PropTech Startup Funding 2025-2026
In our Prop Tech market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
SUMMARY
We analyzed every publicly disclosed equity round raised by pure-play PropTech companies between July 2025 and June 2026, a 12-month window covering every geography. We only kept rounds of $300K or more, and excluded construction technology, general-purpose fintech or insurtech, consumer smart-home electronics not tied to real-estate operations, debt-only rounds, M&A-only events, and companies outside the defined PropTech scope.
Over this period, fundraising in the PropTech market has been active but highly concentrated. The dataset includes 22 disclosed deals, 22 unique companies, and $648M raised.
Capital in the PropTech market is much more concentrated than deal count. The top deal alone represents 46.3% of total capital raised, the top 3 deals reach 64.4%, and the top 10 deals reach 93.0%.
The median PropTech round is $8.75M, while the average round is $29.5M. That gap shows how strongly a few large platform rounds distort the overall market picture.
Deal flow in the PropTech market averages 1.83 rounds per month. Monthly capital is much less stable, with January 2026 alone accounting for $342M, or 52.8% of the period’s disclosed capital.
Property Management Systems dominate the PropTech market by dollars. The category raised $419.5M, equal to 64.7% of total disclosed capital, across 8 deals.
Europe leads the PropTech market by capital, with $414.7M raised, or 64.0% of the total. North America is second with $123.5M, while the Middle East follows with $83.2M.
The PropTech market is still producing early-stage companies, but large checks mainly go to proven platforms. Seed and Series A rounds represent 63.6% of deals but only 25.5% of disclosed capital.
Follow-on rounds dominate the PropTech market by dollars. First financings appear in the dataset, but the largest checks went to companies with existing market proof, customer adoption, or category-platform positioning.
Repeat investors are not visible in this strict dataset. Based only on investors explicitly disclosed in the qualifying rounds, no investor appears in more than one deal.
This market map, featured in our Prop Tech market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the proptech market
What are all the funding deals in the PropTech market from July 2025 to June 2026?
The table below lists every disclosed equity round raised by pure-play PropTech companies between July 2025 and June 2026. We define PropTech as technology products that materially improve how real-estate assets are operated, managed, leased, or transacted.
Each row shows the company, what it does, its category, the deal date, the funding stage, the round size, the region, the main investors, and the announcement source. For a wider view of how PropTech fits inside real-estate operations, leasing, management, sales, and asset-level decision-making, we cover it in our PropTech market report.
| Company | What they do | Category | Date | Stage | Deal size | Region | Main investors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huspy | Digital real-estate brokerage and mortgage or home-buying platform operating across the Middle East and Europe | Real Estate Brokerage Software | Jul 2025 | Series B | $59M | Middle East | Not disclosed in dataset | TechCrunch |
| Buena | AI-enabled property management platform and roll-up model digitising residential property management in Germany | Property Management Systems | Jul 2025 | Series A | $58M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | Buena |
| MagicDoor | AI-native property management platform for independent landlords, automating leasing, maintenance, payments, and resident operations | Property Management Systems | Sep 2025 | Seed | $4.5M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | MagicDoor |
| PredictAP | AI-driven accounts payable automation software built for real-estate companies and property management finance workflows | Property Operations Software | Sep 2025 | Unknown | $5M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | PredictAP |
| Lastro | AI platform for real-estate agencies and property managers in Brazil, including AI assistant workflows for real-estate operations | Property Management Systems | Sep 2025 | Series A | $16M | Latin America | Prosus Ventures | LatamList |
| Lette AI | Agentic AI platform for property management, leasing workflows, resident engagement, and portfolio optimisation | Leasing Technology | Oct 2025 | Seed | $1.4M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | VCBacked |
