What are the most valuable AI trust, risk and security startups?

Whether you're building or investing in the AI TRiSM market, our report covers everything you need to know: the players, the money, and what's coming next.
Summary
Arena is the most valuable AI TRiSM startup we track, valued at $3.1B. Zenity follows at $833M–$1.6B, while HiddenLayer sits at $667M–$1.2B, so Arena is still far ahead of everyone else.
That gap is striking because this is still a young category. Only 1 of the 176 startups we track is certainly worth $1B or more across its full valuation range, while 174 sit below $1B even at the middle of their range.
Look at the companies nearest the top and a pattern appears quickly. Arena evaluates frontier models and agents, Zenity secures agents, HiddenLayer protects enterprise AI systems, and Braintrust handles evaluation and production monitoring.
Agent security has the deepest cluster of large valuations right now. Onyx Security is reportedly valued at $640M, we estimate Neo Security at $400M–$800M, and WitnessAI's last round puts it at $387M–$725M.
Evaluation can also support very large companies. Braintrust carries an announced $800M valuation, while Patronus AI is valued at $333M–$625M based on our estimate from the size of its June 2026 Series B.
The leaders mostly sit where AI moves from a demo into real company systems. They control agent permissions, runtime behavior, red teaming, evaluation, data use or deploy-or-block decisions.
Recent financing fits that picture. Zenity raised $125M to expand agent security, HiddenLayer raised $100M for AI and agent protection, and Onyx Security raised $113M while saying revenue had quadrupled since its stealth launch.
Most of the leaders are American, from Arena to HiddenLayer and Braintrust. Yet Israel places Zenity, Alice and Onyx Security near the very top.
Private-market pricing is messy, though. Most of these companies have never published a valuation, so a range is often the honest answer.
The clearest conclusion today is that AI TRiSM already has one multi-billion-dollar leader and a crowded second tier. Security, evaluation and runtime control are getting serious prices, but this is still far from a market full of proven unicorns.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us

In our report covering the AI TRiSM market, we turn what is vague and complex into simple, useful visuals. Market maps like this one show you at a glance where every startup stands.
Top startups in the AI TRiSM market ranked by valuation
Here is the current ranking of the most valuable AI TRiSM startups. For each one you will also find our confidence level and the valuation basis we used.
If you want to go deeper into the AI TRiSM startup landscape, check our report covering the AI TRiSM market.
| # | Startup | Valuation | Confidence | Valuation basis | Last round | Total funding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private startups | ||||||
| 1 | ArenaIndependently evaluates frontier models and AI agents for alignment, unauthorized actions, deception and real-world risks. | $3.1Bas of Oct 2026 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $200MSeries B · Oct 2026 | $450Mvalued at 6.9× this |
| 2 | ZenityAI agent security and governance | $833M–$1.6Bas of Aug 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $125MSeries C · Aug 2026 | $184Mvalued at 6.5× this |
| 3 | HiddenLayerProtects enterprise AI models and agents | $667M–$1.2Bas of Sep 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $100MSeries B · Sep 2026 | $156Mvalued at 6.1× this |
| 4 | BraintrustAI agent evaluation and production monitoring | $800M | Full | Announced private round valuation | $80MSeries B · Feb 2026 | $124Mvalued at 6.4× this |
| 5 | AliceAI safety and threat prevention | $700M–$800Mas of Aug 2026 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $140MEquity round · Aug 2026 | $240Mvalued at 3.1× this |
| 6 | Onyx SecurityEnterprise AI agent security controls | $640Mas of Jul 2026 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $113MSeries B · Jul 2026 | $153Mvalued at 4.2× this |
| 7 | Neo SecurityEnterprise agentic software security | $400M–$800Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $75M+Growth equity · Jul 2026 | $100M+valued at 6.0× this |
| 8 | WitnessAI1Enterprise AI security and monitoring | $387M–$725Mas of Jan 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $58MSeries B · Jan 2026 | $86Mvalued at 6.5× this |
| 9 | Patronus AIAI evaluation and simulation infrastructure | $333M–$625Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $50MSeries B · Jun 2026 | $70Mvalued at 6.8× this |
| 10 | Harmonic SecuritySecures enterprise AI usage and data | $333M–$625Mas of Oct 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $50MSeries B · Oct 2026 | $74Mvalued at 6.4× this |
| 11 | IrregularFrontier AI security testing | $450Mas of Sep 2025 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $80MSeed and Series A financing · Sep 2025 | $80Mvalued at 5.6× this |
| 12 | StraikerAI agent threat detection and protection | $320M–$533Mas of Jun 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $64MSeries A · Jun 2026 | $85Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 13 | White CircleReal-time AI safety and control | $280M–$530Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $11MSeed · May 2026 | $11Mvalued at 36.8× this |
| 14 | Noma SecurityAI application and agent security | $400Mas of Jul 2025 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $100MSeries B · Jul 2025 | $132M+valued at 3.0× this |
| 15 | Arcade.devTool-calling infrastructure for AI agents | $300M–$500Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | UndisclosedSeries A extension · Sep 2026 | $72M+valued at 5.6× this |
| 16 | Relyance AIAI-specific data governance and compliance controls | $214M–$401Mas of Oct 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $32MSeries B · Oct 2024 | $32M+valued at 9.6× this |
| 17 | Fiddler AIAI observability, security and governance | $200M–$375Mas of Jan 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $30MSeries C · Jan 2026 | $94Mvalued at 3.1× this |
| 18 | AIUCAI safety standards and insurance | $200M–$333Mas of Sep 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $40MSeries A · Sep 2026 | $55Mvalued at 4.8× this |
| 19 | AIR SecuritySecures autonomous AI agent ecosystems | $200M–$330Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $40MSeed · Aug 2026 | $50Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 20 | AurascapeControls enterprise AI security risks | $186M–$310Mas of Apr 2025 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $37MSeries A · Apr 2025 | $50Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 21 | BayProvides enterprise AI-agent discovery, session-level observability, adaptive guardrails and real-time action enforcement across endpoints, cloud and SaaS. | $185M–$308Mas of Nov 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $37MSeries A · Nov 2026 | $50Mvalued at 4.9× this |
| 22 | Pluto SecurityEnterprise AI usage security | $170M–$320Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | ~$34MSeries A · Oct 2026 | $42Mvalued at 5.8× this |
| 23 | RaindropAI agent observability and issue detection | $175M–$292Mas of Sep 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $35MSeries A · Sep 2026 | $50Mvalued at 4.7× this |
| 24 | Gray SwanAI red teaming and runtime defense | $200Mas of Jun 2026 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $40MSeries A · May 2026 | $46Mvalued at 4.4× this |
| 25 | MindgardAutomated adversarial AI security testing | $150M–$250Mas of Aug 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $30MSeries A · Aug 2026 | $42Mvalued at 4.8× this |
