What are the most valued startups in the quantum computing market?
Download our beautiful pitch about the quantum computing market

In our quantum computing market deck, you will find everything you need to understand the market
The quantum computing market now includes public companies worth billions of dollars, private hardware developers, quantum software platforms, networking specialists and enabling technology startups.
This ranking tracks the most valuable companies in the sector, and we update the list every month as funding rounds, public market prices, acquisitions and new valuation signals appear.
The database combines reported valuations with structured estimates so that private and public quantum computing companies can be compared in one place.
And if you want to better understand this new industry, you can download our pitch covering the quantum computing market.
A quick summary table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Most valuable quantum computing startup | IonQ, $14.8B |
| Second most valuable quantum computing startup | Quantinuum, $12.5B |
| Median quantum computing valuation | Approximately $170M |
| Share of quantum computing valuation captured by the top 10 | Approximately 64% |
| Top quantum computing valuation vs. median | Approximately 87x |
| Median quantum valuation-to-capital-raised ratio | Approximately 4.8x |
| Quantum computing startups valued at $1B+ | 23 |

This market map, featured in our quantum computing market deck, highlights top companies and startups in the quantum computing market
Top startups in the quantum computing market ranked by valuation
Here is an updated table that ranks the top startups in the quantum computing market based on their latest reported or estimated valuations.
If you want more details about their fundraising activity, you can check our list of the startups who have raised the most funding in the quantum computing market.
For funding confidence, exact disclosed totals are classified as Full Confidence, approximate or lower-bound totals as Strong Confidence, and materially incomplete or undisclosed totals as Low Confidence.
| # | Startup Name | What They Do | Current Valuation ($) | Valuation Confidence Level | Valuation Type | Evidence Status | Total Funding ($) | Funding Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IonQ | Trapped-ion quantum computing systems | $14.8B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$1.5B | Strong Confidence |
| 2 | Quantinuum | Integrated quantum hardware and software | $12.5B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$1.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 3 | D-Wave Systems | Quantum annealing computing systems | $6.1B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$957M | Strong Confidence |
| 4 | PsiQuantum | Photonic fault-tolerant quantum computers | $4.4B–$7.0B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | ~$2.4B | Strong Confidence |
| 5 | Rigetti Computing | Superconducting quantum computers and processors | $5.0B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$934M | Strong Confidence |
| 6 | Terra Quantum | Quantum software, security and optimization | $3.5B | Strong Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Observed | ~$120M | Strong Confidence |
| 7 | Classiq | Quantum software development platform | $2.0B–$5.0B | Low Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | ~$204M | Strong Confidence |
| 8 | Oxford Quantum Circuits | Data-center superconducting quantum computers | $2.3B–$4.4B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$504M | Strong Confidence |
| 9 | Pasqal | Neutral-atom quantum computing systems | $3.3B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$539M | Strong Confidence |
| 10 | Origin Quantum | Full-stack superconducting quantum computers | $3.1B–$3.3B | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | ~$590M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 11 | Xanadu | Photonic quantum computers and software | $3.0B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$545M | Strong Confidence |
| 12 | Photonic | Distributed silicon-spin quantum computing | $2.0B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | >$350M | Strong Confidence |
| 13 | IQM Quantum Computers | Full-stack superconducting quantum computers | $2.0B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | ~$638M | Strong Confidence |
| 14 | Quantum Computing Inc. | Photonic quantum computing and chipmaking | $1.8B | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $1.5B+ | Strong Confidence |
| 15 | QuantWare | Modular superconducting quantum processors | $1.2B–$2.2B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $220M | Full Confidence |
| 16 | Nord Quantique | Bosonic quantum error-corrected computers | $1.4B | Full Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Observed | $59M | Full Confidence |
| 17 | QuEra Computing | Neutral-atom fault-tolerant quantum computers | $1.1B–$1.6B | Partial Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | ~$280M | Strong Confidence |
