What are the most valued startups in the carbon removal market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the carbon removal market

In our updated market reports, you will find everything you need
The carbon removal market is attracting growing investment across direct air capture, biochar, enhanced weathering, mineralization, biomass storage and ocean-based technologies.
This ranking compares 96 carbon removal startups using their latest reported valuations or our best evidence-based estimates.
We update this list every month to reflect new funding rounds, acquisitions, public-market movements and operating milestones.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the carbon removal market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable carbon removal startup | Climeworks, $1.5B–$2.1B |
| Second most valuable carbon removal startup | 1PointFive, $1.0B–$1.8B |
| Median carbon removal startup valuation | Approximately $54M |
| Share of carbon removal valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 57% |
| Top carbon removal valuation vs. median | Approximately 33 times higher |
| Median carbon removal valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 5.5 times |
| Carbon removal startups valued at $1B+ | 4 |
Top startups in the carbon removal market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the carbon removal market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more detaild about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the carbon removal market.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Climeworks | Direct air capture removal | $1.5B–$2.1B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1.0B | Partial Confidence |
| 2 | 1PointFive | DAC and sequestration hubs | $1.0B–$1.8B | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 3 | Heirloom | Limestone direct air capture | $1.0B–$1.6B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $203M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | Carbon Engineering | Liquid-solvent direct air capture | $1.1B | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $110M | Partial Confidence |
| 5 | Charm Industrial | Bio-oil carbon sequestration | $650M–$950M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $125M | Partial Confidence |
| 6 | CarbonCapture | Modular direct air capture systems | $400M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $115M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | Verdox | Electrochemical carbon capture systems | $400M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $80M | Partial Confidence |
| 8 | Terradot | Enhanced rock weathering removal | $350M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $58M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Neustark | Mineralizes CO₂ in recycled concrete | $350M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $69M | Partial Confidence |
| 10 | Deep Sky | Carbon removal project developer | $320M–$520M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $55M | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Arbor Energy | Carbon-negative power generation systems | $300M–$460M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $55M | Partial Confidence |
| 12 | Lithos Carbon | Enhanced rock weathering farms | $280M–$480M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $63M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | 44.01 | CO₂ mineralization in rock | $220M–$360M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $47M | Full Confidence |
| 14 | Aircapture | Modular direct air capture systems | $220M–$300M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $50M | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | Exomad Green | Industrial-scale biochar carbon removal | $180M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 16 | Avnos | Captures carbon while producing water | $180M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $128M | Partial Confidence |
| 17 | Graphyte | Buries stabilized waste biomass | $180M–$260M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Partial Confidence |
| 18 | Mombak | Amazon reforestation carbon removal | $160M–$280M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $30M | Partial Confidence |
| 19 | Vaulted Deep | Injects biomass waste underground | $170M–$250M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $40M | Full Confidence |
| 20 | Novocarbo | Operates biochar carbon-removal parks | $160M–$230M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $27M | Full Confidence |
| 21 | Varaha | Farm-based carbon removal projects | $140M–$220M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 22 | Mission Zero Technologies | Electrochemical direct air capture systems | $140M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Paebbl | Makes carbon-storing construction materials | $140M–$200M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $33M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | NetZero | Tropical biochar production facilities | $110M–$170M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $39M | Strong Confidence |
| 25 | Spiritus | Low-energy direct air capture | $120M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $41M | Full Confidence |
| 26 | Andes | Microbial farmland carbon mineralization | $100M–$170M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 27 | Gigablue | Microalgae-based marine carbon removal | $100M–$165M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 28 | Captura | Electrochemical ocean carbon removal | $100M–$160M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $58M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | CREW Carbon | Wastewater-based carbon dioxide removal | $100M–$150M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Full Confidence |
| 30 | Capture6 | Brine-based carbon and water recovery | $90M–$150M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $34M | Partial Confidence |
| 31 | Applied Carbon | Mobile farm biochar production | $90M–$140M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $22M | Strong Confidence |
