What are the most valued startups in the neurotechnology market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the neurotechnology market

In our neurotechnology market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The neurotechnology market combines brain-computer interfaces, neuromodulation implants, neurological diagnostics, brain imaging software and wearable stimulation devices.
Neuralink leads the ranking by a wide margin, while sleep apnea devices, clinical EEG platforms and specialist neuromodulation companies also account for substantial value.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, acquisitions, public market movements and newly disclosed startup valuations.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the neurotechnology market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable neurotechnology startup | Neuralink, $9.0B–$9.7B |
| Second most valuable neurotechnology startup | Inspire Medical Systems, $1.5B |
| Median neurotechnology company valuation | Approximately $137M |
| Share of neurotechnology valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 54% |
| Top neurotechnology startup valuation vs. median | Approximately 68 times |
| Median neurotechnology valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 3.4 times |
| Neurotechnology startups valued at $1B+ | 6 |

This market map, featured in our neurotechnology market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the neurotechnology market
Top startups in the neurotechnology market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the neurotechnology market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the neurotechnology market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neuralink | Implantable brain-computer interfaces | $9.0B–$9.7B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 2 | Inspire Medical Systems | Sleep apnea stimulation implants | $1.5B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $219M | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | BrainCo | BCI prosthetics and headbands | $1.1B–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 4 | Synchron | Endovascular brain-computer interfaces | $1.0B–$1.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 5 | SetPoint Medical | Vagus nerve autoimmune therapy | $800M–$1.2B | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $389M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Mainstay Medical | Chronic back-pain neurostimulation implant | $800M–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $146M | Partial Confidence |
| 7 | Merge Labs | Non-invasive ultrasound brain interfaces | $800M–$900M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $252M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Beacon Biosignals | AI-powered EEG biomarker platform | $650M–$950M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $133M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Ceribell | Rapid EEG seizure detection | $702M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $326M | Full Confidence |
| 10 | Amber Therapeutics | Adaptive urinary-incontinence neurostimulation | $500M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $100M | Partial Confidence |
| 11 | SPR Therapeutics | Temporary peripheral nerve stimulation | $650M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $94M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | StairMed | Implantable BCI and neuromodulation | $500M–$800M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $160M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | Precision Neuroscience | Minimally invasive BCI implants | $500M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 14 | MicroTransponder | Stroke-recovery vagus nerve stimulation | $450M–$700M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $180M | Partial Confidence |
| 15 | NeuroPace | Responsive epilepsy neurostimulation implants | $562M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $366M | Partial Confidence |
| 16 | ShiraTronics | Implantable migraine neurostimulation therapy | $430M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $107M | Full Confidence |
| 17 | Nalu Medical | Miniature chronic pain neurostimulation | $533M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $231M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Salvia BioElectronics | Implantable migraine neuromodulation therapy | $400M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $92M | Full Confidence |
| 19 | Neuros Medical | Post-amputation pain nerve stimulation | $370M–$650M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $124M | Partial Confidence |
| 20 | Presidio Medical | Ultra-low-frequency pain stimulation | $350M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $102M | Full Confidence |
| 21 | INBRAIN Neuroelectronics | Graphene brain-interface implants | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 22 | Nervonik | Peripheral nerve stimulation platform | $350M–$550M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $66M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Spiro Medical | Pulmonary neuromodulation for asthma | $335M–$560M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $67M | Full Confidence |
| 24 | Cala Health | Wearable tremor neuromodulation therapy | $330M–$520M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $195M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | Kernel | Non-invasive brain measurement | $300M–$500M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 26 | CoMind | Non-invasive cerebral blood-flow monitoring | $300M–$500M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $103M | Strong Confidence |
| 27 | Phagenesis | Dysphagia neurostimulation therapy | $280M–$420M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $71M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | Axoft | Soft implantable brain interfaces | $300M–$400M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $63M | Partial Confidence |
| 29 | Paradromics | High-bandwidth BCI implants | $250M–$350M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 30 | Zhiran Medical | Flexible invasive brain interfaces | $230M–$360M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $87M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | Theranica | Wearable migraine neuromodulation therapy | $220M–$350M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $86M | Full Confidence |