| Arbio | AI-native property management and operating platform for short-term and holiday rental assets in Europe | Property Management Systems | Oct 2025 | Series A | $36M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | Tech.eu |
| Housr | Student-living technology platform for rental discovery and living experience management | Leasing Technology | Oct 2025 | Growth Equity | $9.9M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | BusinessCloud |
| dotega | Property management platform enabling homeowners’ associations and shared-property owners to self-manage buildings without a traditional property manager | Property Management Systems | Nov 2025 | Seed | $1.5M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | Tech.eu |
| Venn | Multifamily operating system helping landlords and property managers automate leasing, payments, maintenance, applications, and resident engagement | Property Operations Software | Nov 2025 | Series B | $52M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | FinancialContent |
| Flent | Premium rental housing platform using technology to manage furnished rental discovery, leasing, and tenant-landlord workflows | Leasing Technology | Jan 2026 | Seed | $2M | Asia-Pacific | Not disclosed in dataset | Entrackr |
| Cambio | AI-native commercial real-estate operations platform for capital planning, compliance, retrofit prioritisation, and operational decision-making | Property Operations Software | Jan 2026 | Series A | $18M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | Cambio |
| Mews | Hospitality property management and operating system spanning PMS, POS, RMS, housekeeping, payments, check-in, and hotel operations | Property Management Systems | Jan 2026 | Series D+ | $300M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | Mews |
| Visitt | AI-native property operations platform for commercial real estate teams, embedding workflows and automation into property management | Property Operations Software | Jan 2026 | Series B | $22M | Middle East | Not disclosed in dataset | CTech |
| Cadastral | Vertical AI platform for commercial real-estate professionals, including lease abstraction, underwriting, acquisitions, due diligence, and document intelligence | Real Estate Data Tools | Feb 2026 | Seed | $9.5M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | PR Newswire |
| Smart Bricks | AI-powered real-estate investment intelligence platform helping investors identify, underwrite, monitor, and optimise real-estate investments | Real Estate Data Tools | Feb 2026 | Seed | $5M | Europe | a16z | TechCrunch |
| Titl | AI and blockchain-enabled title verification, title search, monitoring, and land-registry infrastructure for real-estate transactions | Real Estate Data Tools | Feb 2026 | Seed | $2.5M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | PR Newswire |
| Spintly | Wireless, cloud-based access control, visitor management, attendance, and smart-building security systems for enterprise and commercial real-estate buildings | Building Operations Systems | Feb 2026 | Series A | $8M | Asia-Pacific | Accel; Enrission India; others | Economic Times |
| eVoost AI | AI-powered residential sales platform helping developers analyse buyer demand, optimise pricing, and improve property sales strategy | Real Estate Brokerage Software | May 2026 | Seed | $2.2M | Middle East | Not disclosed in dataset | EntArabi |
| Helium | Tech-driven rental management platform focused on residential rental property management | Property Management Systems | May 2026 | Seed | $0.6M | Asia-Pacific | Kunal Shah; Albinder Dhindsa; others | Economic Times |
| Findigs | AI-native leasing decisioning and tenant screening platform for residential operators, including affordable-housing and rent-guarantee workflows | Leasing Technology | Jun 2026 | Series C | $32M | North America | Not disclosed in dataset | Findigs |
| Zazume | AI-powered residential rental lifecycle and property management platform combining management tools, financial services, and portfolio acquisition in Spain | Property Management Systems | Jun 2026 | Growth Equity | $2.9M | Europe | Not disclosed in dataset | Tech.eu |
In our Prop Tech market deck, we identify pain points entrepreneurs should prioritize
OUR METHODOLOGY TO BUILD THIS TRACKER
We built this PropTech funding tracker by reviewing every publicly disclosed equity round raised by pure-play PropTech companies between July 2025 and June 2026. A company counts as pure-play when more than 80% of its activity is dedicated to technology products that improve how real-estate assets are operated, managed, leased, or transacted.