| 18 | SEEQC | Cryogenic quantum-control chips | $1.2B–$1.4B | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $91M | Full Confidence |
| 19 | Quantum Machines | Quantum computer control infrastructure | $1.0B–$1.5B | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$280M | Strong Confidence |
| 20 | SpinQ | Superconducting and NMR quantum computers | $1.0B–$1.5B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $257M | Full Confidence |
| 21 | Oxford Ionics | Trapped-ion quantum computers | $1.1B | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $42M | Full Confidence |
| 22 | TuringQ | Photonic quantum computing systems | $1.0B–$1.2B | Partial Confidence | IPO or Listing Range Valuation | Estimated | $140M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 23 | Atom Computing | Neutral-atom quantum computing systems | $700M–$1.3B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | >$300M | Strong Confidence |
| 24 | Quobly | Silicon quantum computer hardware | $680M–$1.1B | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $178.9M | Full Confidence |
| 25 | Quantum Motion | Silicon-spin quantum computers | $640M–$960M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $222M | Full Confidence |
| 26 | Horizon Quantum Computing | Quantum software infrastructure | $775M | Full Confidence | Public Market Cap | Observed | $33M | Full Confidence |
| 27 | Quantum Art | Multi-core trapped-ion quantum computers | $650M–$900M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $164M | Full Confidence |
| 28 | Alice & Bob | Cat-qubit fault-tolerant quantum computing | $450M–$700M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$166M | Strong Confidence |
| 29 | Quantum Circuits | Error-corrected superconducting quantum computers | $550M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $79M | Full Confidence |
| 30 | Qolab | Superconducting quantum computing hardware | $400M–$650M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$71M | Strong Confidence |
| 31 | eleQtron | Microwave-controlled trapped-ion quantum computers | $420M–$550M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $116M | Full Confidence |
| 32 | Equal1 | Silicon quantum computers and processors | $330M–$500M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $85M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 33 | Nu Quantum | Distributed quantum networking infrastructure | $300M–$500M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$86M | Strong Confidence |
| 34 | Riverlane | Quantum error-correction technology | $311M–$467M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $120M | Full Confidence |
| 35 | ORCA Computing | Room-temperature photonic quantum computers | $300M–$450M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$49M | Strong Confidence |
| 36 | Qilimanjaro Quantum Tech | Analog superconducting quantum computers | $300M–$450M | Partial Confidence | Active Raise Valuation | Implied | $18.1M | Full Confidence |
| 37 | OptQC | Room-temperature optical quantum computers | $235M–$390M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$133M | Strong Confidence |
| 38 | Lightsynq | Photonic quantum networking and memory | $307M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $18M | Full Confidence |
| 39 | Phasecraft | Quantum algorithms for industrial applications | $240M–$360M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $63.5M | Full Confidence |
| 40 | Q-CTRL | Quantum control software and sensing | $236M–$354M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $132M | Full Confidence |
| 41 | Quandela | Photonic quantum computers | $220M–$330M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $72M | Full Confidence |
| 42 | planqc | Neutral-atom quantum computers | $220M–$330M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $59M | Full Confidence |
| 43 | Qblox | Quantum control and readout hardware | $220M–$320M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $34M | Full Confidence |
| 44 | Quantum Source | Photonic fault-tolerant quantum computers | $200M–$300M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $77M | Full Confidence |
| 45 | Sparrow Quantum | Deterministic single-photon quantum chips | $170M–$250M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $35M | Full Confidence |
| 46 | Huayi Boao | Trapped-ion quantum computers and cloud | $160M–$260M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$43M | Strong Confidence |
| 47 | Quantum Computing Technology | Quantum hardware and services | $100M–$300M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not disclosed | Low Confidence |
| 48 | Qedma | Quantum error-mitigation software | $140M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $26M | Full Confidence |
| 49 | Universal Quantum | Scalable trapped-ion quantum computers | $140M–$220M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $25M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 50 | Strangeworks | Quantum and advanced computing software | $140M–$200M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $28M | Full Confidence |