| 32 | Zeto | Wireless clinical EEG monitoring | $210M–$320M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $38M | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | Omniscient Neurotechnology | AI-powered brain mapping software | $180M–$340M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $87M | Partial Confidence |
| 34 | Nevro | Spinal cord pain stimulation | $250M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $156M | Strong Confidence |
| 35 | Brainomix | AI stroke imaging software | $170M–$300M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $59M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Neurable | Consumer non-invasive BCI | $190M–$270M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $65M | Partial Confidence |
| 37 | Magnus Medical | Personalized depression brain stimulation | $180M–$270M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $140M | Partial Confidence |
| 38 | ONWARD Medical | Spinal cord stimulation therapies | $213M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $350M | Strong Confidence |
| 39 | Neuspera Medical | Miniaturized sacral neuromodulation implants | $160M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $125M | Strong Confidence |
| 40 | Blackrock Neurotech | Implantable neural interfaces | $200M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 41 | NeuroXess | Flexible implantable BCI systems | $150M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $29M | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | Cadence Neuroscience | Closed-loop epilepsy neuromodulation | $140M–$240M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $41M | Full Confidence |
| 43 | iVEAcare | Neuromodulation for chronic diseases | $140M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Full Confidence |
| 44 | Aoyi Tech | Neural rehabilitation robotic systems | $140M–$230M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $28M | Partial Confidence |
| 45 | Neuracle | Clinical EEG and BCI systems | $130M–$210M | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $24M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Nyxoah | Sleep apnea neurostimulation implant | $167M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $256M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | Motif Neurotech | Implantable depression microstimulator | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $19M | Full Confidence |
| 48 | Gestala | Non-invasive ultrasound brain interfaces | $100M–$200M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $22M | Full Confidence |
| 49 | CVRx | Cardiovascular neuromodulation implants | $137M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $513M | Partial Confidence |
| 50 | Newronika | Adaptive deep-brain stimulation platform | $90M–$140M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $25M | Strong Confidence |
| 51 | Helius Medical Technologies | Tongue stimulation for neurorehabilitation | $105M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $552M+ | Partial Confidence |
| 52 | BrainsWay | Deep TMS psychiatric treatment | $105M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $76M | Partial Confidence |
| 53 | Spark Biomedical | Wearable withdrawal neurostimulation | $75M–$125M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Partial Confidence |
| 54 | Neuroelectrics | EEG and brain stimulation | $70M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $18M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Saluda Medical | Closed-loop spinal pain stimulation | $94M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $650M | Strong Confidence |
| 56 | BrainScope | Handheld traumatic brain-injury assessment | $65M–$105M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $53M | Partial Confidence |
| 57 | Nexstim | Navigated brain-stimulation systems | $82M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $34M | Partial Confidence |
| 58 | Epitel | Wearable wireless seizure monitoring | $65M–$95M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $13M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | CorTec | Implantable neural interface systems | $55M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $22M | Partial Confidence |
| 60 | NEUROPHET | AI brain imaging analysis | $70M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $39M | Partial Confidence |
| 61 | NeuralMatrix | Implantable neural-interface hardware | $45M–$90M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $16M | Low Confidence |
| 62 | g.tec medical engineering | BCI and EEG systems | $40M–$90M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 63 | icometrix | AI brain MRI analysis | $45M–$80M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $20M | Strong Confidence |
| 64 | Wave Neuroscience | Personalized brain stimulation treatments | $45M–$80M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $40M | Low Confidence |
| 65 | electroCore | Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation | $59M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $252M | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Coherence Neuro | Brain implants treating cancer | $45M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | Flow Neuroscience | At-home depression brain stimulation | $40M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Partial Confidence |
| 68 | Soterix Medical | Non-invasive brain-stimulation equipment | $35M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 69 | Neurovalens | Wearable non-invasive neurostimulation | $40M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $24M | Partial Confidence |
| 70 | NeuroSky | Consumer EEG biosensors | $25M–$70M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $18M | Partial Confidence |
| 71 | NeuroSigma | Trigeminal stimulation for pediatric ADHD | $35M–$60M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Low Confidence |
| 72 | Cognixion | Assistive neural communication | $35M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $13M | Partial Confidence |
| 73 | Piramidal | AI models interpreting brainwaves | $35M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Strong Confidence |
| 74 | EMOTIV | Consumer EEG headsets | $25M–$60M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 75 | Brainland Technology | Brain-computer interaction platform | $25M–$60M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14M | Low Confidence |
| 76 | Bitbrain | EEG hardware and neuroanalytics | $25M–$55M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 77 | Synergia Medical | Optoelectronic epilepsy neurostimulation | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14M | Strong Confidence |