| 32 | Vesta | Coastal olivine carbon removal | $75M–$125M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $35M | Partial Confidence |
| 33 | Greenlyte Carbon Technologies | Captures CO₂ and produces hydrogen | $80M–$120M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $20M | Full Confidence |
| 34 | Carbo Culture | Converts biomass into durable biochar | $75M–$115M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $25M | Partial Confidence |
| 35 | Ebb Carbon | Electrochemical ocean alkalinity enhancement | $75M–$105M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $23M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Mati Carbon | Smallholder rock weathering removal | $50M–$120M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 37 | Equatic | Seawater electrolysis and green hydrogen | $65M–$95M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Arca | Mineralizes CO₂ in mine tailings | $65M–$95M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $8M | Partial Confidence |
| 39 | Origen | Limestone-based carbon removal systems | $60M–$95M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $13M | Full Confidence |
| 40 | Carbonity | Industrial-scale biochar production | $60M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 41 | Carbyon | Fast-cycling direct air capture | $55M–$85M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $20M | Partial Confidence |
| 42 | UNDO Carbon | Enhanced rock weathering removal | $50M–$90M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 43 | Eion | Agricultural rock weathering removal | $40M–$90M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $15M | Partial Confidence |
| 44 | Phlair | Hydrolyzer-based direct air capture | $50M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $13M | Strong Confidence |
| 45 | Silicate Carbon | Farmland enhanced rock weathering | $45M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $2M | Partial Confidence |
| 46 | Planetary Technologies | Ocean alkalinity carbon removal | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | Travertine Technologies | Mineralizes CO₂ from industrial waste | $45M–$70M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $12M | Full Confidence |
| 48 | O.C.O Technology | Produces carbon-negative aggregates | $40M–$70M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 49 | RepAir | Electrochemical carbon capture technology | $45M–$60M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $27M | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | Myno Carbon | Industrial biochar and renewable power | $35M–$65M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 51 | Noya | Modular direct air capture | $35M–$65M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 52 | Carbofex | Manufactures industrial biochar systems | $30M–$65M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 53 | Brilliant Planet | Algae-based carbon removal ponds | $35M–$60M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Full Confidence |
| 54 | Heimdal | Renewable-powered direct air capture | $35M–$60M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Partial Confidence |
| 55 | Mote | Biomass hydrogen with carbon storage | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 56 | CarbonBlue | Water-based carbon dioxide removal | $35M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $10M | Strong Confidence |
| 57 | CarbonRun | River alkalinity carbon removal | $30M–$55M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 58 | Sustaera | Modular low-temperature carbon capture | $25M–$50M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12M | Strong Confidence |
| 59 | Husk Ventures | Biochar fertilizers from rice residues | $28M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 60 | InPlanet | Tropical enhanced rock weathering | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Full Confidence |
| 61 | Sirona Technologies | Modular direct air capture | $25M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Full Confidence |
| 62 | Skytree | Onsite modular direct air capture | $24M–$40M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 63 | Standard Biocarbon | Industrial high-carbon biochar production | $23M–$38M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 64 | Vycarb | Measured water-based carbon storage | $24M–$34M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 65 | Aircela | Converts captured CO₂ into gasoline | $20M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $6M | Partial Confidence |
| 66 | Metalplant | Nickel phytomining and carbon removal | $20M–$34M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Partial Confidence |
| 67 | NULIFE GreenTech | Biowaste geological carbon storage | $18M–$35M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | Octavia Carbon | Kenya-based direct air capture | $19M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $4M | Strong Confidence |
| 69 | Parallel Carbon | DAC plus clean hydrogen | $18M–$30M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4M | Full Confidence |
| 70 | Biochar Life | Smallholder biochar carbon removal | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Revenue or ARR Multiple Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 71 | Ucaneo | Biomimetic direct air capture | $18M–$25M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $7M | Partial Confidence |
| 72 | Rewind | Deep-sea biomass carbon storage | $15M–$25M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M | Strong Confidence |
| 73 | NeoCarbon | Cooling-tower direct air capture | $15M–$25M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $5M | Strong Confidence |
| 74 | Carboneers | Smallholder biochar carbon projects | $12M–$28M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 75 | Cella Mineral Storage | Stores CO₂ in volcanic rock | $12M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3M | Partial Confidence |
| 76 | Carboniferous | Marine anoxic biomass storage | $10M–$24M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 77 | Wakefield BioChar | Produces biochar soil products | $12M–$20M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $3M | Low Confidence |
