What are the most valuable MedTech startups?

Whether you're building or investing in the MedTech market, our report covers everything you need to know: the players, the money, and what's coming next.
Summary
Natera is the most valuable company in our MedTech ranking today at about $61.4 billion, while Oura leads the private-startup group at roughly $12.9 billion to $14.1 billion.
The top of the ranking is unusually concentrated. Natera, Dexcom, ResMed, Guardant Health and Tempus AI are worth roughly $166 billion combined, close to 70% of the value represented by the top 15 companies.
Public companies still dominate the biggest outcomes. Most of the top 15 are listed or have already been acquired, while only a handful of private MedTech companies have pushed beyond the $5 billion or $10 billion level.
Diagnostics is the strongest valuation cluster. Natera, Guardant Health, GRAIL and HeartFlow alone are worth about $98 billion, before counting Tempus AI or the long tail of smaller diagnostic businesses.
Wearables have become the standout private consumer-health category. Oura and WHOOP together are worth more than $23 billion, showing that recurring subscriptions and continuous health data can support valuations once associated mainly with established medical-device companies.
AI is producing billion-dollar MedTech companies, but mostly when it sits inside something healthcare buyers already pay for. The biggest examples are tied to diagnostics, treatment, imaging, clinical workflows or drug development rather than AI as a standalone product.
Recurring use is one of the clearest common threads across the leaders. Repeated tests, replacement sensors, consumables, subscriptions and ongoing care create stronger economics than a one-time device sale.
Some of the most talked-about categories are still smaller than the headlines suggest. Surgical robotics and brain-computer interfaces have several valuable companies, but most of their aggregate value remains concentrated in one or two leaders.
The $1 billion unicorn line is crowded enough that it is becoming a weak separator. Several companies sit just above, below or across that threshold, while the real category leaders are already worth $5 billion, $10 billion, $20 billion or more.
Funding history is a poor shortcut for current value. Some companies turned a few hundred million dollars of capital into multi-billion-dollar valuations, while others raised close to or above $1 billion and later ended up worth far less.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us

In our report covering the medtech market, we turn what is vague and complex into simple, useful visuals. Market maps like this one show you at a glance where every startup stands.
Top startups in the MedTech market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the MedTech market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you need to dig deeper and get more detailed data, please check our report covering the MedTech market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natera | Cell-free DNA diagnostic testing | $61.4B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $152M | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Dexcom | Continuous glucose monitoring systems | $32.8B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $71.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | ResMed | Sleep and respiratory medical devices | $31.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $24M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Guardant Health | Liquid-biopsy cancer diagnostics | $25.1B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $450M | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | Tempus AI | AI-driven precision medicine platform | $15.1B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$1.3B | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Oura | Smart-ring health and sleep tracking | $12.9B–$14.1B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Observed | $1.6B | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | WHOOP | Wearable human-performance monitoring platform | $10.1B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $980M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Neuralink | Implantable brain-computer interfaces | $9.0B–$11.0B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $1.33B | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Insulet | Tubeless automated insulin delivery | $9.4B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $119.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | Hinge Health | Digital musculoskeletal care platform | $7.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $853.9M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | GRAIL | Multi-cancer early detection blood tests | $6.9B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $2.0B | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | Sword Health | AI-powered virtual physical therapy | $4.8B–$5.5B | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $392.2M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | HeartFlow | AI coronary artery diagnostics | $4.5B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $856M | Strong Confidence |
| 14 | Axonics | Sacral neuromodulation medical devices | $3.7B | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $163.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | iRhythm | Wearable cardiac rhythm monitoring | $3.6B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $99M | Strong Confidence |
| 16 | CMR Surgical | Versius soft-tissue surgical robotics | $2.4B–$3.2B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$1.35B | Strong Confidence |
| 17 | Butterfly Network | Handheld ultrasound imaging platform | $2.5B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $354M | Strong Confidence |
| 18 | Insitro | AI-enabled drug discovery platform | $2.0B–$2.8B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $643M | Strong Confidence |
| 19 | Noah Medical | Robotic bronchoscopy for lung diagnosis | $1.8B–$2.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | ~$517M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | Imperative Care | Stroke and vascular intervention devices | $1.5B–$1.8B | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $552.9M | Strong Confidence |
| 21 | Kestra Medical Technologies | Wearable cardiac defibrillation and monitoring | $1.6B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$196M | Strong Confidence |
