What are the most valued startups in the embedded finance market?

In our updated market reports, you will find everything you need
The embedded finance market brings payments, lending, banking, insurance and financial tools directly into non-financial products and digital platforms.
This ranking tracks 89 embedded finance companies, from global payment leaders to specialized infrastructure providers serving regional and vertical markets.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, public market movements, acquisitions and changes in company performance.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable embedded finance startup | Stripe, $159.0B |
| Second most valuable embedded finance company | Adyen, $29.9B |
| Median embedded finance valuation | Approximately $750M |
| Share of embedded finance valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 79.7% |
| Top embedded finance valuation vs. median | Approximately 212 times |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 3.8 times |
| Embedded finance companies valued at $1B+ | 36 |
Top startups in the embedded finance market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the embedded finance market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stripe | Internet payments infrastructure | $159.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $8.7B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Adyen | Enterprise payment platform | $29.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $1.4B | Partial Confidence |
| 3 | Affirm | Consumer installment financing | $28.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $2.5B | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Afterpay | Buy now pay later | $13.9B | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $394M | Partial Confidence |
| 5 | SumUp | SMB card payments | $10.0B–$15.0B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $689M | Partial Confidence |
| 6 | Checkout.com | Global payment processing | $12.0B | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Observed | $1.8B | Full Confidence |
| 7 | Airwallex | Cross-border business finance | $12.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.8B | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Klarna | Buy now pay later | $7.4B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $4.7B | Partial Confidence |
| 9 | Mollie | European payment services provider | $6.5B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $940M | Full Confidence |
| 10 | Sezzle | Buy now pay later platform | $6.2B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $47M | Partial Confidence |
| 11 | Razorpay | Indian payments and banking | $5.0B–$6.0B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $742M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | Rapyd | Fintech-as-a-service payments | $4.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.3B | Partial Confidence |
| 13 | dLocal | Emerging-market payment processing | $4.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $443M | Full Confidence |
| 14 | Tabby | MENA shopping and BNPL platform | $3.0B–$3.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $552M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Trustly | Account-to-account payment network | $2.5B–$4.0B | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | Flutterwave | African payment infrastructure platform | $3.2B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $489M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | Zip | Buy now pay later payments | $2.8B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $438M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Payoneer | Cross-border business payment platform | $2.5B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $569M | Partial Confidence |
| 19 | bolttech | Embedded insurance exchange platform | $2.0B–$2.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $523M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Banking Circle | Cross-border banking infrastructure | $1.8B–$2.4B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 21 | Zilch | Ad-supported consumer payments network | $1.9B–$2.3B | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $390M | Partial Confidence |
| 22 | GoCardless | Bank debit payment network | $1.8B–$2.3B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $540M | Full Confidence |
| 23 | Pine Labs | Merchant payments commerce platform | $1.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $1.4B | Partial Confidence |
| 24 | Marqeta | API-based card issuing infrastructure | $1.6B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $525M | Full Confidence |
| 25 | Paymentology | Global card issuer processing | $1.2B–$2.0B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $175M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Modern Treasury | Payment operations and ledger APIs | $1.3B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $183M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Nium | Cross-border payments infrastructure | $1.3B–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $312M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Extend | Merchant product protection APIs | $1.0B–$1.6B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $316M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Galileo Financial Technologies | Banking and payments APIs | $1.2B | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $85M | Partial Confidence |
| 30 | Thredd | Global card issuer processing | $1.0B–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $400M | Partial Confidence |
| 31 | OpenPayd | Payments and banking API platform | $1.1B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Observed | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Dock | LatAm payments infrastructure | $900M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $280M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | C2FO | Working-capital marketplace for suppliers | $900M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $430M | Partial Confidence |
| 34 | Pismo | Cloud core banking platform | $1.0B | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $109M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Tamara | GCC shopping and BNPL platform | $900M–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $556M | Partial Confidence |
| 36 | Scalapay | European installment checkout platform | $900M–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $416M | Strong Confidence |
| 37 | Currencycloud | Cross-border payment and FX APIs | $963M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $142M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | ClearBank | Clearing and embedded banking platform | $800M–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $366M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | Fundbox | Automated credit for small businesses | $750M–$1.1B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $404M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | MANGOPAY | Marketplace wallet payment infrastructure | $600M–$1.1B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $82M | Partial Confidence |
| 41 | Increase | Enterprise banking infrastructure APIs | $700M–$1.0B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 42 | Highnote | Unified issuing and acquiring platform | $750M–$900M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $179M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Payrix | Embedded payments for software platforms | $800M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $72M | Full Confidence |
| 44 | Alma | French installment payment platform | $650M–$900M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $205M | Strong Confidence |
| 45 | Modulr | Embedded payments infrastructure | $600M–$900M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $174M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Cover Genius | Embedded protection distribution platform | $650M–$850M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $245M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | Lithic | Developer-focused card issuing APIs | $550M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $115M | Full Confidence |