We applied four filters to build the dataset. First, we only included equity rounds, so debt-only rounds, grants, M&A-only events, and revenue financing are excluded. Second, we only counted rounds of $300K or more. Third, we only kept pure-play PropTech companies. And fourth, every entry had to be confirmed by a direct company announcement, a press release, or a tier-1 media report, with the source URL preserved for every row.
We also excluded construction technology, general-purpose fintech or insurtech not specific to real estate, and consumer smart-home electronics not tied to operating or transacting a property. The final dataset contains 22 disclosed deals across 22 unique companies, and every average, median, share, and concentration ratio is computed on that disclosed sample. Privately raised rounds that were never publicly announced are necessarily missing, which is a known limitation of any public-only PropTech funding tracker.
How active has fundraising been in the PropTech market?
As of June 2026, fundraising in the PropTech market has been active on deal count but uneven on dollars. Over the past 12 months, companies raised 22 disclosed equity rounds and $648M combined, which works out to roughly 1.83 deals per month.
The PropTech market did not produce a smooth monthly funding curve. July 2025, September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, January 2026, February 2026, May 2026, and early June 2026 all had qualifying deals, while August 2025, December 2025, March 2026, and April 2026 were quiet.
Dollar flow was even more lumpy. January 2026 alone produced $342M, mostly because Mews raised $300M, while May 2026 produced only $2.8M across two small rounds.
The median round size was $8.75M, which is more useful than the $29.5M average when reading the PropTech market. The average is pulled upward by a small number of much larger platform rounds.
If you’re interested in knowing more about the startups shaping this industry, check our market report covering PropTech.
How concentrated has fundraising been in the PropTech market?
As of June 2026, fundraising in the PropTech market has been highly concentrated at the top. Over the past 12 months, the single largest deal accounts for 46.3% of all disclosed capital, the top 3 deals reach 64.4%, and the top 5 reach 77.9%.
The Mews round alone changes the shape of the dataset. Without that $300M financing, the PropTech market would look far smaller and much more early-stage.
The top 10 deals account for 93.0% of all disclosed capital. That means most of the dollars in the PropTech market were captured by a limited set of companies, even though the dataset contains 22 separate rounds.
This concentration matters because headline funding totals can easily overstate broad market strength. In the PropTech market, aggregate capital is mostly a statement about a few scaled platforms, not evenly distributed liquidity.
How much of the PropTech funding signal is driven by outliers?
As of June 2026, a large share of the PropTech funding signal is driven by outliers. Over the past 12 months, 4 deals above $50M represented only 18.2% of disclosed deal count but drove most of the total capital.
Excluding rounds above $50M cuts total disclosed capital from $648M to $179M. That 72.4% reduction shows that megarounds are not statistical noise in the PropTech market; they are the main architecture of the funding picture.
The outlier effect also shows up in the gap between average and median. The average PropTech round was $29.5M, while the median was $8.75M, so a typical deal was much smaller than the headline average suggests.
This means the PropTech market should be read through two lenses at once. One lens is scaled platforms receiving large checks, and the other is a much smaller layer of seed and Series A workflow companies.
This chart, included in our Prop Tech market deck, looks at Compass’s strategy in proptech
Is the PropTech market broad with many targets, or narrow with few fundable companies?
As of June 2026, the PropTech market is broad enough to show real company formation, but narrow when measured by large fundable outcomes. Over the past 12 months, the dataset includes 22 deals across 22 unique companies, so there is no repeat-raiser concentration at the company level.
However, dollars are much narrower than company count. The top 5 deals represent 77.9% of capital, which means most funded companies did not materially change the size of the overall PropTech market.
The category spread also shows a narrow center of gravity. Property Management Systems account for 8 of 22 deals and 64.7% of capital, making them the clearest institutional funding center of the PropTech market.
That does not mean the rest of the market is irrelevant. It means that categories such as Real Estate Data Tools, Leasing Technology, and Building Operations Systems are still proving whether they can graduate from useful tools into large venture-scale platforms.
Is PropTech mostly an early-stage formation market or a late-stage scaling market?