| 26 | RunlayerEnterprise AI agent access governance | $150M–$250Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $30MSeries A · Jun 2026 | $41Mvalued at 4.9× this |
| 27 | Lasso Security1Enterprise AI security and guardrails | $150M–$250Mas of Sep 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $30MSeries A · Sep 2026 | $36Mvalued at 5.6× this |
| 28 | Hush SecuritySecures machine identities and AI agents | $150M–$250Mas of Jul 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $30MSeries A · Jul 2026 | $41Mvalued at 4.9× this |
| 29 | Arthur AIMonitors and secures AI models | $120M–$260Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $42MSeries B · Jun 2022 | $60Mvalued at 3.2× this |
| 30 | Cranium AI2Enterprise AI security and governance | $115M–$265Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $20MEquity Offering · Jul 2026 | $52Mvalued at 3.7× this |
| 31 | CovalTests and evaluates AI agents | $140M–$233Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $28MSeries A · Jun 2026 | $31Mvalued at 6.0× this |
| 32 | JetStream SecurityEnterprise AI governance and visibility | $136M–$227Mas of Mar 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $34MSeed · Mar 2026 | $34Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 33 | Geordie AIAI agent security and governance | $180Mas of May 2026 | Full | Announced private round valuation | $30MSeries A · May 2026 | $36Mvalued at 4.9× this |
| 34 | Rein SecurityRuntime security for AI agents | $125M–$208Mas of Oct 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $25MSeries A · Oct 2026 | $33Mvalued at 5.1× this |
| 35 | KeycardIdentity and permissions for AI agents | $115M–$205Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $30MSeries A · Oct 2025 | $38Mvalued at 4.2× this |
| 36 | Pramaana LabsFormal verification for AI reliability | $108M–$180M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $27MSeed · Jun 2026 | $27Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 37 | KindoEnterprise AI agent management platform | $103M–$172Mas of Jul 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $21MSeries A · Jul 2024 | $21Mvalued at 6.7× this |
| 38 | WhiteMatterSecures and governs enterprise AI agents, models and MCP servers from pre-production validation through policy enforcement and runtime control. | $100M–$167Mas of Nov 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $20MSeries A · Nov 2026 | $20Mvalued at 6.7× this |
| 39 | Backslash SecuritySecurity platform for AI agents | $95M–$158Mas of Feb 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $19MSeries A · Feb 2026 | $27Mvalued at 4.7× this |
| 40 | DistributionalAI testing and reliability evaluation platform | $95M–$158Mas of Oct 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $19MSeries A · Oct 2024 | $19Mvalued at 6.7× this |
| 41 | Resect AIRuntime AI hallucination detection and auditing | $85M–$165M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $25MOther · Sep 2026 | $25Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 42 | PromptfooAI application testing and red teaming | $92M–$153Mas of Jul 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $18MSeries A · Jul 2025 | $23Mvalued at 5.2× this |
| 43 | OpsinAI agent risk and access protection | $85M–$145Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $21MVenture round · Oct 2026 | $28Mvalued at 4.1× this |
| 44 | VijilAI agent resilience and validation | $85M–$142Mas of Nov 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $17MSeries A · Nov 2025 | $23Mvalued at 4.9× this |
| 45 | NeuralTrust1AI agent security and monitoring | $80M–$133Mas of Jun 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $20MSeed · Jun 2026 | $20M+valued at 5.3× this |
| 46 | AttestableCryptographically verifies AI model integrity | $80M–$133Mas of Aug 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $20MSeed · Aug 2026 | $38Mvalued at 2.8× this |
| 47 | Credo AIEnterprise AI governance and compliance | $101Mas of Jul 2024 | Strong | Reported private round valuation | $21MLate VC · Jul 2024 | $39M+valued at 2.6× this |
| 48 | OpenlayerEnterprise AI evaluation and governance | $72M–$121Mas of May 2025 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $14MSeries A · May 2025 | $19Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 49 | Lumia SecurityAI usage governance and protection | $72M–$120M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $18MSeed · Dec 2025 | $18Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 50 | Holistic AIEnterprise AI governance and compliance | $35M–$145Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $745KVenture round · Mar 2024 | $745Kvalued at 121× this |
| 51 | OuterlimitAI agent authorization infrastructure | $64M–$107M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $16MPre-Seed · Sep 2026 | $16Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 52 | LatticeFlow AIAI evaluations and risk governance | $44M–$120Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $12MSeries A · Oct 2022 | $15Mvalued at 5.5× this |
| 53 | Dreadnode1Offensive AI security testing platforms | $65M–$95M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $14MSeries A · Feb 2025 | $14M+valued at 5.7× this |
| 54 | FairPlay AIAI fairness for financial decisions | $32M–$125Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $10MSeries B · Feb 2025 | $24M+valued at 3.2× this |
| 55 | DeepKeep3Protects AI models against attacks | $42M–$115Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $10MSeed · May 2024 | $10M+valued at 7.8× this |
| 56 | Darwin AIAI governance for government agencies | $60M–$90M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $15MSeries A · Oct 2025 | $20Mvalued at 3.8× this |
| 57 | Dome SystemsGovernance platform for enterprise AI agents | $56M–$93Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $14MSeed · Apr 2026 | $14Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 58 | Barndoor AISecurity controls for enterprise AI agents | $54M–$91Mas of May 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $14MSeed · May 2025 | $14Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 59 | Portal26Enterprise AI governance and visibility | $55M–$90M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $9MSeries A · Nov 2025 | $15Mvalued at 4.8× this |
| 60 | Trent AIAI security engineer for code infrastructure | $52M–$87Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $13MSeed · Apr 2026 | $13Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 61 | Trustwise AIGenerative AI governance and safety | $32M–$105Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4MSeed · Jun 2024 | $4Mvalued at 17.1× this |
| 62 | Operant AIRuntime security for cloud AI applications and APIs | $50M–$83Mas of Sep 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $10MSeries A · Sep 2024 | $10Mvalued at 6.7× this |
| 63 | KnosticPrevents enterprise AI data oversharing | $30M–$100Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $11MSeed · Mar 2025 | $14Mvalued at 4.5× this |
| 64 | Rig SecurityIdentity protection for autonomous agents | $48M–$80M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $12MSeed · Sep 2026 | $12Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 65 | Dynamo AIEnterprise AI security and guardrails | $25M–$95Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $15MSeries A · Aug 2023 | $19Mvalued at 3.1× this |
| 66 | Singulr AIEnterprise AI security control platform | $25M–$95Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $10MSeed · Feb 2025 | $10Mvalued at 6.0× this |
