PropTech Startup Funding 2025-2026

What are all the funding deals in the PropTech market from August 2025 to July 2026?

The table below lists every disclosed equity round raised by pure-play PropTech companies between August 2025 and July 2026. We define PropTech as technology products that materially improve how real-estate assets are operated, managed, leased, or transacted.

Each row shows the company, what it does, its category, the deal date, the funding stage, the round size, the region, the main investors, and the announcement source. For a wider view of how PropTech fits inside the broader real-estate technology opportunity, we cover it in our PropTech market report.

How active has fundraising been in the PropTech market?

As of July 2026, fundraising in the PropTech market has been active but highly episodic. Over the past 12 months, pure-play PropTech companies raised 28 disclosed equity rounds and $604.8M combined.

The activity level works out to an average of 2.55 deals per month, with a median of 2 deals per month. That means the market had a recurring funding cadence, but not a steady one.

Monthly capital was much less stable than monthly deal flow. January 2026 alone produced $342.5M, mostly because Mews raised $300M in that month.

June 2026 was the strongest month by deal count, with 7 deals. But June capital reached only $73.4M, which shows that a broad month does not necessarily mean a large-dollar month.

For more context on the companies behind this activity, see our PropTech market report.

How concentrated has fundraising been in the PropTech market?

As of July 2026, fundraising in the PropTech market is very concentrated at the top. Over the past 12 months, the largest deal alone represented 49.6% of all disclosed capital raised.

The top 3 deals accounted for 64.2% of total capital, while the top 5 reached 73.7%. The top 10 deals reached 88.7%, which leaves limited capital for the rest of the market.

The clearest driver is the $300M Mews round. It is not just the largest deal in the dataset; it changes how the entire PropTech market looks in aggregate.

This concentration means the total funding number should not be read as broad market liquidity. It is more accurate to say that a few scaled platforms absorbed most visible capital.

How much of the PropTech funding signal is driven by outliers?

As of July 2026, a large part of the PropTech funding signal is driven by outliers. Over the past 12 months, rounds above $50M represented only 2 of 28 deals but 58.2% of disclosed capital.

Excluding rounds above $50M cuts total disclosed capital from $604.8M to $252.8M. That is the cleanest stress test for how much the headline number depends on unusually large rounds.

The median round size was $5.0M, while the average round size was $21.6M. The gap between those two numbers confirms that the average is not representative of the typical PropTech company.

The outlier issue matters because the PropTech market contains many small seed rounds and only a few scale financings. Without the largest checks, the market looks more like a modest workflow-software funding window.

Is the PropTech market broad with many targets, or narrow with few fundable companies?

As of July 2026, the PropTech market is broad in company formation but narrow in scale capital. Over the past 12 months, the dataset includes 28 disclosed deals across 27 unique companies.

That deal-to-company ratio shows that most companies raised only once during the window. Baselane is the main exception, because its Series A and Series B were both included.

Category breadth is real. The dataset includes Property Management Systems, Property Operations Software, Leasing Technology, Real Estate Data Tools, Real Estate Brokerage Software, and Building Operations Systems.

But capital breadth is much weaker. Property Management Systems and Property Operations Software together captured 82.5% of total disclosed capital, which means the most fundable part of PropTech sits close to recurring operations.

We go deeper on this split between formation breadth and capital concentration in our deeper analysis of the PropTech market.

Is PropTech mostly an early-stage formation market or a late-stage scaling market?

As of July 2026, the PropTech market looks like an early-stage formation market by deal count and a late-stage scaling market by capital. Over the past 12 months, Seed rounds represented 14 of 28 deals but only 7.0% of total disclosed dollars.

Seed activity is therefore broad but small. The median Seed round was $2.35M, and the average Seed round was $3.04M.

Later stages drove most of the dollars. Series B, Series C, Series D+, Growth Equity, and Unknown-stage rounds together represented $469.8M, or 77.7% of total disclosed capital.

The most important contrast is Series D+. One Mews round represented 3.6% of deals but 49.6% of capital, so stage maturity is concentrated rather than evenly distributed.

Which categories attract the most investor attention in PropTech?

As of July 2026, Property Management Systems attracted the most investor attention by capital in the PropTech market. Over the past 12 months, the category raised $365.0M, or 60.4% of total disclosed capital.

Property Management Systems also led by deal count with 8 deals, equal to 28.6% of all disclosed rounds. That makes it the strongest category on both activity and dollars.

Property Operations Software ranked second with $133.4M across 7 deals. It represented 22.1% of capital and 25.0% of deal count, which points to more consistent mid-sized funding.

Leasing Technology, Real Estate Data Tools, Brokerage Software, and Building Operations Systems were all visible, but none came close to the top two categories. The PropTech market is broad, but investor attention still clusters around operating workflows.