| 22 | Viz.ai | AI disease detection coordination | $1.3B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $289M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Owkin | AI for precision drug development | $1.3B–$1.8B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $304.1M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Distalmotion | Dexter soft-tissue surgical robot | $1.1B–$1.8B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$390M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | Aidoc | Enterprise clinical imaging AI | $1.1B–$1.7B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $564M | Strong Confidence |
| 26 | Virta Health | Virtual metabolic disease treatment | $1.1B–$1.4B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | ~$395M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Eight Sleep | Temperature-controlled smart sleep systems | $1.1B–$1.4B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $305M | Strong Confidence |
| 28 | Omada Health | Virtual chronic disease care | $1.2B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $529.7M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Tandem Diabetes Care | Automated insulin pump systems | $1.2B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $114.3M | Strong Confidence |
| 30 | Freenome | Blood-based early cancer detection | $1.0B–$1.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $1.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Precision Neuroscience | Minimally invasive brain-computer interfaces | $1.0B–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $430M | Strong Confidence |
| 32 | Noom | Digital weight management platform | $800M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $632.8M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | PROCEPT BioRobotics | Robotic waterjet prostate surgery | $1.0B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$349M | Strong Confidence |
| 34 | Beta Bionics | Automated insulin delivery systems | $995M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $356M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | PathAI | AI-powered digital pathology | $750M–$1.1B | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $255M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Ceribell | Rapid point-of-care EEG monitoring | $909M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $158M | Strong Confidence |
| 37 | Synchron | Endovascular brain-computer interfaces | $850M–$950M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $336M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Karius | Infectious-disease blood diagnostics | $650M–$900M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $340M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | Cleerly | AI coronary plaque analysis | $700M–$850M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $389M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | AliveCor | Personal and clinical ECG devices | $600M–$900M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $134M | Strong Confidence |
| 41 | Element Science | Wearable patch cardiac defibrillator | $580M–$870M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$193M | Strong Confidence |
| 42 | RapidAI | AI clinical stroke workflow platform | $600M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$125M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Biofourmis | AI-enabled remote patient care | $500M–$800M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $462M | Strong Confidence |
| 44 | Mendaera | Handheld robotic needle guidance | $500M–$750M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | >$130M | Partial Confidence |
| 45 | Prenuvo | Preventive whole-body MRI scanning | $550M–$700M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | ~$192M | Strong Confidence |
| 46 | Lunit | AI cancer imaging diagnostics | $612M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $137M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | ForSight Robotics | Robotic ophthalmic surgery platform | $500M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | ~$190M | Strong Confidence |
| 48 | Paradromics | High-bandwidth implantable neural interfaces | $500M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $121M | Strong Confidence |
| 49 | Visby Medical | Portable rapid PCR diagnostics | $450M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $525M | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | Senseonics | Implantable continuous glucose monitoring | $545M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $143.4M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | Click Therapeutics | Prescription software-based medical treatments | $330M–$625M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $253M | Strong Confidence |
| 52 | Ultromics | AI echocardiography diagnostics | $370M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $115M | Strong Confidence |
| 53 | Moon Surgical | Robotic laparoscopic surgical assistance | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$90M | Strong Confidence |
| 54 | Nomic Bio | High-throughput protein profiling platform | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $60M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Proscia | Digital pathology software platform | $350M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $130M | Strong Confidence |
| 56 | Qure.ai | AI radiology diagnostic software | $300M–$450M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $126M | Strong Confidence |
| 57 | Ultrahuman | Smart rings and metabolic monitoring | $350M–$390M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $194M | Strong Confidence |
| 58 | Healthy.io | Smartphone-based at-home medical tests | $250M–$400M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $188M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Biobeat | Cuffless wearable blood-pressure monitoring | $250M–$400M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $65M | Strong Confidence |
| 60 | Subtle Medical | AI-enhanced medical imaging software | $240M–$410M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $86M | Strong Confidence |
| 61 | Eko Health | AI-enabled digital stethoscopes | $250M–$350M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Implied | $168M | Strong Confidence |
| 62 | LumiraDx | Point-of-care diagnostic testing platform | $295M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $779M | Strong Confidence |