| 51 | QuamCore | Million-qubit superconducting architecture | $130M–$200M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $35M | Full Confidence |
| 52 | Quantum Brilliance | Room-temperature diamond quantum computers | $120M–$180M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $49M | Full Confidence |
| 53 | QpiAI | AI and quantum enterprise computing | $125M–$155M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $38.5M | Full Confidence |
| 54 | ZuriQ | Two-dimensional trapped-ion quantum processors | $105M–$170M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$30M | Strong Confidence |
| 55 | Algorithmiq | Quantum algorithms and middleware | $110M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $42.2M | Full Confidence |
| 56 | Silicon Quantum Computing | Atomic-scale silicon quantum processors | $115M–$145M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $141M | Full Confidence |
| 57 | C12 Quantum Electronics | Carbon-nanotube quantum processors | $100M–$160M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$46M | Strong Confidence |
| 58 | QC Ware | Quantum chemistry software | $100M–$150M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $34M | Full Confidence |
| 59 | QuiX Quantum | Photonic processors and quantum computers | $90M–$150M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $23M | Full Confidence |
| 60 | SemiQon | Cryogenic silicon quantum control chips | $80M–$140M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $57M | Full Confidence |
| 61 | QunaSys | Quantum algorithms and chemistry software | $80M–$120M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $30M | Full Confidence |
| 62 | Nanofiber Quantum Technologies | Nanofiber quantum processor interconnects | $70M–$115M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$15M | Strong Confidence |
| 63 | Orange Quantum Systems | Automated quantum-chip testing systems | $70M–$100M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $19M | Full Confidence |
| 64 | QphoX | Optical links for quantum processors | $60M–$110M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $22.6M | Full Confidence |
| 65 | Kiutra | Cryogenic cooling for quantum systems | $65M–$100M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $35M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 66 | Quanscient | Quantum-powered multiphysics simulation software | $60M–$95M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$21M | Strong Confidence |
| 67 | 1QBit | Quantum and quantum-inspired software | $55M–$100M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$38M | Strong Confidence |
| 68 | Delft Circuits | Cryogenic quantum interconnect hardware | $60M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $16M | Full Confidence |
| 69 | Diraq | Silicon-spin quantum computers | $55M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $69M | Full Confidence |
| 70 | EeroQ | Electron-on-helium quantum processors | $45M–$90M | Partial Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $11M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 71 | QuantrolOx | Automated qubit control software | $58M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Announced Private Round Valuation | Estimated | $23.4M | Full Confidence |
| 72 | Kipu Quantum | Hardware-specific quantum algorithms | $50M–$75M | Low Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $14.5M | Full Confidence |
| 73 | BlueQubit | Quantum software and simulation platform | $50M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Estimated | $13M | Full Confidence |
| 74 | Pixel Photonics | Integrated superconducting photon detectors | $45M–$80M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $18.8M | Full Confidence |
| 75 | Anyon Systems | Superconducting quantum computing systems | $40M–$80M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $17M | Full Confidence |
| 76 | Atlantic Quantum | Scalable superconducting quantum hardware | $40M–$80M | Low Confidence | Acquisition Value | Estimated | ~$11M | Strong Confidence |
| 77 | Haiqu | Quantum application operating system | $45M–$75M | Partial Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | $15.1M | Full Confidence |
| 78 | Groove Quantum | Germanium semiconductor spin qubits | $45M–$70M | Strong Confidence | Implied Valuation from Raise | Implied | ~$19M | Strong Confidence |
| 79 | BQP | Quantum-accelerated engineering simulation software | $35M–$60M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $8M | Full Confidence |
| 80 | ParityQC | Quantum architecture and compiler technology | $25M–$45M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $3.2M | Full Confidence |
| 81 | Entropica Labs | Quantum error-correction software | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $7M | Full Confidence |