| 67 | ModelOpEnterprise AI model governance | $30M–$90Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $10MSeries B · Aug 2024 | $10M+valued at 6.0× this |
| 68 | ModulosAI regulatory compliance automation | $44M–$75Mas of Jul 2025 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $10MPre-Series A · Jul 2025 | $10Mvalued at 5.9× this |
| 69 | PeridotAI oversight and governance software | $34M–$85Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8.5MApr 2026 | $8.5Mvalued at 7.0× this |
| 70 | AratoSimulates users to test AI | $40M–$67Mas of Jun 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $10MSeed · Jun 2026 | $10Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 71 | General AnalysisAdversarial testing for enterprise agents | $40M–$67Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $10MSeed · Apr 2026 | $10M+valued at 5.3× this |
| 72 | ArchestraSecurity infrastructure for enterprise AI agents | $40M–$67Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $10MSeed · Jun 2026 | $13Mvalued at 4.0× this |
| 73 | AIM IntelligenceAI security red teaming and runtime controls | $28M–$75Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | ~$7MSeries A · Apr 2026 | $8.3Mvalued at 6.2× this |
| 74 | Polygraf AIAI security and governance platform | $38M–$63Mas of Oct 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $9.5MSeed · Oct 2025 | $9.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 75 | LanaiEnterprise AI observability and protection | $35M–$65M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $10MSeed · Jan 2025 | $10Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 76 | Pillar SecurityAI application lifecycle security | $25M–$75Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $13MSeed · May 2026 | $22M+valued at 2.3× this |
| 77 | ZeroDriftPolicy enforcement runtime for AI systems | $40M–$60M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $10MSeed · Jun 2026 | $10Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 78 | ValidMindAutomated AI model risk management | $20M–$78Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $8.1MSeed · Mar 2024 | $8.1Mvalued at 6.0× this |
| 79 | Helmet SecuritySecures AI agent communications | $36M–$60Mas of Nov 2025 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $9MSeed · Dec 2025 | $9Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 80 | IridiusCompliance-by-design AI for pharma regulatory workflows | $34M–$57Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8.6MSeed · Apr 2026 | $8.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 81 | NaaiaAI governance and regulatory compliance | $20M–$70Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | ~$6.8MSeries A · Jul 2026 | $6.8Mvalued at 6.6× this |
| 82 | 2021.AIAI governance and compliance software | $30M–$60M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4.1MBridge · Aug 2024 | $4.1Mvalued at 10.9× this |
| 83 | MonitaurRegulated AI model governance | $20M–$70Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $6MSeries A · May 2024 | $13Mvalued at 3.4× this |
| 84 | Nava LabsVerification guardrails for AI financial agents | $33M–$55Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8.3MSeed · Apr 2026 | $8.3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 85 | Arrakis SecuritySecurity testing and monitoring for AI systems | $32M–$53Mas of Aug 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8MSeed · Aug 2026 | $8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 86 | HirundoMachine unlearning tools for AI models | $32M–$53Mas of Jun 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8MSeed · Jun 2025 | $8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 87 | Manifold SecurityRuntime security for autonomous AI agents | $32M–$53Mas of Mar 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $8MSeed · Mar 2026 | $8M+valued at 5.3× this |
| 88 | Crux LabsEvaluates and monitors enterprise AI-agent behavior against expert judgment across production interactions. | $24M–$60Mas of Oct 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $6M+Oct 2026 | $6M+valued at 7.0× this |
| 89 | Verax AIShadow AI discovery and usage policy enforcement | $30M–$51Mas of Oct 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $7.6MSeed · Oct 2024 | $7.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 90 | Guardrails AILLM validation monitoring and guardrails | $30M–$50Mas of Feb 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $7.5MSeed · Feb 2024 | $7.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 91 | RedactiveSecure enterprise generative AI platform | $30M–$50Mas of Jul 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $7.5MSeed · Jul 2024 | $7.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 92 | BelticVerifies and authorizes autonomous agents | $29M–$49M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $7.3MSeed · Sep 2026 | $8.8Mvalued at 4.4× this |
| 93 | Alinia AICompliance guardrails for enterprise AI | $30M–$45M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $7.5MSeed · Dec 2025 | $9.9Mvalued at 3.8× this |
| 94 | Capsule SecurityAI security testing and runtime protection | $28M–$47Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $7MSeed · Apr 2026 | $7Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 95 | MintiveGoverns enterprise AI-agent identities, permitted tools, model access and auditable actions through security gateways. | $28M–$47Mas of Oct 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $7MSeed · Oct 2026 | $7Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 96 | WillowAI agent identity and permissions | $28M–$43M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $7MSeed · Jun 2026 | $7M+valued at 5.1× this |
| 97 | Eve SecurityRuntime protection for autonomous agents | $20M–$50Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4.5MSeed extension · Sep 2026 | $7.5Mvalued at 4.7× this |
| 98 | LuminosAIAI agent evaluation and testing | $22M–$48M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $6MSeed · Feb 2026 | $6M+valued at 5.8× this |
| 99 | ALIGNMT AIAI model governance for healthcare systems | $26M–$43Mas of Aug 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $6.5MSeed · Aug 2025 | $6.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 100 | ChatSee.aiAI agent observability and governance software | $26M–$43Mas of Jun 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $6.5MSeed · Jun 2026 | $6.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 101 | Liminal SecuritySecure enterprise generative AI adoption | $25M–$40M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4MVenture round · Nov 2025 | $9M+valued at 3.6× this |
| 102 | VelatirAI governance and usage control platform | $25M–$40M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $5.8MSeed · Aug 2026 | $7.2Mvalued at 4.5× this |
| 103 | Tenet SecurityAI security posture and risk management | $24M–$40M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $6MSeed · Jun 2026 | $6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 104 | TrustibleEnterprise AI governance and compliance | $12M–$48Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4.6MSeries Seed · Jun 2025 | $6.2Mvalued at 4.8× this |
| 105 | HoneyHiveAI agent observability and evaluation | $22M–$37Mas of Apr 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $5.5MSeed · Apr 2025 | $7.4Mvalued at 4.0× this |
| 106 | AI ScoreReal-time enterprise AI governance | $22M–$36M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $5.4MSeed · Sep 2026 | $6.4Mvalued at 4.5× this |
| 107 | GiskardAI model testing and red teaming | $12M–$45Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $5MFeb 2025 | $6.7M+valued at 4.3× this |