| 63 | Exo | AI handheld ultrasound platform | $250M–$330M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | ~$375M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | VitalConnect | Wearable cardiac and vital monitoring | $280M–$295M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $277M | Strong Confidence |
| 65 | Kaia Health | Digital musculoskeletal therapy platform | $285M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $123M | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Quantum-Si | Semiconductor-based protein sequencing | $282M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $500M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | Nevro | Spinal cord stimulation devices | $253M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $133.5M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | Withings | Connected medical and wellness devices | $220M–$280M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $96M | Strong Confidence |
| 69 | Podimetrics | Remote diabetic-foot monitoring platform | $190M–$310M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $105M | Strong Confidence |
| 70 | TytoCare | Remote AI-enabled physical exams | $180M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $225M | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | Big Health | Digital insomnia and anxiety treatments | $180M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $165M | Strong Confidence |
| 72 | binx health | Point-of-care molecular STI testing | $180M–$280M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $269M | Strong Confidence |
| 73 | Empatica | Clinical wearables and digital biomarkers | $170M–$280M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $32M | Strong Confidence |
| 74 | Propeller Health | Connected respiratory disease management | $225M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $62.9M | Strong Confidence |
| 75 | Current Health | Remote hospital-at-home monitoring | $150M–$300M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $66M | Strong Confidence |
| 76 | Clarius Mobile Health | Wireless AI handheld ultrasound | $180M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | ~$27M | Strong Confidence |
| 77 | Memic Innovative Surgery | Miniaturized flexible surgical robotics | $180M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$133M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | Bigfoot Biomedical | Smart insulin dosing technology | $150M–$250M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $162.6M | Strong Confidence |
| 79 | Activ Surgical | AI intraoperative surgical intelligence | $160M–$240M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$102M | Strong Confidence |
| 80 | XRHealth | VR-based remote therapeutic care | $140M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $73M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | Quanterix | Ultra-sensitive biomarker detection systems | $172M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $102M | Strong Confidence |
| 82 | Cala Health | Wearable non-invasive neuromodulation | $130M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $307M | Strong Confidence |
| 83 | Caption Health | AI-guided ultrasound acquisition | $150M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $62M | Partial Confidence |
| 84 | AppliedVR | Prescription VR chronic-pain therapy | $100M–$180M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $69M | Strong Confidence |
| 85 | Perspectum | Quantitative MRI diagnostic software | $100M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | ~$140M | Strong Confidence |
| 86 | Seer | Deep unbiased proteomics platform | $125M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $170M | Strong Confidence |
| 87 | Neuro42 | Portable MRI and surgical robotics | $90M–$160M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Strong Confidence |
| 88 | Sidekick Health | Digital chronic-disease care programs | $80M–$130M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $124M | Strong Confidence |
| 89 | Paige | AI-powered digital pathology | $102M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $240M | Strong Confidence |
| 90 | Ezra | AI-powered full-body MRI screening | $70M–$120M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | ~$43M | Strong Confidence |
| 91 | Hyperfine | Portable point-of-care MRI systems | $94M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | — | Low Confidence |
| 92 | BioIntelliSense | Continuous remote patient monitoring wearables | $70M–$90M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $143M | Strong Confidence |
| 93 | Nanox | Digital X-ray imaging platform | $45M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$117M | Strong Confidence |
| 94 | Scanwell Health | Smartphone-read at-home diagnostics | $20M–$50M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M | Strong Confidence |
| 95 | Akili | Video-game digital ADHD therapeutics | $34M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $270M | Strong Confidence |
| 96 | Pear Therapeutics | Prescription digital therapeutic software | $6M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $335M | Strong Confidence |
| 97 | Babylon Health | AI-enabled virtual primary healthcare | $0.6M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $1.1B+ | Partial Confidence |
| 98 | Vicarious Surgical | Single-port surgical robotics | $0.3M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$464M incl. public capital | Partial Confidence |
| 99 | Cue Health | Connected molecular diagnostic testing | $0M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $896M | Strong Confidence |

Our research about medical devices gets updated several times a month, so you always get the latest view of where things stand.
Which MedTech companies are worth the most today?
The most valuable company in our MedTech ranking today is Natera at about $61.4 billion, with a huge gap separating it from Dexcom and ResMed.
Natera is worth almost twice Dexcom’s $32.8 billion and ResMed’s $31.3 billion. Guardant Health follows at $25.1 billion, while Tempus AI completes the top five at $15.1 billion. Together, those five companies are worth roughly $166 billion.
The top of the market is much more concentrated than a long list of 99 companies might suggest. Natera alone represents roughly one-quarter of the combined valuation of the top 15 companies in our ranking. The top five account for close to 70%.