As of June 2026, the PropTech market is mixed by deal count but late-stage weighted by dollars. Over the past 12 months, Seed and Series A rounds represented 14 of 22 deals, but only $165.2M, or 25.5% of disclosed capital.
Seed was the most common stage in the PropTech market, with 9 deals and 40.9% of total deal count. But those seed rounds added up to only $29.2M, or 4.5% of disclosed capital.
Late and other stages carried the dollar volume. Series B, Series C, Series D+, Growth Equity, and Unknown rounds raised $482.8M, equal to 74.5% of total disclosed capital.
This split suggests the PropTech market is still generating new companies, but investors reserve large checks for platforms that already touch core operating workflows. In real estate, slow sales cycles and integration-heavy buyers make proof of adoption especially valuable.
If you want to learn more about what investors are currently backing, check our report on the PropTech market.
Which categories attract the most investor attention in PropTech?
As of June 2026, Property Management Systems attracted the most investor attention in the PropTech market. Over the past 12 months, the category raised $419.5M across 8 deals, representing 64.7% of disclosed capital and 36.4% of disclosed deals.
Property Operations Software ranked second by dollars, with $97M raised across 4 deals. These companies sit close to operating budgets, finance workflows, compliance, leasing, maintenance, and asset-level execution.
Leasing Technology also had 4 deals, matching Property Operations Software by count but not by capital. The category raised $45.3M, which suggests investors are funding leasing automation but writing smaller checks than they do for broader operating systems.
Real Estate Data Tools produced 3 deals but only $17M. That pattern suggests strong experimentation around vertical AI and document intelligence, but limited proof so far that data tools alone can command platform-scale funding.
This chart, included in our Prop Tech market deck, illustrates yearly funding for proptech startups
Which categories attract disproportionately large checks in the PropTech market?
As of June 2026, Property Management Systems attracted the most disproportionately large checks in the PropTech market. Over the past 12 months, the category had 36.4% of deals but 64.7% of capital, giving it a capital-share to deal-share ratio of 1.78.
This premium exists because Property Management Systems are close to the system of record in real estate. They sit inside daily operations, payments, resident workflows, housekeeping, leasing, and owner reporting.
Real Estate Brokerage Software was closer to proportional, with 9.1% of deals and 9.4% of capital. That category’s two deals, Huspy and eVoost AI, show investor interest in transaction and sales workflows, but not enough breadth to define the whole PropTech market.
Real Estate Data Tools and Building Operations Systems attracted smaller checks relative to deal count. Their capital-share to deal-share ratios were 0.19 and 0.27, which means investors are still testing these categories rather than underwriting them as scaled platforms.
Which geographies matter most for fundraising in the PropTech market?
As of June 2026, Europe mattered most for PropTech fundraising by capital. Over the past 12 months, European companies raised $414.7M, equal to 64.0% of all disclosed capital, across 8 deals.
North America ranked second by dollars and close behind by deal count. The region produced 7 deals and $123.5M, which means it was active but less concentrated in very large platform rounds than Europe.
The Middle East was smaller by deal count but meaningful by check size. Huspy, Visitt, and eVoost AI together raised $83.2M, giving the region a $27.7M average deal size.
Asia-Pacific produced 3 deals but only $10.6M, while Latin America produced 1 deal worth $16M. Africa had no qualifying disclosed equity round in the dataset under this strict PropTech scope.
For more context on how geography shapes the opportunity, see our deeper analysis of the PropTech market.
Is the PropTech opportunity set broad or concentrated in one hub?
As of June 2026, the PropTech opportunity set is concentrated, but not in one single hub. Over the past 12 months, Europe, North America, and the Middle East together captured 95.9% of all disclosed capital in the PropTech market.
Europe leads because of a few large operating-platform rounds, especially Mews, Buena, and Arbio. That makes Europe look very strong by capital, but the region’s lead should be read as scale-platform concentration rather than broad startup density.