| 108 | YieldsAutomated model validation and governance | $21M–$35M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | ~$5.2MVenture · Jun 2023 | $6.7M+valued at 4.2× this |
| 109 | Safe IntelligenceAI evaluation and model safety testing | $21M–$35Mas of Feb 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$5.2MSeed · Feb 2025 | $5.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 110 | EnzaiEnterprise AI governance and oversight | $12M–$42Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4MSeed · Sep 2023 | $4M+valued at 6.8× this |
| 111 | OpenBox AIAI model governance and security testing | $20M–$33Mas of Mar 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $5MSeed · Mar 2026 | $5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 112 | RespanOpen-source AI gateway with observability | $20M–$33Mas of Mar 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $5MSeed · Mar 2026 | $5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 113 | CodeIntegrityRuntime security controls for AI agents | $20M–$33Mas of May 2026 | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $5MSeed · May 2026 | $5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 114 | RippletideAI governance and model risk platform | $19M–$31Mas of Sep 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$4.7MSeed · Sep 2025 | $4.7Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 115 | Calvin RiskAutomated AI risk assessment | $12M–$38Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4MSeed · Nov 2024 | $5.5Mvalued at 4.5× this |
| 116 | Armilla AIAI risk assessment and insurance | $18M–$30M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4.5MSeed · Feb 2024 | $6Mvalued at 4.0× this |
| 117 | Modicus PrimeAI compliance management for pharmaceutical companies | $18M–$30M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $4.5MSeed · May 2026 | $8M+valued at 3.0× this |
| 118 | Citadel AIContinuous model reliability monitoring and testing | $18M–$29Mas of Jul 2023 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.5MSeries A · Jul 2023 | $4.2Mvalued at 5.6× this |
| 119 | DeeployAI governance and monitoring | $15M–$30M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | UndisclosedSeed · Jun 2023 | $1.1Mvalued at 19.7× this |
| 120 | Confident SecurityPrivate AI inference infrastructure | $17M–$28Mas of Jul 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4.2MSeed · Jul 2025 | $4.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 121 | KontextRuntime security for autonomous agents | $16M–$27Mas of Sep 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Sep 2026 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 122 | BluejayTesting and monitoring for AI agents | $16M–$27Mas of Aug 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Aug 2025 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 123 | Evoke SecuritySecurity testing and controls for AI systems | $16M–$27Mas of Feb 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Feb 2026 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 124 | SolidCore.aiLLM application governance and monitoring | $16M–$27Mas of Sep 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Sep 2025 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 125 | Truth SystemsAI governance controls for law firms | $16M–$27Mas of Oct 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Oct 2025 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 126 | UnboundSecurity broker for AI coding agents | $16M–$27Mas of May 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · May 2025 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 127 | Wald.aiSecure enterprise generative AI workspace | $16M–$27Mas of Dec 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $4MSeed · Dec 2024 | $4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 128 | JozuSecure AI application lifecycle orchestration | $14M–$28M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $4MSeed · May 2025 | $4Mvalued at 5.2× this |
| 129 | Prediction Guard1Private enterprise AI deployment | $15M–$27M | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | $3.7MSeed · May 2025 | $3.7Mvalued at 5.7× this |
| 130 | CertivAssurance and security for endpoint AI agents | $17M–$25M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $4.2MPre-Seed · Mar 2026 | $4.2Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 131 | Hamming AITesting and monitoring for voice agents | $15M–$25Mas of Dec 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.8MSeed · Dec 2024 | $3.9Mvalued at 5.2× this |
| 132 | AIQURISAI risk and lifecycle management platform | $15M–$25Mas of Dec 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$3.8MSeed · Dec 2024 | $3.8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 133 | ScorecardAI evaluation and testing for applications | $15M–$25Mas of Sep 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.8MSeed · Sep 2025 | $3.8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 134 | SecludySynthetic datasets for privacy sensitive AI training | $16M–$24M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $4MSeed · May 2026 | $4Mvalued at 5.0× this |
| 135 | FriskAIAI agent trace monitoring and debugging | $14M–$24Mas of Aug 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.6MPre-Seed · Aug 2026 | $3.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 136 | AsenionEnterprise AI governance and assurance | $8M–$30Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | UndisclosedSeed · 2026 | Undisclosed |
| 137 | QualifireReal-time AI output safeguards | $12M–$24M | Partial | Proxy-based estimate | Undisclosed | |
| 138 | QuantPiAutomated AI model risk assessment | $12M–$24M | Partial | Proxy-based estimate | ~$2.5MPre-Seed · Oct 2022 | $2.5Mvalued at 7.2× this |
| 139 | GalteaAI model testing and governance platform | $13M–$21Mas of Mar 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.2MSeed · Mar 2026 | $3.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 140 | TynapseRuntime guardrails and auditing for AI agents | $13M–$21Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3.2MSeed · Apr 2026 | $3.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 141 | CopySightAI copyright and content protection | $12M–$20Mas of Jul 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3MSeed · Jul 2026 | $3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 142 | LaminarObservability and evaluation tools for AI applications | $12M–$20Mas of Mar 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3MSeed · Mar 2026 | $3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 143 | Maxim AIEnterprise AI gateway and governance platform | $12M–$20Mas of Jun 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3MSeed · Jun 2024 | $3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 144 | TrismikAI model evaluation and comparison software | $12M–$20Mas of Sep 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $3MPre-Seed · Sep 2025 | $3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 145 | SaidotResponsible AI governance and compliance | $7M–$24Mas of Nov 2026 | Partial | Comparables-based estimate | ~$1.6MSeed · Oct 2023 | $1.6Mvalued at 9.7× this |
