What are the most valued startups in the humanoid robotics market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the humanoid robotics market

In our humanoid robotics market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The humanoid robotics market is moving fast, so we update this valuation ranking every month with the latest public data and careful estimates.
This list ranks humanoid robotics startups by current valuation, using announced round values, public market caps, acquisition values, and structured estimates where direct data is not available.
The result is a practical view of where investor value is concentrating across workplace robots, home humanoids, service robots, dexterous hands, robot bodies, and embodied AI platforms.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the humanoid robotics market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable humanoid robotics startup | Figure AI, $39.0B |
| Second most valuable humanoid robotics startup | 1X Technologies, $8.0B–$10.0B |
| Median valuation in the humanoid robotics market | About $185M |
| Share of total humanoid robotics valuation captured by the top 10 | About 68% |
| Top humanoid robotics startup valuation vs. median | About 211x |
| Median humanoid robotics valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | About 5.4x |
| Humanoid robotics startups valued at $1B+ | 26 startups, based on valuation midpoint |

This market map, featured in our humanoid robotics market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the humanoid robotics market
Top startups in the humanoid robotics market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the humanoid robotics market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the humanoid robotics market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Figure AI | Workplace humanoid robots | $39.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.8B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | 1X Technologies | Home humanoid androids | $8.0B–$10.0B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $134M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | UBTECH Robotics | Humanoid and service robots | $7.1B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $1.6B | Partial Confidence |
| 4 | Apptronik | Apollo humanoid worker robots | $5.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.0B | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | NEURA Robotics | Cognitive industrial humanoids | $4.0B–$4.6B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $1.4B | Partial Confidence |
| 6 | Galbot | Embodied AI humanoid robots | $3.0B–$3.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $1.2B | Partial Confidence |
| 7 | Galaxea Dynamics | Embodied AI humanoid robots | $2.9B–$3.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $635M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | Star Chart AI | Embodied AI robotics models | $2.7B–$2.9B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $100M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 9 | X Square Robot | Embodied AI robot brains | $1.8B–$3.5B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $696M | Partial Confidence |
| 10 | AgiBot | Embodied AI humanoid robots | $2.1B–$2.8B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $84M | Low Confidence |
| 11 | Unitree Robotics | Quadruped and humanoid robots | $1.9B–$2.6B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $236M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Agility Robotics | Digit warehouse humanoid robots | $2.0B–$2.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $589M | Partial Confidence |
| 13 | Leju Robot | Industrial humanoid robot maker | $1.7B–$2.6B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Implied | $253M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | Spirit AI | Robot foundation models | $1.8B–$2.4B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $809M | Partial Confidence |
| 15 | The Bot Company | Home chore robots | $1.8B–$2.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $300M | Strong Confidence |
| 16 | RobotEra | General-purpose humanoid robots | $1.5B–$2.3B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $613M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | LimX Dynamics | Modular humanoid robot platforms | $1.3B–$2.5B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $296M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Pudu Robotics | Commercial service humanoid robots | $1.5B–$1.7B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $358M | Strong Confidence |
| 19 | EngineAI | Humanoid and legged robots | $1.4B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $520M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | AI2 Robotics | AlphaBot embodied AI humanoids | $1.4B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $145M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 21 | GigaAI | Physical AGI humanoid platform | $1.4B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $186M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 22 | Keenon Robotics | Service robots and humanoids | $1.0B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $244M | Partial Confidence |
| 23 | PaXini Technology | Tactile sensing for humanoids | $1.1B–$1.7B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $284M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 24 | Noetix Robotics | Affordable consumer humanoid robots | $0.9B–$1.6B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $209M | Partial Confidence |
| 25 | Agile Robots | Intelligent automation and humanoids | $900M–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $250M | Partial Confidence |
| 26 | Fourier Intelligence | Rehab and humanoid robots | $900M–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $200M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | Lumos Robotics | Industrial embodied AI robots | $700M–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $138M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Mentee Robotics | AI humanoid robot platform | $900M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $38M | Partial Confidence |
| 29 | Generative Bionics | Industrial Italian humanoid robots | $540M–$1.0B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $81M | Strong Confidence |
| 30 | WIRobotics | Wearable and humanoid robots | $453M–$850M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $77M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Sharpa | Dexterous humanoid hands | $500M–$800M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Low Confidence |
| 32 | Sanctuary AI | Phoenix general-purpose humanoids | $450M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $110M | Partial Confidence |
| 33 | X-Humanoid | Tiangong humanoid robot platform | $400M–$670M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Full Confidence |
| 34 | RoboForce | Industrial physical AI robots | $350M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $67M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Richtech Robotics | Hospitality and healthcare robots | $481M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $70M | Full Confidence |
| 36 | MagicLab | Humanoid and quadruped robots | $350M–$575M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $89M | Partial Confidence |
| 37 | Lanxin Robotics | 3D-vision humanoid robots | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $59M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | Daimon Robotics | Tactile robotic dexterous hands | $200M–$350M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | VinMotion | Factory humanoid deployments | $180M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $52M | Partial Confidence |
| 40 | SoftBank Robotics | Service humanoid robotics platforms | $100M–$300M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $368M | Partial Confidence |
| 41 | Zerith Robotics | Service humanoid robots | $120M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $30M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | CasiVision | Industrial AI vision systems | $120M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $21M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | Phybot | General-purpose humanoid robots | $110M–$190M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Partial Confidence |
| 44 | Persona AI | Shipyard industrial humanoids | $110M–$180M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $27M | Full Confidence |
| 45 | Booster Robotics | Small humanoid platforms | $80M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Kepler Exploration Robotics | General-purpose industrial humanoids | $70M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | Mimic Robotics | Dexterous robotic hands | $70M–$110M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | PAL Robotics | Research and service humanoids | $60M–$120M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 49 | Cyan Robotics | Companion humanoid robots | $60M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $14M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 50 | Oversonic Robotics | Cognitive humanoids for industry | $60M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | Enchanted Tools | Friendly service robots | $45M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Partial Confidence |
| 52 | Reflex Robotics | Wheeled warehouse humanoids | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Partial Confidence |
| 53 | AEI Robot | Gearless-actuator humanoid robots | $36M–$60M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Prosper Robotics | Domestic robot butlers | $25M–$60M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 55 | Allonic | Robot body manufacturing | $30M–$48M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Full Confidence |
| 56 | Clone Robotics | Biomimetic androids | $25M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | Dexmate | Wheeled industrial humanoids | $15M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 58 | Pollen Robotics | Open-source humanoid platforms | $15M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $3M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Tokyo Robotics | Force-controlled humanoid robots | $15M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 60 | Physical Robotics | Upper-body humanoid robots | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 61 | Macco Robotics | Hospitality humanoid robots | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Low Confidence |
| 62 | Under Control Robotics / Noble Machines | Heavy-duty industrial humanoids | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 63 | Humanoid | Industrial modular humanoids | $10M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 64 | AoBo Root | Commercial service humanoids | $8M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 65 | Tangible Robots | Home dexterity humanoids | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Perceptyne | Semi-humanoid factory robots | $12M–$20M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 67 | Navel Robotics | Social care robots | $10M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | Devanthro | Home-care humanoid robots | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 69 | Westwood Robotics | Humanoid robots and actuators | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 70 | Boardwalk Robotics | Advanced legged humanoids | $5M–$20M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 71 | Muks Robotics | Indian enterprise humanoid robots | $9M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Full Confidence |
| 72 | Roboligent | AI mobile manipulator robots | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 73 | NEXFORM | Modular embodied AI robots | $5M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 74 | ARTROBOT | Humanoid research platforms | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 75 | IntBot | Social humanoid service agents | $4M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 76 | Weave Robotics | Home personal robots | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 77 | TeknTrash | Recycling AI robotics | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 78 | Mirsee Robotics | Manufacturing humanoid robots | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 79 | iHub Robotics | Indian humanoid manufacturing | $3M–$6M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 80 | pi4 Robotics | Industrial robotics engineering services | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 81 | K-Scale Labs | Open-source humanoid hardware | $0M–$1M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |

This chart, featured in our humanoid robotics market deck, compares the 2026 size of the humanoid robotics market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the humanoid robotics market
Insights
- Figure AI alone represents about 34% of total midpoint valuation in this humanoid robotics ranking, which shows how strongly investors reward perceived category leadership.
- The top 10 humanoid robotics startups capture about 68% of total midpoint valuation, so the market is broad, but value creation remains heavily concentrated at the top.
- Figure AI and Apptronik together account for roughly $44B of midpoint valuation, which is close to 38% of the full ranking despite representing only two companies.
- The median humanoid robotics startup in this list is valued at about $185M, while Figure AI is worth about 211 times that median, a striking sign of market polarization.
- Home robotics is becoming a serious valuation theme, with 1X Technologies and The Bot Company both reaching multi-billion-dollar valuation territory despite very different product strategies.
- The humanoid robotics stack is not only about full-body robots, since companies focused on dexterous hands, robot bodies, tactile sensing, wearable robotics, and embodied AI also capture meaningful value.
- Industrial humanoid robotics remains one of the clearest commercial paths, with Apptronik, Agility Robotics, RoboForce, Persona AI, and several China-based players targeting labor-intensive work environments.

This chart, featured in our humanoid robotics market deck, shows how Agility Robotics is capturing share in humanoid robotics
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the humanoid robotics market based on their current valuation.
Estimating startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many humanoid robotics companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed robotics companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a startup is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a humanoid robotics startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, robot deployment traction, customer pipeline, or commercial partnerships, combined with valuation multiples from comparable companies in the same market.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, product maturity, public demonstrations, manufacturing progress, or customer traction.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency, and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the humanoid robotics market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our humanoid robotics market deck, illustrates yearly funding for humanoid robotics startups
Related blog posts
- The latest news in the humanoid robotics market
- The latest funding news in the humanoid robotics market
- What has changed recently in the humanoid robotics market?
- How funding activity has changed in the humanoid robotics market
- What are the key fundraising trends in the humanoid robotics market?
- What is the true size of the humanoid robotics market?
- The full range of business models in the humanoid robotics market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.