The mix is also striking. Three of the five biggest names, Natera, Guardant Health and Tempus AI, are centered on diagnostics, genomic information or precision medicine. Traditional medical devices remain huge through Dexcom and ResMed, but the highest valuations increasingly extend beyond physical hardware.
| Rank | Company | Main focus | Current valuation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natera | Cell-free DNA diagnostics | $61.4B |
| 2 | Dexcom | Continuous glucose monitoring | $32.8B |
| 3 | ResMed | Sleep and respiratory devices | $31.3B |
| 4 | Guardant Health | Liquid-biopsy cancer diagnostics | $25.1B |
| 5 | Tempus AI | AI precision medicine | $15.1B |
| 6 | Oura | Smart-ring health tracking | $12.9B–$14.1B |
| 7 | WHOOP | Wearable health monitoring | $10.1B |
| 8 | Neuralink | Brain-computer interfaces | $9.0B–$11.0B |
| 9 | Insulet | Automated insulin delivery | $9.4B |
| 10 | Hinge Health | Digital musculoskeletal care | $7.9B |
| 11 | GRAIL | Multi-cancer blood testing | $6.9B |
| 12 | Sword Health | Virtual physical therapy | $4.8B–$5.5B |
| 13 | HeartFlow | AI coronary diagnostics | $4.5B |
| 14 | Axonics | Sacral neuromodulation devices | $3.7B |
| 15 | iRhythm | Cardiac rhythm monitoring | $3.6B |
Are all the companies in this MedTech ranking really startups?
No. The MedTech valuation universe now mixes private startups with companies that have gone public and former startups that were acquired.
Natera, Dexcom, ResMed, Guardant Health, Tempus AI, Insulet, Hinge Health, GRAIL, HeartFlow and iRhythm are public companies. Axonics appears through its $3.7 billion acquisition by Boston Scientific. Lower down the ranking, LumiraDx, Nevro, Propeller Health, Caption Health, Paige, Akili and several others are represented by acquisition values.
A $30 billion listed company with established revenue and liquidity sits in a very different position from a private startup whose value comes from its last financing round.
The ranking is still useful because the underlying question is economic value: how large have companies built around these MedTech categories become? For readers specifically looking for private startups, the public and acquired companies need to be filtered out.

In our market report about medical devices, we look at what the winners do differently, so you can learn from the best instead of guessing.
How many private MedTech unicorns are there right now?
Our dataset contains 16 private MedTech companies that are clearly worth at least $1 billion today, with Noom sitting close enough to the threshold that the number could reasonably reach 17.
The group is far more diverse than the word “unicorn” suggests. Oura and WHOOP sell consumer-facing wearables. Neuralink and Precision Neuroscience build brain-computer interfaces. CMR Surgical, Noah Medical and Distalmotion build medical robots. Sword Health and Virta Health deliver care digitally. Aidoc, Viz.ai and Owkin are built around clinical AI.
The spread inside the group is huge. Oura is valued around $13 billion to $14 billion, while Precision Neuroscience sits around $1 billion.
| Private company | Focus | Current valuation |
|---|---|---|
| Oura | Smart health rings | $12.9B–$14.1B |
| WHOOP | Health-performance wearables | $10.1B |
| Neuralink | Brain-computer interfaces | $9.0B–$11.0B |
| Sword Health | Virtual physical therapy | $4.8B–$5.5B |
| CMR Surgical | Surgical robotics | $2.4B–$3.2B |
| Insitro | AI drug discovery | $2.0B–$2.8B |
| Noah Medical | Robotic bronchoscopy | $1.8B–$2.3B |
| Imperative Care | Stroke intervention devices | $1.5B–$1.8B |
| Viz.ai | Clinical AI coordination | $1.3B–$1.8B |
| Owkin | AI drug development | $1.3B–$1.8B |
| Distalmotion | Surgical robotics | $1.1B–$1.8B |
| Aidoc | Clinical imaging AI | $1.1B–$1.7B |
| Virta Health | Metabolic care | $1.1B–$1.4B |
| Eight Sleep | Smart sleep systems | $1.1B–$1.4B |
| Freenome | Cancer blood testing | $1.0B–$1.3B |
| Precision Neuroscience | Brain-computer interfaces | $1.0B–$1.1B |
| Noom | Digital weight management | $0.8B–$1.2B |
Why is Natera worth so much more than other MedTech companies?
Natera currently stands apart because investors are valuing large-scale diagnostics growth at a level few MedTech businesses have reached.
At $61.4 billion, Natera is roughly 1.9 times the size of Dexcom, almost twice ResMed and about 2.4 times Guardant Health. The gap is now large enough that Natera really does sit in its own tier.