| 82 | TreQ | Open-architecture quantum computing systems | $25M–$45M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $5M+ | Strong Confidence |
| 83 | qBraid | Quantum cloud developer platform | $25M–$40M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0.35M+ disclosed | Low Confidence |
| 84 | Aegiq | Photonic quantum computing and networking | $25M–$38M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $12.4M | Full Confidence |
| 85 | QPerfect | Quantum emulation and digital twins | $24M–$31M | Strong Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $0.11M | Full Confidence |
| 86 | Qruise | Quantum calibration and control software | $15M–$30M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2.7M | Full Confidence |
| 87 | Quantagonia | Hybrid optimization and quantum software | $15M–$25M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4.7M | Full Confidence |
| 88 | Quantum Rings | Quantum computing software and simulation | $10M–$22M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $50K+ | Low Confidence |
| 89 | Bleximo | Application-specific superconducting quantum processors | $8M–$20M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$3M | Strong Confidence |
| 90 | Arctic Instruments | Quantum microwave readout amplifiers | $10M–$18M | Strong Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2.7M | Full Confidence |
| 91 | Qubic Technologies | Quantum microwave sensing hardware | $10M–$15M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$3M | Strong Confidence |
| 92 | Quanfluence | Photonic quantum computing hardware | $8M–$14M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $2M | Full Confidence |
| 93 | Rotonium | Photonic quantum processor technology | $9M–$13M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $1M | Full Confidence |
| 94 | SilQ Connect | Modular quantum processor interconnects | $7M–$14M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Undisclosed | Low Confidence |
| 95 | Menten AI | AI-designed peptide therapeutics | $4M–$10M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | $4.2M | Full Confidence |
| 96 | SoftQuantus | Quantum infrastructure orchestration software | $4M–$8M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | ~$0.8M | Strong Confidence |
| 97 | Molecular Quantum Solutions | Quantum chemistry simulation software | $3M–$6M | Partial Confidence | Comparables-Based Estimate | Estimated | $0.7M | Full Confidence |
| 98 | Quantistry | Quantum-enabled materials simulation software | $2M | Full Confidence | Acquisition Value | Observed | $3M | Full Confidence |
| 99 | Anaqor | Quantum application marketplace platform | $0M–$2M | Low Confidence | Proxy-Based Estimate | Estimated | Not disclosed | Low Confidence |

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, compares the 2026 size of the quantum computing market with other markets of similar size
Key valuation trends in the quantum computing market
Insights
- Quantum computing valuations are highly concentrated. The top 10 companies represent about 64% of the roughly $95B combined valuation represented by the full ranking, using valuation midpoints for companies reported as ranges.
- IonQ and Quantinuum alone are worth $27.3B, or almost 29% of the value across the entire quantum computing ranking. The two companies also represent about 45% of the top 10's combined value.
- The sector has developed a substantial billion-dollar tier. Twenty-three quantum computing companies have valuations or valuation midpoints of at least $1B, while the median company in the full database is valued at only about $170M.
- Capital efficiency varies sharply between quantum startups. Oxford Ionics reached a $1.1B acquisition value after raising only $42M, while Nord Quantique's $1.4B valuation is almost 24 times its $59M funding base.
- Quantum networking and error correction are becoming valuable categories in their own right. Lightsynq reached a $307M acquisition value, while Riverlane has a valuation midpoint near $389M without building a general-purpose quantum computer.
- Strategic acquisitions can produce large outcomes before companies raise enormous amounts of capital. Oxford Ionics, Quantum Circuits and Lightsynq generated about $2.0B of combined transaction value after raising only $139M in total.
- The distance between the leaders and the typical quantum startup remains extreme. IonQ's $14.8B valuation is roughly 87 times the approximately $170M median valuation across the database.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, looks at IonQ’s strategy in quantum computing
A few words about our methodology
As you can see, we built a database that ranks startups in the quantum computing market based on their current valuation.
Estimating quantum computing startup valuations is not always straightforward. Many private quantum companies do not publicly disclose a valuation, and the available evidence varies significantly between companies.
To build this ranking, we applied a structured valuation methodology and cross-checked information across multiple reliable sources.