Which categories attract disproportionately large checks in the PropTech market?

As of July 2026, Property Management Systems attracted the most disproportionately large checks in the PropTech market. Over the past 12 months, it captured 60.4% of capital from only 28.6% of deals, giving it a capital-share to deal-share ratio of 2.11.

The category’s average round was $45.6M, but its median was only $4.0M. That gap shows the category is internally polarized between scaled platforms and smaller workflow startups.

Property Operations Software looked more balanced. It captured 22.1% of capital from 25.0% of deals, with an $18.0M median round, which indicates more repeatable mid-sized financing.

Real Estate Brokerage Software was the weakest category by capital conversion. It represented 10.7% of deals but only 0.8% of capital, suggesting transaction-enablement tools need large marketplace scale to attract bigger checks.

Which geographies matter most for fundraising in the PropTech market?

As of July 2026, Europe and North America mattered most for fundraising in the PropTech market. Over the past 12 months, they represented 85.7% of all disclosed capital combined.

Europe led by capital with $360.2M, or 59.6% of total disclosed dollars. That lead was heavily shaped by Mews, which alone raised $300M.

North America led by deal count with 9 deals, equal to 32.1% of all disclosed rounds. It raised $157.9M, or 26.1% of capital, which shows breadth without the same scale concentration as Europe.

Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa were all visible, but each remained smaller by dollars. Together, those four regions represented only 14.3% of disclosed capital.

For a fuller geography-by-geography view, see our market report covering PropTech funding by region.

Is the PropTech opportunity set broad or concentrated in one hub?

As of July 2026, the PropTech opportunity set is geographically broad but capital-weighted toward a few hubs. Over the past 12 months, deals appeared across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa.

North America and Europe were the core hubs. They represented 17 of 28 deals and 85.7% of total disclosed capital.

The rest of the map was active but capital-light. Asia-Pacific had 5 deals and $39.1M, the Middle East had 4 deals and $26.6M, Latin America had 1 deal and $16.0M, and Africa had 1 deal and $5.0M.

This means PropTech demand is not confined to one region. But institutional-scale funding still concentrates around companies with clearer access to large real-estate operating markets.

Is PropTech a market of small experiments or scaled financings?

As of July 2026, the PropTech market is a barbell between small experiments and a few scaled financings. Over the past 12 months, 12 deals were below $5M, while 2 deals were above $50M.

The middle of the market was thinner. There were 9 deals between $5M and $20M, and 5 deals between $20M and $50M.

The median round size was $5.0M, which shows that the typical PropTech financing was still relatively small. But the average round size was $21.6M because the largest two rounds pulled the market upward.

The $20M to $50M band is the best evidence of graduation beyond seed experimentation. Those rounds were tied to leasing decisioning, property operations, community management, and property management scale.

If you want to benchmark future rounds against this size distribution, use our full market deck on PropTech funding patterns.

Do first financings or follow-on financings dominate the PropTech market?

As of July 2026, follow-on financings dominate the PropTech market by capital, while first financings remain important by deal count. Over the past 12 months, the largest checks mostly went to companies with prior funding history or proven operating scale.

First financings were numerous, especially at Seed. But they rarely moved the total capital figure because most first rounds were in the low-single-digit millions.

Follow-on rounds carried the market’s dollar story. Mews, Venn, Arbio, Findigs, MyGate, Baselane, Cambio, and Visitt all raised larger rounds tied to more established operating workflows.

This matters because PropTech investors appear to reward workflow depth more than novelty. Companies embedded in rent collection, property operations, hospitality systems, leasing decisioning, and community management received stronger capital validation.

Who are the investors that appear the most in PropTech fundraising?

As of July 2026, investor repetition in the PropTech market was weak. Over the past 12 months, Matrix Partners was the only investor that clearly appeared in more than one qualifying disclosed deal.

Both Matrix Partners appearances came from Baselane. That means the repeat count reflects follow-on conviction in one company, not broad multi-company coverage of the PropTech market.

Other investors appeared in individual deals, including Prosus Ventures, a16z, Accel, Athera Venture Partners, Dharana Capital, and Tenity. But the provided source set does not show another investor making more than one qualifying disclosed PropTech deal.

That makes the company type more informative than the investor list. The strongest signal is whether a company owns an unavoidable real-estate workflow, not whether it belongs to a visible repeat-investor cluster.

Who is the author of this content?

NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM

We track new markets so founders and investors can move faster

We build living "market pitch" documents for emerging markets: AI, synthetic biology, new proteins, and more. Instead of outdated PDFs or hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what's really happening: key players, deals, regulations, and signals that matter. Learn more about us.