Which quantum startup is growing the fastest?

In our quantum computing market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
SUMMARY
QuEra Computing is the fastest-growing private quantum startup overall today.
The biggest funding round is a poor shortcut for this market. Quantum startup investment has been growing far faster than the underlying market and workforce, so capital tells us more about ambition and future build-out than about commercial traction today.
QuEra stands out because several parts of the business are expanding at once. Its comparable workforce grew about 82% year over year in the same Revelio Labs dataset, ahead of Atom Computing, Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum, Quantum Motion and Photonic.
The hiring surge is backed by real deployment. QuEra moved from cloud access through Amazon Braket into on-premises hardware and then into a roughly ¥6.5 billion AIST procurement in Japan, where its Gemini-class system has been installed alongside a major supercomputing environment.
PsiQuantum is growing on a larger industrial scale, but it is still building toward the commercial utility-scale machines that are meant to justify that scale. Its $1 billion financing, Chicago and Australia sites, and Stage C progress with DARPA make it the infrastructure leader rather than the clearest present-day business-growth leader.
Atom Computing is the strongest operating challenger. Its workforce grew roughly 61% in the same comparison, its AC1000 is commercially available for on-premises deployment, and its work with Microsoft gives it a serious route into logical-qubit workloads and enterprise systems.
SpinQ may be growing faster by sales from a much smaller base. Reported order growth above 130% in 2025 and another 80% year over year in early 2026 is hard to ignore, but the public financial trail is still too thin to rank it first with confidence.
Origin Quantum shows the opposite problem: extraordinary financing and industrialization, but not enough visibility into recurring revenue, customer concentration or workforce growth. It may eventually prove to be one of the sector's fastest growers, but the evidence is still lopsided.
Public quantum companies are a useful reality check. Businesses generating roughly $40 million to $50 million of annual revenue already count as substantial pure-play quantum vendors, which is why a single hardware contract worth tens of millions can be more informative than a multibillion-dollar valuation jump.
Technical progress also has to be judged carefully. Physical-qubit counts are not directly comparable across neutral atoms, photonics, superconducting circuits, silicon spins and cat qubits, so independent evaluation, deployed systems and demonstrated error-correction work carry more weight than a clean roadmap slide.
The ranking therefore comes down to convergence. QuEra is not the biggest company, the best-funded company or the clearest sales-growth leader, but it has the strongest combination of rapid hiring, paid deployment, widening distribution, credible technical progress and enough financing to keep scaling.

This market map, featured in our quantum computing market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the quantum computing market
Why is the fastest-growing quantum startup so hard to call right now?
Quantum startups are growing fast today, but funding is outrunning the actual quantum market so dramatically that the biggest financing round tells us very little about who is building the fastest-growing business.
QED-C’s latest State of the Global Quantum Industry report puts the 2025 quantum-technology market at about $1.9 billion, including roughly $1.4 billion for quantum computing. In the same year, private venture investment reached $4.9 billion, up 192%, while the pure-play quantum workforce grew 14% to 16,482 people. Money was coming in more than ten times faster than jobs were being added.
McKinsey measures the funding boom more broadly and gets an even larger number: $12.6 billion invested in quantum-technology startups in 2025, 6.3 times the previous year. Roughly 60% went into the ten biggest deals. The definitions differ, so the two funding totals should not be compared directly. They still point to the same strange setup: investors are pouring money into a small group of companies far faster than customers are buying quantum computing.
A startup can add several billion dollars of valuation while its main machine remains years away. Another can double its staff while generating little recurring revenue. A third can sell actual systems from a much smaller funding base. To find the fastest-growing startup, we need to see what is actually getting bigger inside the business.
Which quantum companies still count as startups today?
Quantinuum, IQM, Xanadu, Infleqtion and Pasqal are public companies now, so we exclude them from the private quantum-startup race.
This cutoff has changed quickly. Infleqtion listed in February, Xanadu in March, Quantinuum in June, IQM in July, and Pasqal joined them more recently after completing its business combination and starting public trading. All five remain useful benchmarks because they disclose revenue, backlog and deliveries that private companies usually keep hidden.
