What are the most valued startups in the physical AI market?
Explore our monthly updated ranking of the most valuable startups in the physical AI market.

In our updated market reports, you will find everything you need
Physical AI combines artificial intelligence with robots, autonomous machines, sensors, and software that interact with the real world.
This ranking tracks the leading physical AI startups using their latest reported or estimated valuations.
We update the list every month as companies raise capital, complete acquisitions, prepare listings, or disclose new operating information.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable physical AI startup | Figure AI, $39.0B–$40.0B |
| Second most valuable physical AI startup | Applied Intuition, $14.0B–$17.0B |
| Median physical AI startup valuation | Approximately $330M |
| Share of physical AI valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 67% |
| Top physical AI valuation versus the median | Approximately 120 times higher |
| Median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 3.4 times |
| Physical AI startups valued at $1B+ | 32 |
Top startups in the physical AI market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the physical AI market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Figure AI | General-purpose humanoid robots | $39.0B–$40.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.8B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Applied Intuition | Vehicle autonomy development software | $14.0B–$17.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $802M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | Skild AI | Robot foundation models | $14.0B–$15.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.8B | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | 1X Technologies | Home humanoid androids | $10.0B–$12.0B | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Observed | $134M | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | NEURA Robotics | Cognitive humanoid robot platform | $7.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.6B | Partial Confidence |
| 6 | Unitree Robotics | Quadruped and humanoid robots | $5.9B–$7.0B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $252M | Partial Confidence |
| 7 | AgiBot | Embodied AI humanoid robots | $5.5B–$6.8B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $84M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | Physical Intelligence | Universal robot AI models | $5.4B–$5.8B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.1B | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Apptronik | Apollo humanoid robots | $5.0B–$5.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $1.0B | Partial Confidence |
| 10 | Geek+ | Warehouse AMR automation systems | $4.1B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $791M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Galbot | Embodied humanoid robots | $2.9B–$3.4B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $800M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Linkerbot | Dexterous robotic hands | $2.8B–$3.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $360M | Low Confidence |
| 13 | Spirit AI | Embodied AI robot brain | $2.8B–$3.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $425M | Strong Confidence |
| 14 | X Square Robot | Physical AI foundation models | $2.8B–$3.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $423M | Partial Confidence |
| 15 | Agility Robotics | Warehouse bipedal robots | $2.4B–$2.6B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Observed | $579M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | Exotec | Skypod warehouse robotics systems | $1.8B–$2.3B | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $446M | Full Confidence |
| 17 | Field AI | Robotics autonomy foundation models | $1.9B–$2.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $405M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Generalist AI | General-purpose robot foundation models | $2.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $500M | Low Confidence |
| 19 | Hai Robotics | Case-handling warehouse robots | $1.8B–$2.2B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $330M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | Locus Robotics | Warehouse AMR fulfillment robots | $1.7B–$2.1B | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $424M | Partial Confidence |
| 21 | Leju Robotics | Humanoid robotics systems | $1.4B–$2.1B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $252M | Partial Confidence |
| 22 | LimX Dynamics | General-purpose humanoid robots | $1.5B–$2.0B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $296M | Partial Confidence |
| 23 | Dexterity | Warehouse robotic manipulation | $1.5B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $296M | Partial Confidence |
| 24 | PaXini Tech | Tactile humanoid robotics | $1.5B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $284M | Partial Confidence |
| 25 | EngineAI | General-purpose humanoid robots | $1.4B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $212M | Partial Confidence |
| 26 | RobotEra | Full-stack humanoid robots | $1.4B–$1.6B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $598M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Astribot | Cable-driven humanoid robots | $1.4B–$1.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $150M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | Gecko Robotics | Infrastructure inspection robots | $1.2B–$1.5B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $347M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Fourier Intelligence | Humanoid rehabilitation robots | $1.1B–$1.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $232M | Partial Confidence |
| 30 | Noetix Robotics | Affordable consumer humanoid robots | $1.0B–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $214M | Partial Confidence |
| 31 | Mujin | Industrial robot intelligence controllers | $950M–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $283M | Partial Confidence |
| 32 | Standard Bots | Industrial AI robot arms | $1.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $265M | Partial Confidence |
| 33 | Collaborative Robotics | Practical collaborative robots | $650M–$900M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $140M | Full Confidence |
| 34 | Fabric | Robotic micro-fulfillment platform | $650M–$850M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $336M | Full Confidence |
| 35 | Booster Robotics | Developer humanoid robot platforms | $550M–$850M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42M | Partial Confidence |
