capital, and the bottom half of deals account for only 7.0%. That is a clear sign that capitalization is consolidating around a limited group of perceived leaders.
Category activity is broad. In 2026, semiconductors, biotech, robotics, fusion, space, quantum, and advanced materials all have qualifying activity.
But capital is not equally broad. Biotech, semiconductors, robotics, and fusion together account for about 83% of year-to-date 2026 dollars, which means the market’s largest checks are concentrated in a narrower set of strategic bottleneck categories.
The best description is “broad at the entrance, narrow at the top.” Many deep tech companies can get funded; far fewer can raise the huge rounds needed to scale.
Where is investor attention shifting in deep tech?
Investor attention in the deep tech market is shifting toward AI infrastructure, physical-world automation, energy bottlenecks, and strategic industrial capacity. The year-to-date 2026 capital mix makes that clear.
Biotech Platforms account for 25.9% of year-to-date 2026 capital, Semiconductor Technologies for 22.9%, Robotics Platforms for 21.1%, and Fusion Technologies for 13.1%. Together, these four categories represent about 83% of capital.
The shift is not simply toward AI as software. It is toward hard infrastructure that AI makes more valuable or more urgent: chips, power, robotics, biological design, orbital infrastructure, and strategic manufacturing capacity.
Space and quantum still matter, but they are playing more specialized roles. Space has strong deal count but lower capital share, while quantum has active formation without the same mega-round intensity as fusion or semiconductors.
The strongest conclusion is that investor attention is moving from pure scientific novelty to bottleneck control. The deep tech market is rewarding companies that can plausibly unlock scarce compute, energy, autonomy, discovery capacity, orbital infrastructure, or strategic supply chains.
Overall, what is the strongest interpretation of the deep tech market?
The strongest interpretation of the deep tech market is that it has moved from a 2025 broadening phase into a 2026 mega-platform financing phase. In 2025, the market had more deals but less capital; in 2026, both capital and activity have accelerated.
This is a real recovery, but not an evenly distributed one. Stage labels are distorted, because a Series A can be $100M, $300M, or more, and the average round is pulled upward by a small number of very large financings.
The deep tech market is also no longer just a collection of science projects. The largest financings are tied to infrastructure bottlenecks in AI drug design, AI semiconductors, humanoid and industrial robotics, fusion energy, in-space transportation, and quantum computing infrastructure.
The final judgment is that the deep tech market is hotter, more strategic, more global, and more winner-takes-most than it was a year ago. That makes it attractive for category leaders and unforgiving for undifferentiated science.
INSIGHTS
The insights below come from reviewing disclosed equity rounds in the deep tech market from January 2024 through July 2026, including the full-year 2024 dataset, the full-year 2025 dataset, and actual year-to-date 2026 activity.
- The headline 2026 funding surge is real, but it is not a broad improvement in ordinary financing conditions. The deep tech market has raised about $9.59B so far in 2026, but the top 10 deals capture 68.7% of that capital. Any reading of market strength should separate the leaders from the median company.
- The 2025 decline was not a collapse in activity. Deals rose from 36 in 2024 to 49 in 2025 while capital fell, which means the market broadened but repriced downward. That made 2025 a bridge year rather than a dead year.
- The 2026 rebound is stronger than the 2025 decline. Year-to-date 2026 capital is already about 4.1x the comparable 2025 period and above both full-year 2024 and full-year 2025 totals. The latest signal is a sharp reacceleration.
- Average round size is a dangerous metric in the deep tech market. In 2026, the average is about $150M while the median is $50M, so the average reflects mega-rounds more than typical fundraising conditions. The median is the better benchmark for ordinary institutional rounds.
- The deep tech market has become a market of strategic bottlenecks. The categories attracting the largest checks are tied to AI compute, drug discovery, energy, autonomy, orbital infrastructure, and industrial capacity. Scientific novelty matters less when it is not attached to a clear bottleneck.
- Stage labels understate risk and overstate maturity. A large Series A in deep tech often funds a difficult engineering roadmap rather than a commercially mature company. Investors are moving earlier by label, but not necessarily taking simpler risk.
- Series A has become the dominant institutional underwriting point. In 2026, Series A represents 51.6% of deals and 42.5% of capital. That makes Series A the central stage for platform formation in the current deep tech cycle.
- The market is not simply moving earlier; it is moving earlier for bigger ideas. Seed rounds remain small by comparison, while Series A rounds can absorb hundreds of millions of dollars. The difference is whether the company is framed as a category-scale infrastructure platform.