| 48 | Column | Developer-focused regulated bank | $500M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 49 | i2c | Card issuing and banking software | $500M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 50 | Unit | Banking-as-a-service API platform | $450M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $170M | Full Confidence |
| 51 | Finix | Full-stack payment processing infrastructure | $450M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $171M | Partial Confidence |
| 52 | Sure | Embedded insurance infrastructure platform | $450M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $123M | Strong Confidence |
| 53 | Stitch | African enterprise payments infrastructure | $400M–$600M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $107M | Full Confidence |
| 54 | Pomelo | LatAm card and payment infrastructure | $370M–$550M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $157M | Full Confidence |
| 55 | Balance | B2B checkout and trade credit | $280M–$420M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $87M | Full Confidence |
| 56 | Swan | European embedded banking platform | $290M–$370M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $108M | Full Confidence |
| 57 | Treezor | European banking-as-a-service platform | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 58 | Payabli | Payments infrastructure for software companies | $305M | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $60M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Qover | Insurance orchestration platform | $220M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $72M | Strong Confidence |
| 60 | Treasury Prime | Embedded banking software platform | $210M–$290M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $72M | Full Confidence |
| 61 | Slope | AI-powered B2B payments platform | $180M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $77M | Strong Confidence |
| 62 | Paystack | African online payment processor | $200M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 63 | NymCard | MENA embedded finance infrastructure | $175M–$215M | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $68M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | Griffin | UK licensed embedded-finance bank | $160M–$220M | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $52M | Strong Confidence |
| 65 | Tint | Embedded insurance for platforms | $150M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Mondu | B2B buy-now-pay-later payments | $150M–$210M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $70M | Full Confidence |
| 67 | Resolve | B2B net-terms payment platform | $130M–$210M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $85M | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | Enfuce | European card issuing infrastructure | $125M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $74M | Partial Confidence |
| 69 | Boost Insurance | MGA insurance infrastructure platform | $110M–$180M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $37M | Strong Confidence |
| 70 | Defacto | API-first business lending | $115M–$155M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $49M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | PayMongo | Philippine online payments platform | $90M–$140M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $46M | Full Confidence |
| 72 | Synctera | Banking-as-a-service orchestration platform | $90M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $94M | Full Confidence |
| 73 | Solaris | Licensed European embedded banking | $90M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $695M | Strong Confidence |
| 74 | Gynger | Financing for business technology purchases | $80M–$110M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $32M | Full Confidence |
| 75 | Hokodo | Digital B2B trade credit | $65M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $66M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | Wallester | Corporate cards and issuing services | $60M–$100M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 77 | Banxware | Embedded lending for digital platforms | $55M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $29M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | Railsr | Embedded banking and payments platform | $40M–$80M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $144M | Partial Confidence |
| 79 | Kriya | Embedded SME working-capital finance | $40M–$75M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $65M | Partial Confidence |
| 80 | Treyd | Inventory and supplier invoice financing | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Strong Confidence |
| 81 | Infinant | Coreless embedded banking platform | $45M–$65M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $20M | Full Confidence |
| 82 | Lendflow | Embedded business-lending infrastructure | $45M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $13M | Partial Confidence |
| 83 | Bond | Embedded finance infrastructure platform | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $42M | Full Confidence |
| 84 | Mulberri | Embedded SME insurance platform | $25M–$40M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $11M | Strong Confidence |
| 85 | ConnectPay | Payments for online businesses | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 86 | Jaris | Embedded lending for payment providers | $15M–$25M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $31M | Low Confidence |
| 87 | Sivo | Debt infrastructure for digital lenders | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 88 | Solid | Embedded fintech infrastructure platform | $0M–$5M | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $81M | Full Confidence |
| 89 | Synapse | Banking-as-a-service API middleware | $0M–$2M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $51M | Strong Confidence |
Key valuation trends in the embedded finance market
Insights
- The top 10 companies represent about 79.7% of the dataset's combined valuation, showing that embedded finance value remains heavily concentrated among global payments and consumer-credit platforms.
- Stripe is valued at roughly 212 times the dataset's median company, which highlights the exceptional gap between the market leader and the typical embedded finance provider.
- Airwallex and Checkout.com are each valued near $12 billion after raising about $1.8 billion, compared with Stripe's $159 billion valuation on $8.7 billion of funding.
- Paystack's $200 million acquisition after only $12 million of funding produced a valuation-to-funding multiple of nearly 17 times, one of the strongest realized outcomes in the dataset.
- Payrix, Currencycloud, Pismo and Paystack generated nearly $3 billion in combined acquisition value after raising approximately $335 million, showing strong demand for specialized financial infrastructure.
- bolttech's valuation of roughly $2.1 billion shows that embedded insurance can produce large platforms, although payment processing and card infrastructure still dominate the highest valuations.
- Flutterwave and Paystack illustrate two capital-efficient African payment outcomes, with Flutterwave remaining independent near $3.2 billion and Paystack achieving a strategic $200 million exit.
- Solid and Synapse raised about $132 million combined before their values fell close to zero, showing how compliance, reconciliation and sponsor-bank failures can destroy embedded finance value.
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the embedded finance market based on their current valuation.
Estimating embedded finance startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When an embedded finance company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, payment volume or customer traction, combined with valuation multiples from comparable embedded finance companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, geographic expansion or product adoption.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each embedded finance startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.
Related blog posts
- How are funding trends changing in the embedded finance market?
- Who has raised the most money in the embedded finance market?
- How active is venture funding in the embedded finance market right now?
- An overview of funding deals in the embedded finance market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.