The private field is therefore narrower than it looked a year ago. QuEra, PsiQuantum, Atom Computing, Photonic, Quantum Motion, Alice & Bob, SpinQ and Origin Quantum are among the serious contenders. Smaller companies may be growing even faster from tiny bases, but we cannot make a defensible global comparison when customer, workforce and financing data barely exist.
| Company | Status today | Why it matters here |
|---|---|---|
| QuEra Computing | Private | Fast hiring, installed neutral-atom hardware, large contracts |
| PsiQuantum | Private | Biggest capital and infrastructure build-out |
| Atom Computing | Private | Rapid hiring and commercial 1,200+ qubit systems |
| SpinQ | Private | Very fast disclosed order growth from a smaller base |
| Origin Quantum | Private | Huge recent Chinese financing and valuation jump |
| Photonic | Private | $2B valuation and heavy funding |
| Alice & Bob | Private | Fast team growth and first complete system |
| Quantum Motion | Private | Large Series C and first full-stack silicon system |
| Quantinuum, IQM, Xanadu, Infleqtion, Pasqal | Public | Commercial benchmarks rather than startup contenders |

As this chart shows, and as featured in our quantum computing market deck, search interest in quantum computing has grown significantly
What does “growing fastest” even mean in quantum computing?
For a private quantum startup, “growing fastest” should mean that several parts of the business are getting bigger together: the team, customer deployments, orders or contracts, distribution and technical capability.
Revenue would normally settle the argument. Private quantum companies rarely give us enough of it. Hardware contracts arrive in lumps, government procurement can dominate a year, cloud revenue is seldom broken out, and some companies are building machines that customers cannot use yet.
Headcount becomes useful when we compare the same source over the same period. Contracts become more convincing when a machine is actually installed. Funding shows how aggressively a company can expand research and manufacturing. Technical milestones tell us whether that expansion rests on hardware that is really progressing. We need the combination.
Physical-qubit counts also need care. Neutral atoms, photonics, superconducting circuits, silicon spins and cat qubits have different error profiles and different paths toward logical qubits. Ranking companies from the largest physical-qubit number would give us a very different article and a fairly weak measure of business growth.
So we are looking for the private company where people, customers, deployed hardware and credible technical capacity are expanding together.
Is PsiQuantum actually growing fastest because it raised $1 billion?
PsiQuantum clearly wins the capital-and-infrastructure race right now, although most of the commercial payoff sits inside utility-scale systems that are still under construction.
Its $1 billion Series E valued PsiQuantum at $7 billion and gave the company enough capital to push ahead with utility-scale sites in Chicago and Australia. Chicago broke ground in 2025, while construction started at the Moreton Bay site in June 2026. Few quantum startups are attempting anything remotely similar in physical scale.
DARPA provides an unusually strong outside check. The agency moved PsiQuantum into Stage C of its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative, the final verification stage, alongside Microsoft. In July 2026, PsiQuantum signed an expanded $125 million DARPA agreement covering testing and evaluation. Two months earlier, the US Department of Commerce had signed a letter of intent for up to $100 million of proposed CHIPS incentives.
The organization itself is getting much larger. Revelio Labs’ comparable first-quarter estimates move PsiQuantum from 461 employees in 2025 to 597 in 2026, about 30% growth. That means roughly 136 additional people in a year, twice QuEra’s absolute increase.
PsiQuantum today looks like the biggest industrial build-out among private quantum companies. But that is a slightly different race. Hundreds of people and enormous infrastructure are being assembled ahead of the utility-scale computers that are supposed to generate the eventual payoff. QuEra has a stronger case once we require visible customer deployment today.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest quantum computing market report.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, illustrates yearly VC funding for quantum computing startups
Is QuEra hiring faster than the other quantum startups?
QuEra is currently hiring faster than the major private quantum startups we can compare through one consistent workforce dataset.