| 36 | Bear Robotics | Autonomous service robots | $550M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $176M | Strong Confidence |
| 37 | GreyOrange | AI warehouse fulfillment automation | $500M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $415M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | OTTO Motors | Industrial autonomous mobile robots | $550M–$600M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $86M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | VisionNav Robotics | Driverless industrial vehicles | $450M–$700M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $156M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | ANYbotics | Industrial inspection robot dogs | $400M–$600M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $152M | Strong Confidence |
| 41 | RoboForce | Industrial robo-labor systems | $350M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $67M | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | MagicLab | Humanoid and quadruped robots | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $89M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Vecna Robotics | Warehouse material-handling robots | $400M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $143M | Partial Confidence |
| 44 | Sanctuary AI | General-purpose humanoid robots | $300M–$550M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $59M | Low Confidence |
| 45 | Covariant | Warehouse robotic AI | $300M–$500M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $222M | Full Confidence |
| 46 | Wandelbots | Industrial robot programming software | $300M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $126M | Partial Confidence |
| 47 | Berkshire Grey | Warehouse robotic automation systems | $375M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $676M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | Carbon Robotics | AI laser weeding robots | $340M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $178M | Strong Confidence |
| 49 | Plus One Robotics | Parcel-handling vision robotics | $300M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Full Confidence |
| 50 | Foretellix | Autonomous vehicle safety validation | $280M–$420M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $135M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | Foxglove | Robotics data observability platform | $270M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $59M | Full Confidence |
| 52 | ForwardX Robotics | Autonomous warehouse mobile robots | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $140M | Partial Confidence |
| 53 | Seegrid | Autonomous pallet-handling AMRs | $290M–$330M | Strong Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $265M | Partial Confidence |
| 54 | Pickle Robot | Robotic truck unloading | $260M–$340M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $113M | Partial Confidence |
| 55 | Miso Robotics | Kitchen automation robots | $270M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $65M | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | Solinftec | AI farm operations automation | $220M–$350M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $110M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | Youibot | Industrial autonomous mobile robots | $220M–$340M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $78M | Partial Confidence |
| 58 | Addverb | Warehouse automation robots software | $220M–$270M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Implied | $143M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | RightHand Robotics | Robotic piece-picking systems | $220M–$270M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $125M | Strong Confidence |
| 60 | Diligent Robotics | Hospital service robots | $180M–$280M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $70M | Strong Confidence |
| 61 | Built Robotics | Autonomous construction equipment | $180M–$280M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $112M | Strong Confidence |
| 62 | Realtime Robotics | Industrial robot motion planning | $170M–$220M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $86M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | Ambi Robotics | AI parcel sorting robots | $160M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $64M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | Dusty Robotics | Robotic construction layout | $140M–$230M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $69M | Full Confidence |
| 65 | Third Wave Automation | Autonomous forklift systems | $150M–$210M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $97M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Micropsi Industries | AI vision control for robots | $130M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $45M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | Bluewhite | Autonomous off-road vehicle systems | $130M–$200M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $76M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | Unbox Robotics | Warehouse parcel sorting robots | $140M–$180M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $37M | Strong Confidence |
| 69 | Scythe Robotics | Autonomous commercial lawn mowers | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $83M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | Burro | Autonomous outdoor work robots | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $45M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Formant | Robot fleet operations platform | $110M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $45M | Full Confidence |
| 72 | Nomagic | Warehouse robotic picking | $120M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $85M | Partial Confidence |
| 73 | Chef Robotics | Food assembly robots | $105M–$170M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 74 | OSARO | Robotic picking AI software | $100M–$150M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $87M | Partial Confidence |
| 75 | Parallel Domain | Synthetic autonomy training data | $90M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $44M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | Verdant Robotics | Robotic precision crop spraying | $110M–$140M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $47M | Strong Confidence |
| 77 | Syrius Robotics | Warehouse AMR automation | $90M–$150M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $51M | Partial Confidence |
| 78 | Robust.AI | Collaborative warehouse robots | $80M–$140M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $43M | Full Confidence |