| 78 | Neurolief | At-home migraine neuromodulation | $24M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 79 | PathMaker Neurosystems | Non-invasive ALS neuromodulation | $20M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 80 | BioSerenity | Connected EEG and sleep diagnostics | $28M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $77M | Partial Confidence |
| 81 | Cumulus Neuroscience | CNS clinical-trial biomarker platform | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 82 | Rune Labs | Precision neurology data platform | $20M–$32M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $57M | Partial Confidence |
| 83 | BrainSightAI | AI connectomics brain mapping | $18M–$28M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 84 | NeuroOne Medical Technologies | Neurodiagnostic and stimulation electrodes | $23M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $35M | Partial Confidence |
| 85 | Neuro20 Technologies | Wearable electrical neurorehabilitation system | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 86 | SpineX | Non-invasive spinal neuromodulation | $12M–$30M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 87 | Cognionics | Mobile dry-electrode EEG systems | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 88 | Sooma Medical | Portable depression stimulation devices | $15M–$22M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Strong Confidence |
| 89 | OpenBCI | Open-source EEG hardware | $10M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 90 | Pulvinar Neuro | Research brain-stimulation devices | $10M–$25M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 91 | Neuro Event Labs | AI seizure monitoring | $12M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $9M | Partial Confidence |
| 92 | Naox Technologies | EEG-enabled connected earbuds | $6M–$10M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M | Full Confidence |
| 93 | Neurosteer | Wearable clinical EEG monitoring | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Reach Neuro | Stroke recovery neurostimulation device | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 95 | EPIC Neuro | Minimally invasive stroke neurostimulation | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 96 | Cerora | Biosensor brain-health assessment | $2M–$5M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 97 | Novela Neurotechnologies | Wearable epilepsy monitoring platform | $1M–$3M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not provided | Low Confidence |
| 98 | Functional Neuromodulation | Alzheimer’s deep-brain stimulation | $0M–$2M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14M | Low Confidence |
| 99 | MyndTec | Neurostimulation rehabilitation therapy | $0.2M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $6M | Partial Confidence |

This chart, featured in our neurotechnology market deck, compares the 2026 size of the neurotechnology market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the neurotechnology market
Insights
- Neuralink represents about 28% of the combined midpoint valuation in the full neurotechnology ranking, making the market highly concentrated around one implantable brain-computer interface company.
- The top 10 neurotechnology companies capture approximately 54% of total midpoint valuation, while the highest-valued company is worth about 68 times the market median.
- SPR Therapeutics achieved a $650M acquisition value after raising $94M, producing a realized valuation-to-funding multiple of nearly seven times.
- Beacon Biosignals carries an estimated $800M midpoint valuation on $133M of disclosed funding, showing strong investor demand for AI-enabled EEG biomarkers and neurological data platforms.
- ShiraTronics, Salvia BioElectronics and Theranica have a combined midpoint valuation of about $1.35B on $285M of funding, highlighting the scale of investment in migraine neuromodulation.
- Zeto’s estimated $265M midpoint is almost seven times its $38M funding total, suggesting that modern clinical EEG systems can create value with less capital than implantable neurotechnology platforms.
- Several listed neurotechnology companies trade below cumulative funding, including Saluda Medical, ONWARD Medical and Nyxoah, which reflects public market caution toward long clinical and commercialization timelines.
- Ceribell stands out among listed neurotechnology businesses, with a $702M market capitalization that is more than twice its disclosed funding of $326M.
- The neurotechnology market has a clear valuation barbell, premium private platforms sit at the top, while several capital-intensive public companies trade close to or below invested capital.

This chart, featured in our neurotechnology market deck, shows why Neuropace is winning in neurotechnology
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the neurotechnology market based on their current valuation.
Estimating neurotechnology startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company and its stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed neurotechnology companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a neurotechnology company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a neurotechnology startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, annual recurring revenue, device sales, clinical adoption or customer traction. We combine these figures with valuation multiples from comparable neurotechnology companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, regulatory progress, clinical results or product traction.
Regulatory milestones are especially important in neurotechnology. Clinical trial progress, medical device approvals and reimbursement decisions can materially affect a company’s value.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because neurotechnology valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the neurotechnology market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, featured in our neurotechnology market deck, shows annual funding in neurotechnology startups
Related blog posts
- The most recent news in the neurotechnology market
- The most recent funding news in the neurotechnology market
- The latest update in the neurotechnology market
- The evolution of funding activity in the neurotechnology market
- The main fundraising trends in the neurotechnology market
- How large is the neurotechnology market in reality?
- A complete list of business models in the neurotechnology market
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.