North America looks different. It produced almost as many deals as Europe, with 7 compared with 8, but raised less than one-third as much capital.
The rest of the world is visible but much smaller under this scope. Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa together represented only 4.1% of disclosed capital, even though Asia-Pacific and Latin America both had qualifying activity.
This chart, included in our Prop Tech market deck, compares the main business model options for proptech property management platforms
Is PropTech a market of small experiments or scaled financings?
As of June 2026, the PropTech market is a mix of small experiments and a few scaled financings. Over the past 12 months, 8 deals were below $5M, 7 deals were between $5M and $20M, 3 deals were between $20M and $50M, and 4 deals were above $50M.
Most companies in the PropTech market are still raising modest rounds. The median round size of $8.75M confirms that the typical disclosed financing is closer to a seed or Series A expansion round than to a growth megaround.
But most capital came from scaled financings. The four rounds above $50M included Mews, Huspy, Buena, and Venn, and excluding these rounds reduces the market from $648M to $179M.
This creates a barbell structure. The PropTech market has many small workflow and AI bets, but the dollars concentrate around platforms embedded deeply enough in operations to support larger institutional checks.
If you want to stay on top of the latest trends and funding patterns in this market, explore our full market deck on PropTech.
Who are the investors that appear the most in PropTech fundraising?
As of June 2026, no investor appears in more than one disclosed qualifying PropTech deal in this dataset. Over the past 12 months, the strict scope produced no repeat investor pattern based only on investors explicitly disclosed in the qualifying rounds.
That does not mean specialist real-estate investors were absent from the PropTech market. The dataset notes several investors appearing once, including RET Ventures, JLL Spark, 1Sharpe, Navitas, NOA, CIM Group, GV, EQT Growth, RPM Ventures, and Susquehanna Growth Equity.
The absence of repeat investors should be interpreted carefully. It may reflect limited disclosure in funding announcements as much as actual investor behavior, because many rounds name only lead investors or omit investor lists entirely.
The more useful signal is therefore not repeat-investor count, but the type of company receiving capital. The largest PropTech rounds went to companies that own recurring workflows in property management, operations, leasing, hospitality systems, or real-estate transactions.
For a broader view of the companies and categories behind those signals, read our PropTech market report.
This chart, featured in our Prop Tech market deck, illustrates revenue distribution by customer segment in the proptech market
INSIGHTS
The insights below come from reviewing every disclosed equity round in the PropTech market between July 2025 and June 2026. They are not row-by-row summaries. They are the reusable patterns that kept showing up across the 22-deal dataset, and they are meant to stay useful when reading any future PropTech funding announcement.
- The PropTech market is far more concentrated by capital than by company formation. One Mews round represents 46.3% of all disclosed capital, while 9 seed rounds represent only 4.5%. Any headline about funding recovery should therefore be checked against the few deals that actually drove the total.
- The median round is only $8.75M despite total capital of $648M. That gap between average and median is the clearest sign of a barbell market. Most companies are raising modest product-expansion rounds, while a few validated platforms absorb almost all late-stage capital.
- Excluding rounds above $50M cuts disclosed capital from $648M to $179M. This is not a small adjustment. It shows that megarounds are the main funding structure of the PropTech market during this period.
- Property Management Systems dominate because they are closest to a system of record. The category turns 36.4% of deal count into 64.7% of capital. Investors are paying a premium for platforms embedded in daily asset operations.
- Property Management Systems are not uniformly well-funded. The category’s average deal size is $52.4M, but its median is only $10.25M. The category contains both small local workflow products and globally scaled operating systems.
- AI is present in many funding narratives, but AI alone does not explain round size. The biggest checks went to companies where AI is attached to existing operational distribution. Investors are rewarding workflow ownership more than generic AI claims.
- The strongest PropTech funding signal is ownership of a painful recurring workflow. Revenue, compliance, occupancy, payments, operating cost, and leasing decisions are the budget lines that make buyers care. Companies close to those lines receive more credible capital signals.