The company also sits at the intersection of several valuable areas: genetic testing, oncology, reproductive health and recurring diagnostic volumes. Those characteristics can support much larger valuations than one-off equipment sales when investors expect testing volumes to keep expanding.
Removing Natera would cut roughly 25% from the combined value of our top 15. No other single company changes the top of the ranking that much.
Are diagnostics becoming more valuable than traditional medical devices?
Diagnostics are currently producing some of the biggest valuations in MedTech, especially when testing is recurring and linked to oncology or genomics.
Natera, Guardant Health, GRAIL and HeartFlow together are worth about $98 billion. Adding Tempus AI, whose business mixes diagnostics, data and precision medicine, pushes that group above $110 billion. Several smaller companies including Freenome, Karius, Cleerly, Lunit, Visby Medical, Ultromics, Qure.ai and LumiraDx extend the category much further down the ranking.
Medical devices are hardly disappearing. Dexcom and ResMed alone contribute more than $64 billion, while Insulet adds another $9.4 billion. Cardiac monitoring, insulin delivery, neuromodulation and surgical robotics also remain large categories.
What gives diagnostics extra upside is the combination of healthcare reimbursement, data, software and repeated testing. When that model scales, the valuation can start looking closer to a high-growth technology platform than to a conventional device manufacturer.

In our document detailing everything you need to know about medtech, you will always find fresh funding data, taken straight from our own verified funding database.
Are hardware MedTech companies still worth more than software companies?
Hardware still creates enormous MedTech companies, although software and data businesses have clearly broken into the top tier.
Dexcom, ResMed and Insulet are worth about $73.5 billion combined. Add iRhythm and the total moves above $77 billion. These businesses sell physical systems whose value comes from continuous monitoring, recurring consumables or long-term patient use rather than from hardware sales alone.
Software-heavy companies have also become large. Hinge Health is worth $7.9 billion, Sword Health roughly $5 billion, HeartFlow $4.5 billion and several clinical-AI companies sit between $1 billion and $2 billion.
The line between hardware and software is getting less useful anyway. Dexcom combines sensors with data. Oura combines a ring with subscriptions. ResMed pairs devices with connected-care software. The recurring usage around the physical product is doing a lot of the valuation work.
Are health wearables now a serious MedTech category?
Health wearables have become one of the largest private MedTech valuation clusters, led by Oura and WHOOP.
Oura is currently valued around $12.9 billion to $14.1 billion and WHOOP at $10.1 billion. Eight Sleep adds another $1.1 billion to $1.4 billion, while Ultrahuman is worth roughly $350 million to $390 million. Empatica, Biobeat and several cardiac-monitoring companies extend the category into more clinical applications.
What changed is how far the category has moved beyond step counters. Oura focuses heavily on sleep, recovery and physiological signals. WHOOP sells continuous performance and health monitoring through a subscription model. Eight Sleep attaches data and temperature control to the bed itself.
Consumer distribution, recurring subscriptions and growing healthcare relevance have been enough to push some wearables into the same valuation conversation as established medical-device companies.
Is Oura actually worth more than WHOOP?
Yes. Oura currently carries a higher valuation than WHOOP, although the gap is much smaller than it first appears.
Our current range puts Oura at $12.9 billion to $14.1 billion, compared with $10.1 billion for WHOOP. Using the midpoint, Oura is worth roughly one-third more.
Both companies have also absorbed substantial amounts of capital. Oura has raised about $1.6 billion, while WHOOP has raised roughly $980 million. Oura’s higher valuation comes with considerably more cumulative funding.
Both have done the harder thing: turning wearable hardware into an ongoing user relationship instead of a one-time device purchase.

Learning from others' mistakes is the cheapest lesson there is. In our report covering the medtech market, we look at what broke startups before you, so you don't repeat it.
Is Neuralink the most valuable brain-computer interface company?
Neuralink is by far the most valuable brain-computer interface company in this MedTech ranking.
Neuralink is worth roughly $9 billion to $11 billion. Precision Neuroscience sits around $1 billion, Synchron around $850 million to $950 million and Paradromics around $500 million to $650 million.
At the midpoint of those ranges, Neuralink is roughly ten times the size of Synchron, about nine to ten times Precision Neuroscience and close to 17 times Paradromics.
The BCI market has several credible challengers, but most of the capitalized value still sits in one company. Precision Neuroscience reaching roughly $1 billion gives the category a second private company around the unicorn threshold, but the gap remains huge.
