What are the most valued startups in the LDES market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the LDES market

In our LDES market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The LDES market is becoming one of the most important parts of the energy transition, because power grids need storage that can discharge for 10 hours or more.
This ranking tracks the most valuable LDES startups, from iron-air batteries and flow batteries to compressed-air storage, thermal storage, gravity storage, and pumped-hydro systems.
We update this list every month, so founders, investors, operators, and analysts can follow how valuations change in this fast-moving market.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the LDES market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable LDES startup | Eos Energy Enterprises, at $3.6B |
| Second most valuable LDES startup | Form Energy, at $3.1B–$4.0B |
| Median LDES startup valuation | About $35M |
| Share of total LDES valuation captured by the top 10 | About 80% |
| Top LDES startup valuation vs. median | About 103x higher |
| Median LDES valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | About 3.7x |
| LDES startups valued at $1B+ | 8 startups |

This market map, featured in our LDES market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the LDES market
Top startups in the LDES market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the LDES market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the LDES market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eos Energy Enterprises | Zinc battery storage | $3.6B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $316M | Partial Confidence |
| 2 | Form Energy | Iron-air grid batteries | $3.1B–$4.0B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1.2B | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | EnerVenue | Metal-hydrogen grid batteries | $2.0B–$3.8B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $445M | Partial Confidence |
| 4 | Hydrostor | Compressed-air storage | $1.3B–$2.3B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $250M | Low Confidence |
| 5 | Antora Energy | Thermal batteries for industry | $1.0B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $309M | Partial Confidence |
| 6 | Rongke Power | Vanadium flow battery systems | $1.0B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $145M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | CMBlu Energy | Organic solid-flow batteries | $1.2B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $165M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Highview Power | Liquid-air energy storage | $800M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $450M | Partial Confidence |
| 9 | Sage Geosystems | Geothermal pressure storage | $650M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $146M | Partial Confidence |
| 10 | Energy Vault | Gravity storage systems | $889M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $752M | Partial Confidence |
| 11 | Energy Dome | CO2 battery storage | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $84M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | Malta | Thermal energy storage | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $122M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | Invinity Energy Systems | Vanadium flow batteries | $250M–$300M | Strong Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $170M | Partial Confidence |
| 14 | RedoxBlox / Tempo | Thermochemical industrial heat storage | $200M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $41M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Rye Development | Pumped-hydro storage developer | $150M–$300M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 16 | e-Zinc | Zinc-air long-duration batteries | $180M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $60M | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | TerraFlow Energy | Vanadium flow battery systems | $130M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | ESI Asia Pacific | Iron-flow battery manufacturing | $150M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $23M | Partial Confidence |
| 19 | H2, Inc. | Vanadium flow batteries | $110M–$200M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | Noon Energy | Carbon-oxygen long-duration battery | $110M–$190M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $31M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | VRB Energy | Vanadium flow battery systems | $120M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $169M | Strong Confidence |
| 22 | VFlowTech | Vanadium flow battery systems | $110M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Full Confidence |
| 23 | Fourth Power | Thermal grid energy storage | $100M–$170M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Photoncycle | Seasonal hydrogen storage | $85M–$140M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $22M | Full Confidence |
| 25 | MGA Thermal | Industrial thermal storage blocks | $80M–$150M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $21M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Quidnet Energy | Underground pumped storage | $70M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 27 | Offgrid Energy Labs | ZincGel stationary batteries | $75M–$125M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | Time Energy Storage | Organic aqueous flow batteries | $70M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Wontai Power | Vanadium flow battery systems | $60M–$140M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 30 | Echogen Power Systems | sCO2 pumped thermal storage | $70M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $59M | Low Confidence |
| 31 | Allegro Energy | Water-based flow batteries | $75M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 32 | Magaldi Green Energy | Sand thermal energy storage | $50M–$120M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 33 | Quino Energy | Organic quinone flow batteries | $55M–$90M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Strong Confidence |
| 34 | Luquos Energy | Sulfur-based flow batteries | $52M–$87M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $13M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Ore Energy | Iron-air grid batteries | $45M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $11M | Full Confidence |
| 36 | Primus Power | Zinc-bromine flow batteries | $40M–$80M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $92M | Partial Confidence |
| 37 | XL Batteries | Organic flow batteries | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | StorEn Technologies | Residential vanadium flow batteries | $55M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Observed | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | Zhonghe Energy Storage / ZH Energy | Flow battery materials systems | $40M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 40 | Sinergy Flow | Sulfur flow batteries | $30M–$55M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Full Confidence |
| 41 | CellCube | Vanadium flow batteries | $35M–$70M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 42 | Qnetic | Long-duration flywheel storage | $45M–$50M | Strong Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Observed | $9M | Partial Confidence |
| 43 | Sizable Energy | Offshore pumped-hydro storage | $35M–$60M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $9M | Strong Confidence |
| 44 | Redox One | Iron-chromium flow batteries | $20M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 45 | APEX CAES | Compressed-air storage plants | $20M–$50M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | N/A | Low Confidence |
| 46 | Elestor | Hydrogen flow battery storage | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $31M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | 1414 Degrees | Silicon thermal energy storage | $33M–$36M | Strong Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $19M | Partial Confidence |
| 48 | Green Gravity | Mine-shaft gravity storage | $30M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Strong Confidence |
| 49 | PolyFlow Energy | Vanadium flow batteries | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 50 | KEMIWATT | Organic flow batteries | $22M–$32M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | Jena Flow Batteries | Organic flow battery systems | $15M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 52 | Mobius Energy Storage | Iron slurry flow batteries | $16M–$27M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Low Confidence |
| 53 | Jolt Energy Storage Technologies | Organic redox flow batteries | $20M–$32M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 54 | BaroMar | Underwater compressed-air storage | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | N/A | Low Confidence |
| 55 | Gravity Power | Underground pumped-hydro storage | $22M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Observed | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | VSUN Energy | Vanadium battery deployments | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 57 | ESS Tech | Iron flow batteries | $25M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $511M | Partial Confidence |
| 58 | Cheesecake Energy | Compressed-air thermal storage | $18M–$30M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Ecolyte | Organic electrolyte flow batteries | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 60 | STOLECT | Carnot battery storage | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Low Confidence |
| 61 | Flux XII | Aqueous flow battery materials | $16M–$26M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Full Confidence |
| 62 | H2-Enterprises | Hydrogen production and storage | $10M–$35M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 63 | HalioGen Power | Membraneless redox flow batteries | $12M–$22M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 64 | i-battery | Vanadium redox flow batteries | $10M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 65 | Volterion | Flow-battery stacks | $10M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Build to Zero | Industrial thermal storage | $10M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | Advanced Rail Energy Storage | Rail-based gravity storage | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 68 | Halide Energy | Copper flow batteries | $8M–$18M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Partial Confidence |
| 69 | RheEnergise | High-density pumped hydro | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | Otoro Energy | Metal-chelate flow batteries | $8M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 71 | Vanaflow Energy Systems | Vanadium flow batteries | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 72 | R.Flo | Iron flow batteries | $7M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 73 | VisBlue | Commercial flow battery systems | $8M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 74 | Gravity Storage | Hydraulic gravity storage | $5M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 75 | Bryte Batteries | Nordic flow battery integrator | $5M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | TerraStor | Advanced compressed-air storage | $5M–$9M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 77 | NETenergy | Building thermal battery storage | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 78 | AED Energy | Thermal batteries for power | $5M–$12M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 79 | Corre Energy | Underground CAES project developer | $7M–$8M | Strong Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $58M | Strong Confidence |
| 80 | BioZen Batteries | Organic flow-battery electrolytes | $2M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 81 | Rivus Batteries | Organic flow battery electrolytes | $4M–$9M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 82 | GridFlow.tech | Lithium-sulfur flow batteries | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 83 | VoltStorage | Iron-salt storage technology | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $31M | Partial Confidence |
| 84 | Breeze | Pipeline compressed-air storage | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 85 | Pinflow Energy Storage | Flow-battery components and systems | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 86 | CarbeniumTec | Metal-free flow batteries | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Partial Confidence |
| 87 | Proxhima | Vanadium flow battery systems | $3M–$6M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 88 | Carbo Energy | Waste-derived flow batteries | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Partial Confidence |
| 89 | Tectonic Power | Redox flow batteries | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 90 | Brenmiller Energy | Industrial thermal storage | $3M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 91 | Upthermo | Waste heat recovery systems | $1M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Strong Confidence |
| 92 | Zion Technologies | Vanadium battery deployment | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0 | Low Confidence |
| 93 | Tharam-Thiran Green Energy Flow | Sulfur-iron flow batteries | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Strong Confidence |
| 94 | ARKLE Energy Solutions | Vanadium flow batteries | $2M–$3M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $0M | Strong Confidence |
| 95 | Gravitricity | Underground weight-based storage | $0M–$1M | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 96 | Redflow | Zinc-bromine flow batteries | $0M–$1M | Strong Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $61M | Partial Confidence |
| 97 | Azelio | Thermal solar storage systems | $0 | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $268M | Partial Confidence |
| 98 | Ambri | Liquid metal batteries | $15M–$35M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $223M | Partial Confidence |