- The market is moving from software as a dashboard to software as an operator. Platforms such as MagicDoor, Cambio, Visitt, and Venn are framed around executing tasks, not just showing analytics. This suggests operational automation is more valuable than passive visibility.
- Software-enabled property management roll-ups look unusually fundable. Buena, Arbio, and Zazume show that investors may back consolidation in fragmented property services when software can improve margins and execution.
- Real Estate Data Tools are deal-visible but capital-light. The category produced 13.6% of deals but only 2.6% of dollars. Vertical AI and data tools are being seeded, but investors have not yet validated them as large standalone platforms.
- Leasing Technology has a similar pattern. It represents 18.2% of deals but only 7.0% of disclosed capital. Investors want exposure to leasing automation, but they are not yet writing the same checks as they do for broader operating systems.
- Building Operations Systems are conspicuously underrepresented. Only one qualifying deal appeared, even though buildings are expensive to operate and decarbonise. Many relevant deals may sit in hardware, climate, energy, or construction categories outside this strict scope.
- Europe leads by dollars, but this should not be mistaken for broad ecosystem depth. Mews, Buena, Arbio, and Housr create a disproportionate European capital stack. The region’s strength is real, but it is concentrated in a few operating platforms.
- North America has almost the same deal count as Europe but less than one-third of Europe’s capital. That suggests North America is active in smaller AI, data, and leasing workflow bets. Europe captured the period’s largest operating-platform rounds.
- The Middle East is structurally meaningful despite only three deals. Huspy and Visitt both sit close to transaction or asset operations workflows. The region’s average deal size suggests investor conviction in platforms serving fragmented broker and operator markets.
- Asia-Pacific produced three qualifying deals but only 1.6% of disclosed capital. That pattern looks more like early product formation and local testing than institutional-scale PropTech funding in the scoped categories.
- Seed rounds are numerous but small. They account for 40.9% of deals but only 4.5% of capital. Early experimentation is alive, but investors are not spreading large checks across unproven PropTech entrants.
- Series A is the most balanced institutional stage in the dataset. It represents 22.7% of deals and 21.0% of capital. This is where investors still appear willing to price category potential before full late-stage proof.
- Follow-on rounds dominate capital because PropTech buyers are slow and integration-heavy. Investors appear to require evidence of adoption before writing large checks. That is consistent with real estate’s long sales cycles and mission-critical workflows.
- The absence of Africa is a meaningful negative signal, but not proof of no PropTech activity. Under this strict scope, no disclosed equity round above $300K met the source and category rules. The gap may reflect lower disclosure, more fintech-heavy activity, or less pure-play capital formation.
- The best forward-looking rule is to discount AI-native claims unless they own a recurring operational process. Vertical specificity helps, but workflow ownership is the real filter. The strongest future winners will likely combine both.
- The most defensible validation hierarchy is scaled transaction or payment volume first, embedded operator workflow second, strategic real-estate investors third, and AI novelty last. This hierarchy explains why platforms such as Mews, Venn, Buena, Findigs, and Visitt receive stronger capital signals than generic AI tools.
TechCrunch (Huspy), Buena (Series A), MagicDoor (Seed), PredictAP ($5M round), LatamList (Lastro), VCBacked (Lette AI), Tech.eu (Arbio), BusinessCloud (Housr), Tech.eu (dotega), FinancialContent (Venn), Entrackr (Flent), Cambio (Series A), Mews ($300M investment), CTech (Visitt), PR Newswire (Cadastral), TechCrunch (Smart Bricks), PR Newswire (Titl), Economic Times (Spintly), EntArabi (eVoost AI), Economic Times (Helium), Findigs (Series C), Tech.eu (Zazume)
Related blog posts
- A full list of funding deals in Prop Tech
- The startups that have raised the most funding in Prop Tech
