What are the most valued startups in the regenerative agriculture market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the regenerative agriculture market

In our regenerative agriculture market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The regenerative agriculture market includes biological crop inputs, soil carbon platforms, livestock technology, biochar systems, agroforestry financing and farm transition services.
We update this ranking every month to reflect new funding rounds, disclosed valuations, acquisitions and changes in company performance.
Halter currently leads the regenerative agriculture startup ranking, followed by Pivot Bio, Aphea.Bio, Loam Bio and Varaha.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the regenerative agriculture market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable regenerative agriculture startup | Halter, $2.0B |
| Second most valuable regenerative agriculture startup | Pivot Bio, $1.4B–$1.9B |
| Median regenerative agriculture startup valuation | Approximately $59M |
| Share of regenerative agriculture valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 62% |
| Top regenerative agriculture valuation vs. median | Approximately 34 times higher |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 4.8 times |
| Regenerative agriculture startups valued at $1B+ | 2 |

This market map, featured in our regenerative agriculture market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the regenerative agriculture market
Top startups in the regenerative agriculture market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the regenerative agriculture market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the regenerative agriculture market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halter | Virtual fencing for cattle | $2.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $401M | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Pivot Bio | Microbial nitrogen crop inputs | $1.4B–$1.9B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $617M | Full Confidence |
| 3 | Aphea.Bio | Microbial crop biologicals | $450M–$750M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $108M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Loam Bio | Microbial soil carbon products | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $110M | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | Varaha | Farm carbon credit platform | $300M–$500M | Strong Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $58M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Agreena | Carbon farming platform | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $80M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | Nofence | Virtual livestock fencing | $250M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $48M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | NeoFarm | Automated local organic farms | $230M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Regrow | Agricultural carbon accounting platform | $220M–$330M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $59M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | TerViva | Pongamia food, feed and biofuels | $220M–$290M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $94M | Partial Confidence |
| 11 | Kula Bio | Microbial nitrogen biofertilizer | $200M–$260M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $87M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Indigo Ag | Agricultural sustainability programs | $150M–$250M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $1.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | MyLand | Microalgae soil health service | $150M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $46M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | AgriWebb | Livestock management SaaS | $140M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $40M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Andes | Microbial soil carbon removal | $140M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $38M | Strong Confidence |
| 16 | AgroSpheres | Bio-agriculture input delivery | $130M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Low Confidence |
| 17 | Applied Carbon | Mobile biochar production | $110M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Klim | Regenerative farming transition platform | $110M–$180M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Strong Confidence |
| 19 | Groundwork BioAg | Mycorrhizal crop inoculants | $100M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $29M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Two Brothers Organic Farms | Regenerative organic food brand | $105M–$175M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $25M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | Agrion Agrisolutions | Organomineral fertilizer production | $90M–$180M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Low Confidence |
| 22 | CoverCress | Low-carbon oilseed cover crop | $90M–$170M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $46M | Partial Confidence |
| 23 | Carbo Culture | Biochar carbon removal technology | $90M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $25M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | NetZero | Tropical biochar carbon removal | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $39M | Full Confidence |
| 25 | Grow Indigo | Indian carbon farming programs | $80M–$130M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $24M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Regen Organics | Waste-to-regenerative inputs | $70M–$130M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $26M | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | UNDO | Enhanced rock weathering removals | $75M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Perennial | Soil carbon MRV platform | $70M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $24M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Mati Carbon | Enhanced weathering for smallholders | $60M–$100M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 30 | eAgronom | Carbon farming management platform | $55M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $26M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Wildfarmed | Regenerative flour supply chain | $55M–$90M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $16M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Yard Stick | Soil carbon measurement hardware | $55M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $18M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | Agrology | Soil climate analytics | $45M–$90M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 34 | Alt Carbon | Enhanced rock weathering CDR | $50M–$85M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Full Confidence |
| 35 | HabiTerre | Agricultural sustainability measurement platform | $50M–$85M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 36 | Farmland LP | Regenerative farmland investment manager | $40M–$80M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 37 | InSoil | Regenerative agriculture financing | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | Toopi Organics | Urine-derived agricultural biostimulants | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $19M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | Propagate | Agroforestry development and financing | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Full Confidence |
| 40 | NetZeroNitrogen | Microbial nitrogen fertilizer | $38M–$55M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Full Confidence |
| 41 | FA Bio | Microbial agricultural bioproduct discovery | $30M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | Vence | Virtual livestock fencing systems | $30M–$55M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $15M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Qualterra | Biochar and plant propagation | $32M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 44 | AgroCares | Soil nutrient scanning | $25M–$50M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 45 | Athian | Livestock carbon inset marketplace | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Agrobiomics | Crop-stress biomolecules | $20M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | Eion | Enhanced weathering carbon removal | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $15M | Partial Confidence |
| 48 | HeavyFinance | Sustainable agriculture financing marketplace | $20M–$35M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 49 | Agersens | Virtual fencing livestock tech | $25M–$30M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $15M | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | InPlanet | Tropical enhanced rock weathering | $15M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | Regenified | Regenerative agriculture certification | $16M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 52 | Boomitra | Soil carbon credit marketplace | $15M–$25M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 53 | Regen Network | Ecological credit blockchain infrastructure | $12M–$22M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 54 | Mad Agriculture | Regenerative farming finance nonprofit | $10M–$22M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 55 | Jejakin | Enterprise carbon management platform | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Full Confidence |
| 56 | Evologic Technologies | Microbial biologicals manufacturing platform | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | AgriCapture | Carbon farming platform | $8M–$18M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Low Confidence |
| 58 | MyEasyFarm | Regenerative farm management software | $10M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 59 | AdvancedAg | Biological crop inputs | $8M–$16M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Low Confidence |
| 60 | Zymofix | Microbial fermentation for agriculture | $9M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 61 | Seqana | Soil carbon MRV software | $9M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 62 | CroBio | Drought-resilient soil microbes | $8M–$13M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 63 | Silicate | Enhanced weathering soil treatment | $8M–$12M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 64 | Elaniti | AI soil microbiome intelligence | $7M–$11M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 65 | FarmLab / GXLab | Soil measurement data platform | $6M–$12M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Good Agriculture | AI administration for farmers | $6M–$10M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | PastureMap | Grazing management software | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | HyveGeo | Biochar-based desert soil regeneration | $4M–$9M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 69 | reNature | Regenerative transition implementation | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | Livestock Water Recycling | Livestock wastewater recycling systems | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Partial Confidence |
| 71 | Nitrolytics | AI regenerative farming technology | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 72 | Natupla | Biodegradable starch packaging | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 73 | ReGenX | Regenerative ingredient sourcing platform | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 74 | Poás Bioenergy | Biochar biomass gasification systems | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 75 | Nori | Soil carbon removal marketplace | $0M–$1M | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | OpenTEAM | Open-source agricultural technology ecosystem | $0M–$1M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |

This chart, featured in our regenerative agriculture market deck, compares the 2026 size of the regenerative agriculture market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the regenerative agriculture market
Insights
- Halter’s $2.0B valuation is about 34 times the median valuation in this regenerative agriculture ranking, showing how strongly value is concentrated around the market leader.
- The top 10 regenerative agriculture startups represent about 62% of the combined midpoint valuation, even though the ranking includes 76 companies across several different business models.
- Halter and Pivot Bio are the only regenerative agriculture startups valued above $1B, and the two companies together represent roughly one-third of the market’s total estimated valuation.
- Indigo Ag has raised about $1.4B but carries an estimated midpoint valuation of only $200M, creating the clearest funding-to-value dislocation in the regenerative agriculture dataset.
- NeoFarm’s estimated valuation midpoint is more than nine times its cumulative funding, highlighting strong investor demand for automated and locally deployed regenerative farming infrastructure.
- Varaha, Grow Indigo and Two Brothers Organic Farms have a combined midpoint valuation of approximately $645M from only $107M in funding, a strong signal for India’s regenerative agriculture ecosystem.
- Microbial nitrogen companies show a wide maturity gap, with NetZeroNitrogen near a $47M midpoint and Pivot Bio near $1.65B, reflecting the premium attached to commercial scale.
- Carbon-market exposure alone does not determine valuation. Varaha’s $400M midpoint is almost four times Grow Indigo’s $105M midpoint, despite both companies operating agricultural carbon programs.

This chart, featured in our regenerative agriculture market deck, shows why Agreena is winning in regenerative agriculture
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the regenerative agriculture market based on their current valuation.
Estimating regenerative agriculture startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a regenerative agriculture company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a regenerative agriculture startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, acres managed, customer traction or verified carbon removal volumes, combined with valuation multiples from comparable companies in the same market.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, commercial partnerships, farm adoption or product traction.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each regenerative agriculture startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the regenerative agriculture market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our regenerative agriculture market deck, illustrates yearly funding for regenerative agriculture startups
Related blog posts
- What is the latest news in regenerative agriculture?
- What are the latest funding developments in regenerative agriculture?
- The latest developments in regenerative agriculture
- The evolution of funding activity in regenerative agriculture
- The main fundraising trends in regenerative agriculture
- How large is the regenerative agriculture market today?
- The full range of business models in regenerative agriculture
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.