This chart, included in our LDES market deck, compares the 2026 size of the LDES market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the LDES market
Insights
- The LDES market is highly concentrated at the top, with the 10 largest companies representing about 80% of the total valuation midpoint across the full dataset.
- Iron-air storage has become the most valuable LDES category, largely because Form Energy alone sits near the top of the market with a valuation range of $3.1B–$4.0B.
- Flow-battery startups are the broadest technical cluster in the LDES market, but the valuation spread is extreme, from single-digit millions to CMBlu Energy at $1.2B.
- CMBlu Energy stands out on capital efficiency, because a $1.2B valuation on $165M of funding implies a value-to-funding ratio of about 7.3x.
- The public LDES market is much harsher than late-stage private markets, with Corre Energy, ESS Tech, Brenmiller Energy, Redflow, and Azelio showing major downside from historic funding levels.
- Thermal and industrial heat storage remain meaningful LDES segments, with Antora Energy, Malta, RedoxBlox / Tempo, Fourth Power, MGA Thermal, and Brenmiller Energy covering very different use cases.
- The median valuation is only about $35M, while the top company is worth about $3.6B, which shows how early and uneven the LDES startup market still is.

This chart, included in our LDES market deck, looks at Form Energy’s strategy in long-duration energy storage
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the LDES market based on their current valuation.
Estimating startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many LDES companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed LDES companies, or official acquisition prices.
When an LDES startup is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When an LDES startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, project pipeline, manufacturing capacity, customer traction, or deployment history, combined with valuation multiples from comparable companies in the same market.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable LDES startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, technology maturity, commercial deployments, or project traction.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency, and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the LDES market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, included in our LDES market deck, illustrates yearly funding for LDES startups
Related blog posts
- What is the latest news in the LDES market?
- What are the latest funding developments in the LDES market?
- What is new in the LDES market?
- How funding activity has evolved in the LDES market
- What are the fundraising trends in the LDES market?
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.