| 146 | ScorableAutomated testing and monitoring for AI | $11M–$19Mas of Sep 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.8MSeed · Sep 2024 | $2.8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 147 | OvermindTraining platform for specialized agent models | $11M–$18Mas of Feb 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$2.7MSeed · Feb 2026 | $2.7Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 148 | AigentsphereGovernance and management for enterprise AI agents | $10M–$17Mas of Apr 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$2.6MSeed · Apr 2026 | $2.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 149 | CipheroAI safety and security software | $10M–$17Mas of Dec 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.5MSeed · Dec 2025 | $2.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 150 | Mirror SecurityAI model security and data protection | $10M–$17Mas of Dec 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.5MSeed · Dec 2025 | $2.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 151 | Enkrypt AISecurity and governance for generative AI | $9.4M–$16Mas of Feb 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.4MSeed · Feb 2024 | $2.4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 152 | AIMon LabsAI hallucination detection and monitoring | $9.2M–$15Mas of Dec 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.3MPre-Seed · Dec 2024 | $2.3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 153 | LemmaAI agent monitoring and testing | $9.2M–$15Mas of Aug 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.3MSeed · Aug 2026 | $2.3Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 154 | SolasAIAI fairness and bias testing | $7M–$17M | Partial | Revenue or ARR multiple estimate | Undisclosed | |
| 155 | Principled IntelligenceAI governance and model risk management | $8.8M–$15Mas of Jan 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$2.2MSeed · Jan 2026 | $2.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 156 | Wodan AIEncrypted AI computation on private data | $8.8M–$15Mas of Dec 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.2MPre-Seed · Dec 2025 | $2.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 157 | ZioSecAI agent penetration testing and defense | $8.4M–$14Mas of Jul 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2.1MSeed · Jul 2025 | $2.1Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 158 | StarseerAI model governance and security platform | $8M–$13Mas of Jul 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $2MSeed · Jul 2025 | $2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 159 | eRoun&CompanyAI model security and governance software | $5.6M–$14Mas of Oct 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.4MOct 2025 | $1.4Mvalued at 7.0× this |
| 160 | Palma.aiSecurity controls for enterprise AI usage | $7.2M–$12Mas of Sep 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.8MPre-Seed · Sep 2026 | $1.8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 161 | SkyldProtection and licensing for AI models | $7M–$12Mas of Oct 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$1.8MSeed · Oct 2025 | $1.8Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 162 | DAIKIAI governance and compliance management software | $6.5M–$11Mas of Oct 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$1.6MSeed · Oct 2024 | $1.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 163 | Future AGIAI model evaluation and reliability platform | $6.4M–$11Mas of Feb 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.6MPre-Seed · Feb 2025 | $1.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 164 | Verno LabsOffensive security testing for AI agents | $6.4M–$11Mas of Jan 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.6MSeed · Jan 2026 | $1.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 165 | trailAI governance compliance management platform | $6.3M–$10Mas of Jul 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$1.6MSeed · Jul 2024 | $1.6Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 166 | Warden AIAI governance testing and compliance platform | $6M–$10Mas of Jul 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.5MSeed · Jul 2025 | $1.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 167 | YRIKKAVision AI testing and adaptation for defense | $6M–$10Mas of Apr 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.5MSeed · Apr 2025 | $1.5Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 168 | Repello AIAutomated AI red-teaming and guardrails | $5M–$10M | Strong | Implied valuation from raise | $1.2MSeed · Jun 2025 | $1.2Mvalued at 6.2× this |
| 169 | Suzan AIEnterprise AI regulatory compliance platform | $3M–$12M | Partial | Proxy-based estimate | Undisclosed | |
| 170 | Swept AIGoverned private AI workspace for insurers | $5.6M–$9.3Mas of Aug 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.4MSeed · Aug 2025 | $1.4Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 171 | SAIF AutonomySafety assurance software for autonomous systems | $4.8M–$8Mas of Feb 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.2MSeed · Feb 2025 | $1.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 172 | KyvvuSecurity kernel for autonomous AI agents | $4.6M–$7.7Mas of Aug 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | ~$1.2MSeed · Aug 2026 | $1.2Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 173 | HardshellData leakage protection for AI knowledge bases | $4.4M–$7.3Mas of Feb 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.1MSeed · Feb 2026 | $1.1Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 174 | Inspeq AIAI governance and model risk platform | $4.4M–$7.3Mas of May 2024 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.1MSeed · May 2024 | $1.1Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 175 | LangWatchAI agent observability and evaluation platform | $4.4M–$7.3Mas of Feb 2025 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1.1MPre-Seed · Feb 2025 | $1.1Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| 176 | Molt AIAdversarial testing for AI models | $4M–$6.7Mas of Aug 2026 | Low | Estimated from last round | $1MSeed · Aug 2026 | $1Mvalued at 5.3× this |
| Listed in the last 5 years or acquired in the last 3 years · not ranked | ||||||
| Arize AIAI observability and evaluation platform | $915Mas of Aug 2026 | Full | Acquisition value | $70MSeries C · Feb 2025 | $131Mvalued at 7.0× this | |
| LakeraSecurity platform for generative AI applications | $202Mas of Oct 2025 | Full | Acquisition value | $20MSeries A · Jul 2024 | $30Mvalued at 6.7× this | |
| Apex SecuritySecurity and governance for enterprise AI | $48Mas of Jun 2025 | Full | Acquisition value | $7MSeed · May 2024 | $7Mvalued at 6.8× this | |
No startups match this search.
- Total funding is a minimum: some rounds have no public amount.
- Total funding: cranium's reported July 2026 round is not independently confirmed.
- Total funding excludes a reported 2025 investment not yet confirmed as equity.

Our research about AI trust and risk tools gets updated several times a month, so you always get the latest view of where things stand.
Is Arena clearly the most valuable AI TRiSM startup today?
Yes. Arena is clearly the most valuable AI TRiSM startup today, with a reported $3.1B valuation and a 2.6x gap over the midpoint of the company ranked second.
Arena raised a $200M Series B in October 2026 at that valuation, after a $150M Series A in January 2026 and a $100M seed round in May 2025. The company evaluates frontier models and AI agents for real-world alignment, and AI labs and big companies want that kind of proof before they trust a system with important work. Arena also released a preview of its Alignment Index with the round, so the product now tracks models over time instead of testing them once.
The next group is much tighter. Zenity is valued at $833M–$1.6B, HiddenLayer at $667M–$1.2B and Braintrust at $800M. Arena is the only startup whose full valuation is safely above $1B, so for now there is a clear leader rather than a pack of co-leaders.
Are there many AI TRiSM unicorns yet?
No. The AI TRiSM market has only 1 startup whose entire valuation range is certainly $1B or more.