| 79 | Kepler Robotics | Industrial humanoid robots | $106M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $29M | Low Confidence |
| 80 | Magazino | Autonomous logistics robots | $75M–$120M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $50M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | Energy Robotics | Autonomous industrial inspection software | $70M–$110M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Partial Confidence |
| 82 | Slamcore | Spatial intelligence for mobile robots | $70M–$110M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $40M | Strong Confidence |
| 83 | DroidUp | Humanoid companion robots | $70M–$100M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $41M | Low Confidence |
| 84 | RGo Robotics | Mobile robot perception software | $60M–$105M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $20M | Full Confidence |
| 85 | Scallog | Warehouse fulfillment robots | $55M–$85M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 86 | InOrbit | Robot orchestration software | $50M–$80M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $13M | Partial Confidence |
| 87 | Gideon | Autonomous material-handling robots | $40M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 88 | Electric Sheep Robotics | Autonomous lawn-care robots | $35M–$60M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $26M | Strong Confidence |
| 89 | Canvas | Robotic drywall finishing | $30M–$60M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $24M | Strong Confidence |
| 90 | Caja Robotics | Goods-to-person warehouse robots | $30M–$55M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $26M | Partial Confidence |
| 91 | Attabotics | 3D robotic fulfillment storage | $20M–$45M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $154M | Partial Confidence |
| 92 | Jacobi Robotics | Robot arm motion-planning software | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Full Confidence |
| 93 | Monarch Tractor | Autonomous electric tractors | $15M–$40M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $220M | Partial Confidence |
| 94 | Naïo Technologies | Autonomous agricultural robots | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $65M | Partial Confidence |
| 95 | Duality Robotics | Robotics simulation and digital twins | $12M–$28M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 96 | FarmWise | AI robotic crop weeding | $10M–$30M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $140M | Partial Confidence |
| 97 | Tortuga AgTech | Robotic fruit harvesting | $10M–$25M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $28M | Strong Confidence |
| 98 | Aescape | Robotic massage systems | $17M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $128M | Strong Confidence |
| 99 | Cogniteam | Robot navigation management platform | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $10M | Strong Confidence |
| 100 | Advanced Farm Technologies | Robotic fruit harvesting | $5M–$15M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $34M | Strong Confidence |
Key valuation trends in the physical AI market
Insights
- The top 10 physical AI startups capture about 67% of the combined valuation in this ranking, showing that market value remains heavily concentrated among a small group of frontier platforms.
- Figure AI, Applied Intuition, and Skild AI represent approximately $69.5 billion in midpoint valuation, which shows that investors reward both embodied AI models and software-led autonomy platforms.
- Applied Intuition has reached a midpoint valuation near $15.5 billion after raising $802 million, making the autonomy software company far more capital-efficient than many hardware-intensive robotics businesses.
- Figure AI has a midpoint valuation of about 22 times cumulative funding, while Skild AI stands near eight times, revealing very different valuation premiums among leading physical AI companies.
- Physical Intelligence, Figure AI, Skild AI, and Spirit AI have raised roughly $5.1 billion combined while representing approximately $62 billion in midpoint valuation.
- Robot foundation-model companies can receive software-like valuation premiums, but Physical Intelligence's valuation remains only about five times its funding, which highlights the capital intensity of training and deploying robot intelligence.
- Geek+ provides an important public-market reference for physical AI, with a $4.1 billion market capitalization equal to about 5.2 times the warehouse robotics company's cumulative funding.
- Gecko Robotics has converted $347 million of capital into a midpoint valuation near $1.35 billion, showing that infrastructure inspection can support a billion-dollar physical AI business outside humanoid robotics.
- Foxglove's midpoint valuation of approximately $335 million is about 5.7 times its funding, suggesting that robotics data infrastructure can scale more efficiently than businesses that manufacture complete robotic systems.
- Berkshire Grey's $375 million acquisition value was only about 55% of its cumulative funding, showing that warehouse automation growth does not always translate into strong returns for investors.
- The physical AI market has 32 startups valued at $1 billion or more, but the median company is worth only about $330 million, which reveals a large gap between market leaders and the broader sector.
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the physical AI market based on their current valuation.
Estimating physical AI startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many robotics and autonomy companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a physical AI company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a robotics company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, ARR, deployments, customer traction, or robot fleet size, combined with valuation multiples from comparable physical AI companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, commercial partnerships, product maturity, or deployment activity.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each physical AI startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency, and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This reflects the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.
Related blog posts
- What are the fundraising trends in the physical AI market?
- Which startups have raised the most funding in the physical AI market?
- How strong is fundraising in the physical AI market right now?
- A complete list of funding deals in the physical AI market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.