Using Revelio Labs’ first-quarter snapshots, QuEra went from 83 employees in 2025 to 151 in 2026. We calculate growth of about 82%. Atom Computing comes next at roughly 61%, Alice & Bob at 41%, PsiQuantum at 30%, Quantum Motion at 20% and Photonic at 10%.
The gap is big. QED-C says the pure-play quantum workforce grew 14% across the industry in 2025. QuEra’s comparable one-year increase was almost six times that pace. QuEra itself said its global workforce doubled during 2025, pointing in the same direction even though its internal count covers a slightly different period.
More than $230 million of financing completed in 2025 gave QuEra room to support that expansion. Investors included Google and SoftBank Vision Fund 2, with NVIDIA’s NVentures later joining the financing.
The latest Revelio release showed 75 active QuEra job postings and said active postings had more than doubled from the previous year. Hiring therefore appears to be continuing rather than fading after the financing round.
Revelio uses workforce intelligence rather than company payroll records, so 151 should be read as an estimate. Using exactly the same source and quarterly endpoints for every company still gives us a useful comparison.
| Private company | Q1 2025 employees | Q1 2026 employees | Our calculated growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| QuEra | 83 | 151 | 82% |
| Atom Computing | 77 | 124 | 61% |
| Alice & Bob | 162 | 229 | 41% |
| PsiQuantum | 461 | 597 | 30% |
| Quantum Motion | 91 | 109 | 20% |
| Photonic | 169 | 186 | 10% |
Is QuEra turning its rapid growth into real quantum-computer deployments?
QuEra’s hiring surge has already turned into shipped hardware and paid procurement, which is the main reason we take the headcount growth seriously.
Japan’s AIST awarded QuEra a ¥6.5 billion contract, worth about $41 million when announced, for a neutral-atom quantum computer to sit alongside the ABCI-Q supercomputer. The official procurement record confirms a price of ¥6,499,999,999. QuEra deployed the Gemini-class system in 2025, and its current materials say the machine became operational in early 2026.
Aquila had already given outside users access to QuEra hardware through Amazon Braket since 2022. Gemini took the company into on-premises gate-based hardware. The AIST project then required QuEra to install that machine beside a major GPU supercomputer and support a hybrid computing environment.
Distribution is expanding too. QuEra’s deeper AWS relationship is supposed to put Libra, its planned fault-tolerant system, on Amazon Braket in 2028. The company also added a partnership with Zapata Quantum in August 2026 around applications and commercial use cases.
One of the freshest operational developments came later that month. QuEra said an Anthropic Claude agent had learned to control a laser subsystem inside one of its machines, recovering the subsystem in seconds where an expert would normally need minutes. We count that as an operations improvement rather than new customer demand. A commercial quantum computer eventually has to stay calibrated without a physicist constantly adjusting every subsystem.
QuEra has now moved through cloud access, an on-premises product and a national-lab deployment tied to a large procurement. That progression makes the rapid hiring much easier to believe.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest quantum computing market report.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, looks at IonQ’s strategy in quantum computing
Is QuEra’s technology actually keeping up with its growth?
QuEra’s technology is keeping pace with the company’s rapid expansion, although PsiQuantum currently has stronger independent validation for the final jump to utility scale.
DARPA moved QuEra into Stage B of the Quantum Benchmarking Initiative, where the agency examines technical risks, prototypes and the full path toward a useful fault-tolerant computer. PsiQuantum is already in Stage C, so QuEra still has another important test ahead.
There is real hardware behind QuEra’s roadmap. Research involving QuEra, Harvard and MIT has demonstrated error-corrected logical operations with neutral atoms, while QuEra reported continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system in 2025. Recent peer-reviewed work has concentrated heavily on reducing fault-tolerance overhead through high-rate error correction and transversal architectures.
The current roadmap is aggressive. Libra is planned with more than 256 logical qubits running on over 10,000 physical qubits, a logical error rate around 10^-6 and roughly one million reliable logical operations. QuEra says a follow-on gigaquop system should exceed 1,000 logical qubits and one billion operations in 2028 or 2029.