Is AI actually creating billion-dollar MedTech companies?
Yes. AI is already behind several billion-dollar MedTech companies, although the highest valuations appear when AI is tied to a real diagnostic or care workflow.
Tempus AI leads the group at roughly $15.1 billion. Sword Health follows around $5 billion, HeartFlow at $4.5 billion, and Insitro sits between $2 billion and $2.8 billion. Viz.ai, Owkin and Aidoc all clear the $1 billion threshold based on our current estimates.
Lower down, Lunit, RapidAI, Qure.ai, Subtle Medical, Ultromics and Eko Health show that AI has spread across oncology, radiology, cardiology and workflow software.
The biggest companies use AI inside something healthcare buyers already pay for: diagnostic tests, medical imaging, treatment, clinical workflows or drug development. That seems to matter much more than the AI label by itself.
| Company | AI-heavy MedTech focus | Current valuation |
|---|---|---|
| Tempus AI | Precision medicine and diagnostics | $15.1B |
| Sword Health | AI-supported physical therapy | $4.8B–$5.5B |
| HeartFlow | Coronary diagnostics | $4.5B |
| Insitro | Drug discovery | $2.0B–$2.8B |
| Viz.ai | Disease detection and coordination | $1.3B–$1.8B |
| Owkin | Precision drug development | $1.3B–$1.8B |
| Aidoc | Clinical imaging | $1.1B–$1.7B |
Are digital-health companies still worth billions?
Yes, but digital health now has a much wider gap between the winners and everyone else.
Hinge Health is worth about $7.9 billion and Sword Health around $4.8 billion to $5.5 billion. Virta Health and Omada Health remain above $1 billion, while Noom sits around the billion-dollar line.
Then valuations fall quickly. Kaia Health was acquired for about $285 million. Sidekick Health is estimated around $80 million to $130 million. Big Health sits around $180 million to $300 million, and AppliedVR around $100 million to $180 million.
The post-boom market is pretty easy to read now: scale, recurring demand and a clear healthcare buyer still get rewarded. Simply delivering healthcare through an app does not.

In our research about medical devices, we always try to gather several sources and make estimates that make sense, so you can work with solid numbers.
Are surgical-robotics startups becoming huge companies?
Surgical robotics has produced several valuable MedTech startups, but the category remains heavily concentrated in its two biggest private companies.
CMR Surgical is worth roughly $2.4 billion to $3.2 billion and Distalmotion around $1.1 billion to $1.8 billion. Together, those two represent roughly three-quarters of the value across the main private surgical-robotics names in our dataset.
ForSight Robotics sits around $500 million to $650 million, Moon Surgical around $350 million to $550 million and Memic Innovative Surgery around $180 million to $230 million. Vicarious Surgical shows how badly the economics can deteriorate when commercialization disappoints: its public-market value has fallen close to zero in our current snapshot.
There is real money behind surgical robotics, but a broad wave of giant standalone companies has not arrived yet. Investors are clearly separating platforms that can reach hospitals at scale from companies still stuck between prototypes, regulatory progress and difficult commercialization.
Does raising more money usually lead to a higher MedTech valuation?
No clear relationship appears between cumulative funding and current MedTech valuation.
Sword Health has raised roughly $392 million and is worth around $5 billion. WHOOP has raised about $980 million and reached $10.1 billion. Neuralink has raised around $1.33 billion and is valued around $10 billion.
The opposite pattern appears elsewhere. Freenome has raised about $1.4 billion while its current valuation sits around $1 billion to $1.3 billion. CMR Surgical has raised roughly $1.35 billion and is worth around $2.4 billion to $3.2 billion. Several failed or acquired companies raised hundreds of millions before ending with much smaller values.
Funding databases are imperfect and capital needs vary sharply across diagnostics, robotics, hardware and software, so the comparison is rough. The spread is still too large to ignore: more capital does not guarantee more value.
| Company | Approx. funding | Current valuation | Valuation / funding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sword Health | $392M | ~$5.15B midpoint | ~13.1x |
| WHOOP | $980M | $10.1B | ~10.3x |
| Oura | $1.6B | ~$13.5B midpoint | ~8.4x |
| Neuralink | $1.33B | ~$10.0B midpoint | ~7.5x |
| Noah Medical | ~$517M | ~$2.05B midpoint | ~4.0x |
| Precision Neuroscience | $430M | ~$1.05B midpoint | ~2.4x |
| CMR Surgical | ~$1.35B | ~$2.8B midpoint | ~2.1x |
| Freenome | $1.4B | ~$1.15B midpoint | ~0.8x |
Which MedTech companies destroyed the most value after raising huge amounts of money?