Zenity reaches $1.6B at the top of its range and HiddenLayer reaches $1.2B, but neither has a full range above $1B. Arena is the only company that clears the threshold without qualification. Counting the middle of each range, 2 companies fall in the $1B to $5B bracket, while 174 are below $1B.
That still looks like an early private market rather than a mature software category packed with unicorns. Many of the highest-ranked companies were founded in 2023, 2024 or 2025 and are still at Series A or Series B. Investors are already willing to pay for the possibility that AI security and evaluation become mandatory infrastructure, but most companies have not had enough time to prove that thesis at scale.

In our market report about AI trust and risk tools, we look at what the winners do differently, so you can learn from the best instead of guessing.
Is Zenity the closest challenger to Arena?
Yes. Zenity is the closest challenger to Arena in AI TRiSM valuation, with an implied valuation of $833M–$1.6B.
Zenity raised a $125M Series C in August 2026 led by Norwest, with participation from SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Hitachi Ventures and LG Technology Ventures. The company is built specifically around AI agent security, including systems that can decide and act across enterprise workflows. That gives Zenity a clear place in one of the hottest parts of the market right now: controlling what autonomous agents are allowed to access and do.
Arena is still in another tier. Arena's valuation is 2.6x the midpoint of Zenity's range. Zenity therefore looks like the strongest challenger rather than a co-leader, and its price shows how much investors are willing to pay for agent identity, permissions, monitoring and policy enforcement before the category has fully settled.
How valuable is HiddenLayer now?
HiddenLayer is one of the most valuable AI TRiSM startups today, third in the market with an implied valuation of $667M–$1.2B.
Its September 2026 $100M Series B was led by Delta-v Capital, with participation from Ten Eleven Ventures, Morgan Stanley, M12 and Booz Allen Ventures. HiddenLayer said the capital would deepen its enterprise platform, including runtime protection for agents and security for AI coding agents. The product already stretches across generative, predictive and agentic AI rather than one narrow control.
Braintrust is at $800M, Alice at $700M–$800M and Onyx Security at $640M, so HiddenLayer sits in a crowded second tier. Its full range does not yet make it a certain unicorn. The bet behind the price is straightforward: AI-specific attack surfaces become large enough to support dedicated security vendors instead of being absorbed entirely by existing cybersecurity suites.

In our document detailing everything you need to know about AI TRiSM, you will always find fresh funding data, taken straight from our own verified funding database.
Is Braintrust becoming more than an AI evaluation tool?
Yes. Braintrust's $800M announced valuation shows that AI evaluation and production monitoring are already being priced as core infrastructure.
Braintrust raised an $80M Series B in February 2026 led by ICONIQ, and the round valued the company at $800M. Braintrust describes itself as an observability layer for production AI, with evaluation built into how applications are developed, tested and monitored. That is a much bigger role than selling benchmark reports or occasional model audits.
Braintrust has raised $124M, compared with Alice at $240M and HiddenLayer at $156M. So investors are paying for the place Braintrust could hold in AI software, not for the money it has spent so far. If teams use one system to compare model versions, catch regressions and understand agent behavior, that system can become deeply embedded in production workflows.
Is Alice already a billion-dollar AI security company?
Not yet. Alice is reportedly valued at $700M–$800M, putting it among the largest AI TRiSM startups but still below the unicorn line.
Bloomberg reported in August 2026 that Alice raised $140M in a round led by Apax Digital. Israeli press reports put the valuation at $700M–$800M, fifth among AI TRiSM startups. The company focuses on protecting AI models from misuse and rogue behavior and has worked with major AI providers.
Alice has raised $240M, the second-highest total in our fundraising ranking, yet its $700M–$800M range sits right next to Braintrust's announced $800M, and Braintrust has raised $124M. That is a useful reminder that heavy funding does not automatically produce a higher valuation. Alice still has to turn a large capital base into enough commercial scale and differentiation to move clearly into the next tier.

Learning from others' mistakes is the cheapest lesson there is. In our report covering the AI TRiSM market, we look at what broke startups before you, so you don't repeat it.
Why is AI agent security startup Onyx Security valued so highly so quickly?
Onyx Security is reportedly valued at $640M because investors are paying for a fast-growing control layer around enterprise AI agents.
The company raised $113M in a July 2026 Series B led by Bessemer Venture Partners, bringing total funding to $153M. Onyx said revenue had grown fourfold in the four months since it emerged from stealth and pointed to Fortune 500 customers across banking, technology, insurance and energy. It also expanded integrations with Anthropic for runtime security around Claude.
That is a lot of progress for a company founded in 2024. Onyx is trying to become the place where enterprises discover agents, set policy, inspect behavior and intervene at runtime. Buyers appear willing to pay for that layer now rather than wait for large incumbent security vendors to add every control themselves.
Are AI agent security startups dominating the top valuations?
Largely yes. AI agent security startups occupy much of the top of the AI TRiSM valuation ranking today.
Zenity is valued at $833M–$1.6B, HiddenLayer at $667M–$1.2B, Onyx Security at $640M, Neo Security at $400M–$800M and WitnessAI at $387M–$725M. Straiker is also valued at $320M–$533M. These companies use different architectures, but they all protect autonomous AI systems rather than merely track application performance.
The recent rounds line up with those prices. Zenity raised $125M for enterprise agent security, HiddenLayer's $100M Series B emphasized agentic runtime protection, and Straiker's $64M Series A focused on discovery, adversarial testing and runtime defense. Autonomous agents create machine identities, permissions, tool access and action chains, so security teams suddenly have a new class of software actor to control.
WitnessAI belongs in that same top group. WitnessAI raised a $58M Series B in January 2026, with a focus on enterprise AI data flows and agent activity. Watching what AI does with company data, live, is clearly something buyers will pay for.
The table below shows the highest-valued AI TRiSM startups and their current valuation ranges.
| Company | Valuation | Total raised |
|---|---|---|
| Arena | $3.1B | $450M |
| Zenity | $833M–$1.6B | $184M |
| HiddenLayer | $667M–$1.2B | $156M |
| Braintrust | $800M | $124M |
| Alice | $700M–$800M | $240M |
| Onyx Security | $640M | $153M |
| Neo Security | $400M–$800M | $100M+ |
| WitnessAI | $387M–$725M | $86M |
| Patronus AI | $333M–$625M | $70M |
| Harmonic Security | $333M–$625M | $74M |
Ranges are estimates or round-implied values as described in the methodology.

Your time is limited. In our research about AI trust and risk tools, we put numbers on each part of the market, so you can see where it makes sense to focus.