Those specifications remain company targets. We give them more weight than a clean-sheet roadmap because QuEra already operates Aquila, has deployed Gemini, has published error-correction results and has survived the first stages of DARPA scrutiny. Libra now has to prove that this sequence can continue at a much larger scale.
Could SpinQ be growing faster than QuEra by actual sales?
SpinQ may have the fastest disclosed order growth among private quantum startups today, but its financial reporting is much thinner and its starting revenue base appears far smaller.
Secondary industry reporting based on Chinese company disclosures puts SpinQ’s 2024 revenue above RMB50 million, roughly $7 million. Orders reportedly grew more than 130% in 2025 and another 80% year over year in the first quarter of 2026. Superconducting products had risen to around 65% of revenue by then.
The repeated order growth is more interesting than one unusually strong quarter. SpinQ also has a commercial base that many Western quantum startups lack: its compact NMR machines have been deployed at more than 200 universities, while the company has gradually pushed into more advanced superconducting systems.
Capital is arriving quickly as well. SpinQ completed a RMB1 billion Series D in June 2026 and said it had raised RMB2 billion over the previous six months. That is aggressive funding for a company whose disclosed sales base still appears to be measured in the low tens of millions of dollars.
The catch is verification. We do not have public-company accounts, and the order numbers circulate through 36Kr and specialist quantum publications rather than audited filings. SpinQ has a serious claim to the fastest disclosed sales momentum. We need better financial disclosure before putting it above QuEra overall.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest quantum computing market report.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, illustrates yearly funding for quantum computing startups
Is Origin Quantum growing faster than the US and European startups?
Origin Quantum is growing at extraordinary speed in financing and domestic industrialization, but there is still too little commercial data to rank the Chinese company first overall.
Origin completed a pre-IPO financing of nearly RMB3 billion in June 2026. Chinese reporting put the pre-money valuation around RMB21 billion, while Dealroom now shows an enterprise value around $3.2 billion. CB Insights had placed Origin below $1 billion in 2025. Because those providers use different methodologies, we treat the apparent tripling as directional rather than a clean like-for-like calculation.
The operating story is becoming more concrete. Shortly before the financing, Origin announced Wukong-180, a superconducting machine built around a domestic 180-computing-qubit chip. Chinese coverage also credits the company with the country’s first quantum-chip production line, an earlier complete superconducting system and quantum-computing programs involving nearly 100 universities.
What we cannot see properly is equally important: recurring revenue, order growth, customer concentration and a reliable workforce series. State-backed investors also play a large role in the recent financing, which makes a direct comparison with Western venture rounds messy.
Origin Quantum could eventually prove to be one of the fastest-growing companies in the entire sector. For now, the evidence establishes a huge financing and industrialization push much more clearly than it establishes the fastest-growing commercial business.
Is Atom Computing the strongest challenger to QuEra?
Atom Computing is currently the closest US challenger to QuEra because its team is growing quickly and customers can already buy its 1,200-plus-qubit system for on-premises deployment.
The same Revelio snapshots put Atom at roughly 61% headcount growth, second only to QuEra in our comparable group. In June 2026, Atom said it had raised more than $300 million in total, including a new $100 million Series C and a planned $100 million from the US Department of Commerce.
Atom’s AC1000 carries more than 1,200 physical neutral-atom qubits and is commercially available as an on-premises system. The platform supports mid-circuit measurement, qubit reuse and real-time conditional branching, giving customers tools needed to build and test logical-qubit workloads.
Microsoft strengthens Atom’s position. The two companies have already demonstrated logical-qubit work together and are developing commercial systems combining Atom hardware with Microsoft’s software stack. DARPA has also advanced Atom into Stage B of the Quantum Benchmarking Initiative.
QuEra currently has more visible customer procurement behind its expansion. Atom has almost everything else we would want to see from a fast-growing challenger. A run of major AC1000 installations could change this ranking quickly.