- Follow-on companies still dominate capital. First financings are 26.6% of year-to-date 2026 deals but only 12.3% of capital. New-company formation matters for pipeline, while follow-on validation matters for dollars.
- Europe’s 2026 strength is capital quality rather than deal volume. Europe has only 12.5% of year-to-date 2026 deals but 30.0% of capital. Fewer European companies are raising, but the successful ones can raise very large rounds.
- Asia-Pacific is gaining formation visibility but not yet capital depth. The region has 18.8% of year-to-date 2026 deals but only 3.7% of capital. That suggests more startup creation than large-scale financing capacity.
- Semiconductors have the strongest broad momentum. The category ranks first by year-to-date 2026 deal count and second by capital, which is a more durable signal than a category whose leadership depends on one outlier.
- Fusion is being funded like infrastructure, not ordinary venture. Four year-to-date 2026 fusion deals raised about $1.26B, with a median round of about $345M. That shows investors are underwriting energy as a strategic capacity constraint.
- Biotech’s 2026 leadership is real but fragile. Biotech leads capital share, but Isomorphic Labs’ $2.1B round explains most of that lead. Without the outlier, biotech would look less dominant relative to semiconductors and robotics.
- Robotics is becoming a barbell market. Small robotics seed deals coexist with huge platform rounds for humanoid, industrial, and general-purpose robotics companies. That means robotics has both experimentation and winner-selection happening at the same time.
- Space is active but losing relative capital share. Space has 10 year-to-date 2026 deals, but only 8.9% of capital, down from 20.0% in full-year 2025. The category remains active, but it is less central to the current capital surge.
- Quantum remains broad but not capital-dominant. Quantum has 9 year-to-date 2026 deals but only 6.5% of capital. The category still shows experimentation and infrastructure development, but not the same mega-round intensity as fusion or semiconductors.
- Advanced materials remain strategically important but financially underweighted. The category has only 1.6% of year-to-date 2026 capital despite clear relevance to energy, defense, infrastructure, and manufacturing. Investors still appear cautious about scale-up and qualification cycles.
- The bottom half of the market is economically small. In 2026, the bottom half of deals captures only 7.0% of capital. Long-tail startup formation does not explain the market’s dollar growth.
- AI is the cross-category accelerant, but not always the product. AI makes semiconductors, robotics, biotech platforms, power systems, and space data infrastructure more valuable because those categories solve AI-created bottlenecks. The investment theme is hard infrastructure made urgent by AI.
- The most practical rule for interpreting the deep tech market is to separate formation signals from capitalization signals. Deal count shows where experiments are happening; mega-round concentration shows where investors believe category power will accumulate. Confusing those two signals leads to the wrong market read.
OUR METHODOLOGY TO BUILD THIS TRACKER
We built this deep tech funding tracker by reviewing publicly disclosed equity rounds raised by pure-play deep tech companies from January 2024 through July 2026. A company counts as pure-play when more than 80% of its activity is dedicated to science-heavy technologies that require major technical breakthroughs before they scale commercially.
We applied four filters to build the dataset. First, we only included equity rounds, so grants, debt, structured financings, public offerings, acquisitions, SPAC transactions, business combinations, government contracts, and LOIs are excluded. Second, we only counted rounds of $300K or more. Third, we only kept pure-play deep tech companies across Advanced Materials, Quantum Technologies, Robotics Platforms, Space Technologies, Biotech Platforms, Semiconductor Technologies, Fusion Technologies, and Industrial Deep Tech. Fourth, every entry had to be confirmed by a direct company announcement, a press release, a tier-1 media report, a specialized industry source, or a relevant regional publication.
We excluded undisclosed-amount rounds because including them would distort dollar-based metrics such as total capital, average round size, median round size, category shares, and concentration ratios. We also excluded broader adjacent companies when deep tech was not the core business, including generic AI software, generic climate or industrial software, broad biotech or medtech companies without a platform-technology core, and businesses whose primary activity did not meet the more-than-80% pure-play threshold.
The final tracker is a public-source dataset, not a paid-database export. It can miss stealth rounds, undisclosed rounds, database-only small financings, and transactions where the public record does not disclose enough information to confirm amount, timing, equity structure, or deep tech purity. All metrics are calculated only from the disclosed qualifying sample.
Related blog posts
- The most heavily funded startups in the deep tech market
- The highest-valued startups in the deep tech market
- What does funding activity look like in the deep tech market?