Is Patronus AI worth more because evaluation is moving into simulation?
Partly. Patronus AI is valued at $333M–$625M, and its push into large-scale simulation gives evaluation a much bigger job than static testing.
That valuation is our estimate from the size of its June 2026 Series B and is dated to that round; it was not announced by the company or investors. Patronus raised $50M in that Series B led by Greenfield Partners and introduced Digital World Models for simulating complex environments where AI agents can practice long-horizon tasks.
If agents need realistic environments before they are allowed into production, evaluation moves closer to core infrastructure. Patronus would then help decide whether an agent is ready to go live, before security tools even come into play. Its range remains below Braintrust's announced $800M, but investors are clearly funding more than one route to proving that advanced AI systems work well enough for real enterprise use.
Is Harmonic Security mainly a data-loss company or an AI security platform?
Harmonic Security now looks much more like an AI security platform for employee and agent use than a narrow data-loss product.
The company is valued at $333M–$625M and raised a $50M Series B in October 2026. Harmonic says its platform protects AI use for millions of employees at more than 100 companies and uses small language models to understand each AI interaction in context. Enterprises need to know which tools people use, what data moves through them and where agentic workflows create new risk.
Harmonic sits tenth in our valuation ranking, tied on displayed range with Patronus AI. Its challenge is obvious: incumbent data-security and browser-security vendors can add AI-specific controls. Harmonic therefore needs to stay useful across many AI applications rather than depend on one model provider or one narrow policy check.

In our market report about AI trust and risk tools, we always try to gather several sources and make estimates that make sense, so you can work with solid numbers.
Do higher AI TRiSM valuations always mean more capital raised?
No. AI TRiSM valuations and total funding often move very differently.
Braintrust is valued at $800M after raising $124M, while Alice has raised $240M but is reportedly valued at $700M–$800M. Onyx Security is reportedly valued at $640M on $153M raised. At the extremes of this comparison, Arena has the highest valuation-to-funding multiple at 6.9x, while Attestable has the lowest at 2.8x.
Different products need different amounts of capital. Evaluation software can scale differently from security businesses that build threat research, enterprise integrations and large sales teams. A heavily funded company can also stay at a lower valuation until investors see stronger commercial proof. Funding shows how much capital has gone in; valuation shows what investors think the company could become.
The table below shows examples of stated valuations compared with total equity raised.
| Company | Valuation | Total raised | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena | $3.1B | $450M | 6.9x |
| Zenity | $833M–$1.6B | $184M | 6.5x |
| HiddenLayer | $667M–$1.2B | $156M | 6.1x |
| Braintrust | $800M | $124M | 6.4x |
| Alice | $700M–$800M | $240M | 3.1x |
| Onyx Security | $640M | $153M | 4.2x |
| Irregular | $450M | $80M | 5.6x |
| Attestable | $80M–$133M | $38M | 2.8x |
Is the United States completely dominating AI TRiSM valuations?
The United States dominates AI TRiSM by company count, but Israel has a much stronger presence near the top than its size suggests.
Arena, HiddenLayer, Braintrust, Neo Security and WitnessAI are all American. Yet Zenity, Alice and Onyx Security, all from Israel, are in the top six, with Noma Security and AIR Security further down.
That fits Israel's long cybersecurity track record. Agent security, identity, runtime defense and data protection all look familiar to founders who have already built around earlier security shifts. The United States still has the biggest overall base because it combines frontier-model companies, enterprise software buyers and deep venture markets, but the top of AI TRiSM is clearly not American-only.

If you build or invest in the AI TRiSM market, you need to know which business models pay off now and which ones are fading. That's why our report covering it has a whole section on it.
Is Europe producing serious AI TRiSM companies or mostly small governance vendors?
Europe is producing serious AI TRiSM companies, but its largest private valuations still sit below the US and Israeli leaders.
The United Kingdom leads Europe with Mindgard at $150M–$250M and Geordie AI at an announced $180M valuation. Geordie raised a $30M Series A in May 2026 and said ARR had grown 1300% in the first five months of the year. Mindgard raised a $30M Series A in August 2026 and said its technology had uncovered more than 150 publicly disclosed high-impact vulnerabilities across popular AI applications.
These are security and governance products aimed at enterprise agent deployment, red teaming and runtime control. Switzerland also has LatticeFlow AI and Modulos, while France has Naaia and Giskard. Europe has real technical depth; what it has not produced yet is an Arena-scale private valuation in this market.
Are acquisitions already validating AI TRiSM as a real software category?
Yes. Strategic buyers are already paying for AI TRiSM companies, which is strong evidence that these products are becoming part of the enterprise software stack.
Three AI TRiSM startups have already been bought at known prices: Arize AI at a $915M acquisition value, Lakera at $202M and Apex Security at $48M. Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks in July 2025 and integrated into Prisma AIRS. Palo Alto Networks said the acquisition would extend protection across models, applications and agents, including model scanning, posture management, red teaming and runtime security.
Fiddler AI gives another current example. CrowdStrike announced plans to acquire the company in November 2026, after Fiddler said in January 2026 that revenue had grown more than 4x over the prior 18 months; until the deal closes, our ranking still shows Fiddler as an independent startup valued at $200M–$375M. Large security platforms clearly want AI observability, evaluation and governance inside their own products rather than leaving every layer to independent startups.

In our report covering the AI TRiSM market, we don't want to repeat what boring consulting reports say. Instead, we show you the real and latest market signals that matter.
Could AI certification startup AIUC become a much bigger company?
Possibly, but AIUC first needs outside AI trust checks to become a normal step before companies deploy AI, not a niche certification business.
AIUC is valued at $200M–$333M and raised a $40M Series A in September 2026, bringing total funding to $55M. The company positions itself around frontier AI standards and insurance and says companies including Cursor, ElevenLabs, Harvey, KPMG, Lovable, UiPath and Fin certify against its AIUC-1 trustmark. Its model is closer to an Underwriters Laboratories-style assurance layer than a conventional cybersecurity product.
That could become important if enterprises start requiring repeatable outside proof before deploying powerful AI systems. The obvious risk is fragmentation: standards can split across regulators, insurers and industry groups. For now, AIUC's valuation shows real interest in independent assurance, but it still sits well below the companies controlling runtime security and agent behavior.
So, which AI trust, risk and security startups are worth the most today?