The sharpest MedTech collapses in our dataset involve companies that raised hundreds of millions of dollars before ending up worth only a fraction of that capital.
Cue Health is the most extreme case in absolute terms here. The company raised roughly $896 million but its remaining public-market equity value fell to effectively zero. Vicarious Surgical accumulated around $464 million including public capital and is worth only about $0.3 million in our snapshot.
Babylon Health raised more than $1.1 billion and ended with an acquisition value around $0.6 million. Pear Therapeutics raised about $335 million before assets were acquired for roughly $6 million. Akili raised around $270 million and was acquired for about $34 million.
These are very different businesses, so one explanation does not cover every failure. But large funding histories offered little protection once reimbursement, commercialization, unit economics or adoption broke down.
| Company | Funding / capital raised | Current or exit value |
|---|---|---|
| Cue Health | $896M | ~$0M |
| Babylon Health | $1.1B+ | ~$0.6M |
| Vicarious Surgical | ~$464M incl. public capital | ~$0.3M |
| Pear Therapeutics | $335M | $6M |
| Akili | $270M | $34M |
| LumiraDx | $779M | $295M acquisition |
| Paige | $240M | $102M acquisition |

If you build or invest in the medtech market, you need to know which business models pay off now and which ones are fading. That's why our report covering it has a whole section on it.
Where does the MedTech unicorn cutoff sit today?
The current billion-dollar line runs through a surprisingly crowded part of the MedTech ranking.
PROCEPT BioRobotics is almost exactly at $1 billion. Beta Bionics is just below at roughly $995 million. Synchron sits around $850 million to $950 million, while PathAI’s estimated range of $750 million to $1.1 billion crosses the threshold.
Noom presents a similar case at $800 million to $1.2 billion. Freenome and Precision Neuroscience sit just above $1 billion, while Omada Health and Tandem Diabetes Care are around $1.2 billion.
The label is fragile here. A modest public-market move, new financing round or acquisition could push several companies across the line in either direction, and the gap between $900 million and $1.1 billion is not especially meaningful.
Why are public MedTech companies so much bigger than most private startups?
Public MedTech companies dominate the upper end because businesses usually reach the stock market only after proving far more commercial scale than younger private companies.
Nine of the top 15 companies in our dataset are currently public, and another one, Axonics, reached its valuation through an acquisition. Only Oura, WHOOP, Neuralink, Sword Health and CMR Surgical remain private within that top group.
The split becomes even stronger at the very top. The five largest companies are public or effectively priced by public markets, while the biggest private company, Oura, is worth around one-fifth of Natera.
Private companies can still reach enormous valuations before listing, as Oura, WHOOP and Neuralink show. But $10 billion remains exceptional in private MedTech, while several listed companies are already above $20 billion or $30 billion.
Which MedTech sectors produce the biggest valuations?
Diagnostics, continuous monitoring, wearables and digital care currently produce the biggest concentrations of value in our ranking.
Diagnostics is the clearest standout because Natera and Guardant Health alone contribute $86.5 billion. Adding GRAIL and HeartFlow takes those four beyond $97 billion before counting Tempus AI or the long tail of smaller diagnostic companies.
Diabetes technology also creates unusually large companies. Dexcom is worth $32.8 billion, Insulet $9.4 billion and Tandem Diabetes Care roughly $1.2 billion. Beta Bionics and Senseonics add another group around the billion-dollar and half-billion-dollar levels.
Wearables have become the strongest private consumer-health cluster through Oura and WHOOP, while digital musculoskeletal care has created Hinge Health and Sword Health. Surgical robotics and BCI attract a lot of investor attention, but their aggregate valuations are still much smaller.

Theory only gets you so far. In our document detailing everything you need to know about medtech, we dig up the real signals from the field and show you the ones worth watching.
Is MedTech becoming more about recurring revenue than selling devices?
The highest MedTech valuations increasingly sit around products that generate repeated testing, subscriptions, consumables or ongoing patient use.
Dexcom sells sensors continuously rather than relying on a one-time glucose-monitor purchase. Insulet’s insulin-delivery model involves recurring pods. Oura and WHOOP add subscription economics to wearable hardware. Natera and Guardant Health benefit when testing volumes expand. Hinge Health and Sword Health sell ongoing care rather than a standalone device.