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest quantum computing market report.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, compares the main business model options for quantum computing hardware startups
Are Alice & Bob, Quantum Motion or Photonic growing fast enough to catch QuEra?
Alice & Bob is moving fastest operationally among these three private quantum startups right now, while Photonic has raised the most capital and Quantum Motion is making the biggest bet on standard silicon manufacturing.
Alice & Bob has become much more tangible this year. The company unveiled Helium in June 2026, its first complete quantum system, after years of focusing primarily on cat-qubit hardware. France’s GENCI then agreed to acquire an 18-cat-qubit machine for installation at the TGCC supercomputing center, with user access expected in 2027. Alice & Bob is also building a $50 million product-development lab in Paris. Combined with the strong workforce growth we saw earlier, the company is moving quickly from component research into complete systems.
Quantum Motion is following a different route. It raised a $160 million Series C in May 2026 after delivering a full-stack silicon CMOS quantum computer to the UK National Quantum Computing Centre in 2025. Its bet is industrial: standard 300mm CMOS processes could eventually let it use much of the semiconductor supply chain that already exists. DARPA has advanced the company to Stage B as well. Its workforce expansion, however, is much slower than QuEra’s or Atom’s.
Photonic has the highest recent valuation of the three. A financing above $200 million closed in May at a $2 billion post-money valuation, taking total capital raised above $350 million. Photonic has since added senior commercial hires, while a Nature Communications paper published in August detailed its SHYPS quantum error-correction approach. Its comparable workforce grew only about 10% over the period we measured.
Alice & Bob therefore looks closest to turning rapid organizational growth into a broader systems business. Photonic’s funding has moved much faster than its headcount, while Quantum Motion is building toward an industrial advantage that has yet to produce similarly fast commercial expansion.
How big is a real quantum-computing business today?
Public quantum companies show that a business producing roughly $40 million to $50 million of annual revenue is already large by pure-play quantum-computing standards these days.
Infleqtion’s corrected second-quarter filing gives us one of the freshest benchmarks. Revenue reached $13.5 million, up 157% year over year, and the company raised its full-year outlook to about $45.1 million.
IQM is guiding to €42 million to €47 million of 2026 revenue. By early August, the company had sold 26 quantum systems, delivered 17 and reported more than €102 million of order backlog. That is one of the clearest pictures we have of what a scaled quantum-hardware vendor looks like commercially.
Pasqal offers another useful comparison because it only became public recently. Its transaction materials show €16.5 million of commercial revenue in 2025, seven QPUs already installed, three more in production and more than €66 million of booked and awarded business including grants.
At the smaller end, Xanadu reported about $1.5 million of second-quarter revenue and $4.3 million for the first half of 2026. Research and development spending alone approached $20 million during the quarter. The gap between scientific ambition and present financial scale remains enormous across much of quantum computing.
These public numbers help us judge the private companies. A hardware order worth tens of millions of dollars is genuinely large in this market. A billion-dollar funding round can be twenty or thirty times the annual revenue of an already commercial quantum company. So yes, money that has already turned into customers, installed machines and repeatable delivery deserves more weight.

This chart, featured in our quantum computing market deck, illustrates how revenue is divided among customer segments in the quantum computing market
Which quantum startup is growing the fastest right now?
QuEra Computing is the fastest-growing private quantum startup overall today.
Several rivals lead individual races. PsiQuantum is building the biggest private quantum infrastructure program and has reached the deepest stage of DARPA validation. SpinQ appears to be growing orders faster from a much smaller base. Origin Quantum has gone through a remarkable financing and industrialization surge. Atom Computing poses the strongest near-term operating challenge.
QuEra stands out because its growth is unusually broad. As seen above, its comparable workforce expanded about 82%, the fastest rate in our same-source group. During the same stretch, the company moved from cloud access into delivered on-premises hardware, expanded its route to users through AWS and kept making progress on the error-correction work behind its fault-tolerant roadmap.