Arena is the clear number one AI TRiSM startup by valuation today at $3.1B, followed by a second tier led by Zenity, HiddenLayer and Braintrust.
Zenity is valued at $833M–$1.6B, HiddenLayer at $667M–$1.2B, Braintrust at $800M, Alice at $700M–$800M and Onyx Security at $640M. The companies do different jobs, but most sit directly between powerful AI systems and real enterprise deployment.
That is where private-market value is clustering now. Evaluation, agent security, runtime control, data protection and enforceable governance all solve problems that appear once AI systems can actually act inside a company. AI TRiSM is already a meaningful software market, but one company is clearly a unicorn and the rest are still fighting over which control layers become durable platforms.
The table below shows the strongest conclusions from the article.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Is there a clear valuation leader? | Yes, Arena sits well ahead of every other startup. Arena's reported valuation reaches $3.1B after its October 2026 Series B. No other startup has a full range close to it. |
| Is the AI TRiSM market full of unicorns? | Not at all, the unicorn club is still tiny. Only 1 startup has its whole valuation range above $1B. Many leaders are still young Series A or Series B companies. |
| Who is Arena's closest challenger? | Zenity, the Israeli agent security startup, comes closest. Zenity's August 2026 Series C implies a value of $833M–$1.6B. Arena is still worth 2.6x the midpoint of that range. |
| Are agents driving AI security valuations? | Yes, agent security fills much of the top ten. Zenity, HiddenLayer, Onyx Security and WitnessAI all protect AI agents. Companies now need controls over what AI agents actually do. |
| Can evaluation alone build a large company? | Yes, evaluation is turning into everyday production software. Braintrust carries an $800M valuation announced with its February 2026 Series B. Teams use it to test and monitor AI before and after launch. |
| Does more funding mean a higher valuation? | No, money raised and price often move apart. Alice raised $240M yet is reportedly valued at $700M–$800M. Braintrust reached an announced $800M with only $124M raised. |
| Is Israel important at the top? | Yes, Israel punches far above its weight here. Zenity, Alice and Onyx Security all sit in the top six. A long cybersecurity track record shows in agent security. |
| Why is Onyx Security priced so high already? | Investors are betting on very fast early growth. Onyx Security said revenue quadrupled in the four months after stealth. The July 2026 Series B came with a reported $640M valuation. |
| Are big security companies buying these startups? | Yes, strategic buyers are already paying for AI security. Palo Alto Networks completed its Protect AI acquisition in July 2025. CrowdStrike announced plans to acquire Fiddler AI in November 2026. |
| Can Europe compete in AI security startups? | Yes, but at smaller valuations than the leaders. Mindgard and Geordie AI show serious technical and commercial traction. Geordie AI said its ARR grew 1300% in early 2026. |
| What decides the winners now? | Being used in real production work matters most. Buyers pay for controls around AI systems that actually act. Demos and one-off audits count for much less than daily use. |

When you build or invest in the AI TRiSM market, you need clarity, not confusion. In our market report about AI trust and risk tools, we always try to put numbers on and quantify whatever is usually vague and confusing.
Our methodology
Our data runs through November 12, 2026. We define AI TRiSM as dedicated commercial technology for discovering, assessing, governing, monitoring and enforcing trust, risk, security and accountability controls over third-party or internally deployed AI models, applications and autonomous agents. Companies on the border of the definition are included rather than left out when AI-specific risk, security or assurance controls are a material part of the customer product. Every company in the main ranking is an independent startup under our definition; acquired or listed companies are shown apart.
Every startup in this ranking has raised equity funding, and each valuation comes with a confidence level that shows how it was obtained. A Full rating means the company announced the valuation itself, or several independent sources report the same figure. A Strong rating means a credible press report gives the valuation, or it follows directly from the terms of a funding round, such as the amount raised and the stake sold.
When no valuation has been disclosed, it is estimated. A Partial rating means the startup was compared with similar companies at the same stage, using indicators such as revenue, deal terms or recent transactions in the sector. A Low rating means the only reliable data point is the last equity round: the valuation is then derived from the amount raised and the share of the company that startups usually give up at that stage, which is why it is shown as a range and dated to that round.
Several safeguards keep these figures honest. Valuations that appear only in commercial databases, with no article or company statement behind them, are not used, and neither are share sales between existing shareholders, which often take place at a discount or a premium. Rounds older than five years are not used to estimate a valuation, debt and grants never count as equity, and companies whose claims are disputed are left out of the ranking. Startups that have since been acquired or have gone public are listed separately, valued at their acquisition price or market capitalization rather than at a past private round.
Companies are ordered by the midpoint of their range, and each one is judged on its whole funding history, not on a single period. Total funding counts equity only, with debt, grants and post-IPO offerings excluded, and a "+" total is a minimum. A round counts in a total only when a company announcement, filing or press article confirms it, or, without an article, when two recognised databases agree on its date and amount; that lower-confidence route is never used for a company above $100M raised. Valuations come from company announcements, filings and reliable press, never from a database figure alone.
A range estimated from the last round can rank above a smaller stated valuation because the ranking orders every company by the midpoint of its range. A Low estimate reflects what startups usually give up at that stage for a round of that size and is dated to that round, while the confidence level lets the reader weigh it differently from a valuation stated by a company, investor or credible report.
Key sources include Arena's $200M Series B and $3.1B valuation., Zenity's $125M Series C and agent-security positioning., HiddenLayer's $100M Series B and runtime-security expansion., Braintrust's $80M Series B and production-AI positioning., Braintrust's reported $800M post-money valuation., Alice's $140M financing led by Apax Digital., Israeli press report on Alice's valuation., Onyx Security's $113M Series B and revenue growth., WitnessAI's $58M financing and enterprise AI-security focus., Straiker's $64M Series A and agent-security platform., Patronus AI's $50M Series B and Digital World Models., Harmonic Security's $50M Series B and workforce AI controls., Harmonic's reach across employees and companies., Geordie AI's Series A and ARR growth claim., Mindgard's Series A and vulnerability research., AIUC's $40M Series A and assurance model., Fiddler's Series C, growth and control-plane positioning., CrowdStrike acquisition announcement for Fiddler., Palo Alto Networks' acquisition of Protect AI and Prisma AIRS integration., and Arize AI's Series C and evaluation platform strategy..

A good product starts with a real problem. In our document detailing everything you need to know about AI TRiSM, we show you the ones customers still live with.
Written by the New Market Pitch teamWe track new markets so founders and investors can move faster. About us