Whenever possible, we relied on direct disclosures. These include announced valuations from completed funding rounds, public filings for listed quantum companies, and official acquisition prices.
When a quantum computing company is publicly listed, we use its current market capitalization as the reference valuation.
If a quantum computing company was acquired and no independent valuation can reasonably be estimated today, we use the acquisition price as the main reference point.
When a startup recently raised capital but the valuation was not disclosed, we estimate the implied valuation using typical dilution levels for that stage of fundraising.
For quantum hardware companies, we also consider factors such as architecture, qubit modality, technical milestones, commercial contracts, manufacturing progress and the capital required to reach the next development stage.
For quantum software, control, networking and infrastructure companies, we may consider revenue, customer adoption, strategic partnerships and comparable transactions when enough information is available.
When direct financial data is not available, we may rely on carefully selected comparable quantum startups and other signals such as hiring growth, investor quality, product traction and technical progress.
All estimates follow a strict evidence hierarchy. Recent funding rounds with announced valuations carry the most weight, followed by public market data, acquisition values, strong operating metrics and comparable company analysis.
We also carefully evaluate the age of every data point. Recent information carries more weight, while older information is treated cautiously and adjusted conservatively when necessary.
Whenever information is uncertain or incomplete, we clearly distinguish between confirmed facts and reasonable inferences.
Because valuation data is not always fully public, each quantum computing startup in the ranking is assigned a confidence level based on the reliability, recency and consistency of the available evidence.
Full confidence means the valuation is supported by strong and recent evidence. Strong confidence means the estimate is well supported but includes minor inference. Partial confidence means the estimate relies more heavily on indirect signals. Low confidence means available information is limited or inconsistent.
When confidence is lower, we take a more conservative approach by widening the valuation range. This reflects the uncertainty and increases the probability that the real valuation falls within the estimated range.
Funding confidence is assessed separately. Exact disclosed funding totals receive the strongest treatment, while approximate totals, lower bounds and incomplete disclosures are marked more cautiously.
For summary statistics, we use the midpoint of a valuation range when a company does not have a single valuation figure. This makes it possible to calculate metrics such as median valuation, top 10 concentration and valuation-to-funding ratios consistently across the database.
This reflects how we conduct all our research, including the work behind our report covering the quantum computing market.
In a world where LLMs hallucinate and unreliable information is everywhere, our goal is simple: provide data you can trust.
If you want the full detail on a specific valuation estimate, feel free to contact us and we will gladly explain.
Finally, know that we update the dataset once per month, so come back here if you need fresh information.

This chart, included in our quantum computing market deck, illustrates yearly funding for quantum computing startups
Related blog posts
- The startups that have raised the most funding in quantum computing
Who is the author of this content?
NEW MARKET PITCH TEAM
We track new markets so founders and investors can move fasterWe build living “market pitch” documents for emerging markets: from AI to synthetic biology and new proteins. Instead of digging through outdated PDFs, random blog posts, and hallucinated LLM answers, our clients get a clean, visual, always-updated view of what’s really happening. We map the key players, deals, regulations, metrics and signals that matter so you can decide faster whether a market is worth your time. Want to know more? Check out our about page. You can also follow us on Instagram or on Facebook.
How we created this content 🔎📝
At New Market Pitch, we kept seeing the same problem: when you look at a new market, the data is either missing, paywalled, or buried in 300-page reports that feel like they were written in the 80s. On the other side, LLMs and random blog posts give you confident answers with no sources, and sometimes they just make things up. That’s not good enough when you’re about to invest real money or launch a company.
So we decided to fix the experience. For each market we cover, we build a structured database and update it on a regular basis. We track funding rounds, fund memos, M&A moves, partnerships, new products, policy changes, and the real activity of startups and incumbents. Then we turn all of that into a clear “market pitch” that shows where the opportunities are and how people actually win in that space.
Every key data point is checked, sourced, and put back into context by our team. That’s how we can give you both speed and reliability: fast coverage of new markets, without the usual guesswork.