Even several traditional-looking hardware categories now depend heavily on software, data and recurring engagement around the device.
That is a big reason some relatively simple physical products can support very large valuations. Investors are often valuing the lifetime economic relationship around the device, not just the device itself.
Does a $1 billion MedTech valuation still mean a company is exceptional?
A $1 billion valuation remains meaningful in MedTech, but it no longer puts a company anywhere near the top of the sector.
At least 32 companies in the full dataset have a valuation at or above $1 billion when public companies, private companies and acquisition values are included. Another small group has ranges that cross the threshold.
The distance from $1 billion to the leaders is enormous. A company worth exactly $1 billion is only about one-sixtieth the size of Natera, one-thirtieth the size of Dexcom or ResMed and one-tenth the size of WHOOP.
The more useful dividing lines now are closer to $5 billion, $10 billion and eventually $20 billion. Only a small number of MedTech businesses reach those levels.
Are the biggest MedTech valuations concentrated in just a few companies?
Yes. MedTech value is strongly concentrated at the top even though the market contains dozens of companies worth hundreds of millions.
The first five companies in our ranking are worth about $166 billion combined. The top 10 reach roughly $217 billion using the midpoint of valuation ranges. Natera alone contributes more than $61 billion.
By comparison, moving dozens of positions down the table can involve relatively little aggregate value. Companies ranked around 50 to 70 mostly sit between roughly $200 million and $600 million each.
It is a very long tail: lots of credible venture-backed and specialist public companies, but only a small group that has turned a successful product category into tens of billions of dollars of equity value.
So which MedTech startups are actually the most valuable today?
The clearest answer is that Natera leads the broader MedTech company ranking, while Oura currently leads the private-startup group.
Natera’s roughly $61.4 billion valuation puts it far ahead of Dexcom at $32.8 billion, ResMed at $31.3 billion and Guardant Health at $25.1 billion. Among companies that remain private, Oura leads at roughly $12.9 billion to $14.1 billion, followed by WHOOP at $10.1 billion and Neuralink around $9 billion to $11 billion.
Today’s winners come from very different business models: genomic diagnostics, continuous monitoring, cancer testing, wearables, precision medicine, digital care and neurotechnology.
The common thread is repeated use. Tests performed again and again, sensors replaced continuously, subscriptions renewed, clinical workflows embedded into hospitals and treatments delivered over time can create much more value than a single medical product sale.
Physical devices still matter enormously, but the top of MedTech is now full of companies that combine medicine with recurring data, software, diagnostics or continuous patient relationships.
Our methodology
Our objective was to estimate the most defensible current valuation for each company in the MedTech market rather than simply repeat the last valuation figure ever reported. We focused on businesses genuinely centered on MedTech and compared completed financing rounds, company announcements, regulatory filings, investor materials, financial disclosures, operating metrics, comparable transactions, public-market information and reputable financial reporting.
We kept directly observed valuations, implied valuations and estimated valuations separate. A recent completed financing round normally provided the strongest private-market anchor. For listed companies, current market capitalization could serve as the valuation reference, while a disclosed acquisition value could be used for acquired businesses that no longer had a meaningful standalone valuation.
When a financing amount was known but the valuation was undisclosed, we could estimate an implied range using stage-appropriate financing assumptions, revenue or ARR multiples, and comparable-company or transaction evidence. We did not mechanically average methods: newer and more direct evidence received more weight, and wider ranges were used when the evidence required more inference.
The ranking intentionally includes public companies, private companies and acquired businesses because the main question is how large MedTech companies have become economically. When we discuss private unicorns or private-startup leaders, we filter the public and acquired names out separately.
Funding totals are used as context rather than as a valuation method. Capital requirements differ sharply across diagnostics, robotics, hardware, software and digital care, and funding databases can vary, so valuation-to-funding comparisons should be read as directional rather than precise.
Key sources used for this analysis include Natera Investor Relations, Dexcom Investor Relations, ResMed financial results, Guardant Health Investor Relations, Tempus AI Investor Relations, the Financial Times on Oura, the Associated Press on Oura, Bloomberg on WHOOP, GRAIL Investor Relations, Hinge Health Investor Relations, HeartFlow Investor Relations, Boston Scientific on Axonics, Roche on LumiraDx, and Precision Neuroscience’s financing announcement. The broader ranking is available in our report covering the MedTech market.

In our report covering the medtech market, we don't want to repeat what boring consulting reports say. Instead, we show you the real and latest market signals that matter.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us