The latest developments are moving in the same direction. QuEra is adding application partners, automating parts of machine operation and building toward a much larger logical-qubit system. We can see expansion in the organization, in deployed hardware, in distribution and in the technology itself.
PsiQuantum would win a ranking based on industrial scale. SpinQ could win a pure sales-growth ranking if fuller financial reporting confirms the order numbers already being reported. But for the broader question of which private quantum startup is growing fastest today, QuEra has the strongest evidence.
| Rank | Private quantum startup | Where it is moving fastest | Our judgment today |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QuEra Computing | Deployments, distribution and fault tolerance | Fastest overall |
| 2 | Atom Computing | Commercial neutral-atom hardware | Closest operating challenger |
| 3 | PsiQuantum | DARPA-validated utility-scale build-out | Biggest industrial scale-up |
| 4 | SpinQ | Chinese hardware commercialization | Possible sales-growth leader |
| 5 | Origin Quantum | Domestic industrialization and new hardware | Extremely fast, too opaque for #1 |
| 6 | Alice & Bob | Complete systems and French procurement | Fast-rising European private player |
| 7 | Photonic | Funding and distributed-quantum R&D | Capital growth ahead of operations |
| 8 | Quantum Motion | Silicon-CMOS industrialization | Strong build-out, slower current expansion |
If you want more recent data on this point, please see our latest quantum computing market report.
OUR METHODOLOGY
We approached the question “Which quantum startup is growing the fastest?” as an evidence-aggregation problem rather than a one-number ranking. The point was to break an unclear question into a few useful dimensions, collect the freshest comparable evidence we could find, and see where several kinds of growth were happening at the same time.
The main dimensions were workforce growth, customer and contract activity, actual system deployment, distribution and commercial reach, financing and infrastructure build-out, and technical progression toward more capable machines. We did not treat any one of these as decisive on its own.
Funding was used mainly as evidence of capacity to expand. In quantum computing that distinction matters a lot because private capital has been growing much faster than the underlying market and workforce. QED-C’s industry data and McKinsey’s broader funding work were the main anchors for that market-level context.
For workforce comparisons, we favored the same external dataset and the same quarterly endpoints wherever possible. Revelio Labs gave us a cleaner relative comparison across QuEra, PsiQuantum, Atom Computing, Alice & Bob, Quantum Motion and Photonic than mixing company-reported headcount figures from different dates.
We gave more weight to deployments, procurement and independently checked technical progress than to future specifications alone. AIST’s procurement record helped verify the scale of QuEra’s Japanese deployment, while DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative gave us a useful outside framework for comparing the maturity of several companies’ paths toward utility-scale systems.
Public quantum companies were excluded from the final startup ranking, but we used their financial disclosures as commercial benchmarks. Infleqtion, IQM, Pasqal and Xanadu are useful here because their revenue, backlog and delivery figures show how large a real pure-play quantum business is today, which in turn helps put private-company contracts and funding rounds into perspective.
The final ranking is a judgment based on convergence rather than a mechanical score. A company could lead one dimension and still rank lower overall if the rest of the business was not expanding at the same pace. That is why PsiQuantum can lead the infrastructure race, SpinQ can lead reported order growth, and QuEra can still come out first overall.
Key sources used for this analysis include: QED-C’s State of the Global Quantum Industry 2026, McKinsey’s Quantum Technology Monitor 2026, DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative, AIST’s QuEra procurement record, Revelio Labs’ QuEra workforce series, Revelio Labs’ PsiQuantum workforce series, QuEra’s financing disclosure, QuEra’s AWS and Libra announcement, PsiQuantum’s $1 billion financing announcement, Atom Computing’s company updates, Alice & Bob’s Helium announcement, Photonic’s financing announcement, Infleqtion’s Q2 2026 filing, and Xanadu’s Q2 2026 results.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, shows how cloud quantum computing access technology has evolved over time
Related blog posts
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living "market pitch" documents for emerging markets: AI, synthetic biology, new proteins, and more. Instead of outdated PDFs or hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what's really happening: key players, deals, regulations, and signals that matter. Learn more about us.