| 78 | Kodama Systems | Automates forestry and biomass management | $12M–$18M | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $7M | Full Confidence |
| 79 | Takachar | Portable biomass upcycling equipment | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Strong Confidence |
| 80 | Seratech | Develops carbon-negative cement technology | $8M–$18M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 81 | SeaO2 | Direct ocean carbon capture | $10M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 82 | Pacific Biochar | Sells biochar products and credits | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 83 | Airhive | Fluidized-bed direct air capture | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 84 | Seafields | Sargassum farming and sequestration | $8M–$15M | Low Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 85 | InterEarth | Grown biomass underground storage | $6M–$15M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Partial Confidence |
| 86 | NEG8 Carbon | Electrostatic direct air capture | $7M–$14M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Low Confidence |
| 87 | Carbon Lockdown | Wood-vault biomass carbon storage | $5M–$13M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 88 | TerraFixing | Cold-climate direct air capture | $6M–$11M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Strong Confidence |
| 89 | Carbon Removals | Develops biomass carbon-removal projects | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 90 | Phykos | Autonomous seaweed carbon removal | $5M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 91 | Planboo | Biochar monitoring and carbon credits | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 92 | AspiraDAC | Solar-powered direct air capture | $3M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 93 | Carbon Kapture | Kelp farming for carbon removal | $3M–$7M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 94 | Carbon To Stone | Converts CO₂ into carbonates | $2M–$6M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
| 95 | BluSky Carbon | Biochar and carbon mineralization | $3M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $5M | Partial Confidence |
| 96 | Carbon Blade | Compact direct air capture systems | $1M–$4M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0M | Low Confidence |
Key valuation trends in the carbon removal market
Insights
- The top 10 carbon removal startups represent approximately 57% of the combined midpoint valuation in this ranking, showing that sector value remains concentrated among a small group of scaled platforms.
- Climeworks has a midpoint valuation of approximately $1.8B, more than 33 times the market’s median startup valuation of roughly $54M.
- Only four carbon removal companies have midpoint valuations above $1B: Climeworks, 1PointFive, Heirloom and Carbon Engineering. This leaves a large valuation gap between the market leaders and the wider startup base.
- Direct air capture companies continue to attract premium valuations, but biomass, biochar and mineralization businesses are building a credible middle tier with clearer near-term deployment pathways.
- The median valuation-to-capital-raised ratio is approximately 5.5 times among companies with disclosed funding, suggesting that investors assign significant value to technology, project pipelines and future carbon-credit capacity.
- CREW Carbon has a valuation midpoint near $125M against only $5M of disclosed funding, producing a 25 times valuation-to-funding ratio, the highest among funded companies in the ranking.
- Ocean carbon removal remains smaller than leading biomass and biochar categories. Captura, Ebb Carbon and Equatic combine for roughly $300M in midpoint valuation from approximately $93M of disclosed funding.
- Novocarbo and Applied Carbon together reach approximately $310M in midpoint valuation from $49M of disclosed capital, showing the investor appeal of deployable biochar production infrastructure.
- Greenlyte Carbon Technologies and Equatic combine carbon removal with hydrogen production. The two companies have a combined midpoint valuation near $180M against only $32M of disclosed funding.
A few word about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the carbon removal market based on their current valuation.
Estimating carbon removal startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many companies do not publicly disclose their valuation, and the available information can vary widely depending on the company, technology and development stage.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed companies, or official acquisition prices.
When a carbon removal company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a carbon removal company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
In some cases, we also estimate valuations using operating metrics such as revenue, annual recurring revenue, contracted carbon removal volume, project capacity or customer traction. We combine these metrics with valuation multiples from comparable carbon removal companies.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, project development, carbon-credit purchases or technology deployment.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older data is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because carbon removal valuation data is not always fully public, each startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This helps reflect the uncertainty and increases the probability that the true valuation falls within the estimated range.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the carbon removal market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.
Related blog posts
- The main fundraising trends in the carbon removal market
- The startups that have raised the most funding in the carbon removal market
- How healthy is startup funding in the carbon removal market right now?
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.